Google Now

Malcolm Clement

New member
Nov 12, 2012
79
0
0
Visit site
So it's useless because it's not supported in your region?

Just like Nokia Maps is pretty useless where I am. The US. The lack of accurate POIs makes it useless here.

Google Now is great in the US but not in the UK is what BUSNGABB was saying. And I'm saying that Nokia Maps may be great in other parts of the world but in North America, where I am, it is useless solely based on the fact that the POI database is terribly inaccurate.
 

a5cent

New member
Nov 3, 2011
6,622
0
0
Visit site
English fail.
1. A small part broken off or detached.
2. An incomplete or isolated portion; a bit: overheard fragments of their conversation; extant fragments of an old manuscript.
3. Grammar A sentence fragment.

Exactly. Also a technical fail.

MS' services were never broken off or detached from one another, as they never belonged to a single coherent whole. Being a fragment of something implies having belonged to an unfragmented whole at some point, which MS' individual services never did.
 

a5cent

New member
Nov 3, 2011
6,622
0
0
Visit site
I have a few phones with Google Now and its mostly useless.

Even if you find the current implementation of Google Now useless (which may people in the world currently will), you must at least admit that they have the right idea, no? At least it does have the potential to be devastating to the competition if WP, iOS, etc. can't offer decent alternatives.
 

Bee Mon

New member
Apr 11, 2012
764
0
0
Visit site
"Putting aside the understandably troubling aspects of Google’s knowledge about you for a moment, Google Now is a revelation."??? Personally I find this creepy. I certainly do not want a HAL9000 monitoring and recording my every movement. If this is the way all smartphones are going, I'm going to dumb down back to a feature phone. I'd feel much safer. I doubt Microsoft would be allowed to do the same thing without getting sued for invasion of privacy.
 

tekhna

New member
Mar 21, 2012
499
0
0
Visit site
Exactly. Also a technical fail.

MS' services were never broken off or detached from one another, as they never belonged to a single coherent whole. Being a fragment of something implies having belonged to an unfragmented whole at some point, which MS' individual services never did.

No, because both of us were thinking of isolated, as your original post reflected. But semantics aside, Google has an ecosystem that allows for Now to work. Microsoft doesn't.
 

arrowrand

New member
Dec 13, 2012
142
0
0
Visit site
What MS couldn't / wouldn't do is surface that ticket offer based on an e-mail you wrote.
You meant to say what Microsoft would do, if they could, would be the exact same thing.

Until this Scroogle thing runs it's course, MS can't do anything nearly as useful as Now.

Call it useless or creepy or anything else that you like. If you use it, it's a very helpful feature.
 

1101x10

New member
May 27, 2012
181
0
0
Visit site
It seems like a good money making opportunity for Google. Retailers pay so when you go in their shop it gives you the special offers etc. I'm not sure I like the privacy aspect of this service though.
I seem to remember before WP8 came out Microsoft had a video of a Windows Phone doing something similar to this so maybe they are working on it.
 

a5cent

New member
Nov 3, 2011
6,622
0
0
Visit site
No, because both of us were thinking of isolated, as your original post reflected. But semantics aside, Google has an ecosystem that allows for Now to work. Microsoft doesn't.

If you were also thinking "isolated", why not just say so? Why the attitude, and why quote the definition of a completely different and, more importantly, negatively charged word?

No, forget I asked...

Anyway, it is obvious that precisely the use-case you were so impressed by, isn't at all beyond Microsoft's reach. Without a concrete example of something Google can achieve only by accessing their aggregated, server side user profiles, I would suspect you are mistaken.

The only difference I see is where aggregated user profiles are generated and stored, either on users devices (MS), or on company servers (Google).
 

a5cent

New member
Nov 3, 2011
6,622
0
0
Visit site
You meant to say what Microsoft would do, if they could, would be the exact same thing.

Until this Scroogle thing runs it's course, MS can't do anything nearly as useful as Now.
No. I meant to say exactly what I did say.

I understand your views of MS and Google but I don't share them. I don't think we need to take that issue any further either.

In regard to the topic at hand, if you believe MS can't do anything as useful, you will need to back that up with an example of what Google Now might achieve that Microsoft can't. You may even be right, but I don't see it. Otherwise I'm going to view this as hot Google-Fan air. ;-)

Call it useless or creepy or anything else that you like. If you use it, it's a very helpful feature.

Are you still addressing that towards me? I didn't call "it" any of those things. In fact, I like it and don't think it's creepy.
 

DaveDash

New member
Jan 27, 2013
18
0
0
Visit site
Google now (outside the US) is not a "must have" feature.

When I first got my Google Nexus I thought "wow, cool", but after a while I never really used it at all. Integrating with your calendar and warning you about traffic is neat, but it's so unreliably anyway that it's just a gimmic. Also, sifting through your gmail and other applications and being "proactive" about things you'd searched for just got annoying, and somewhat scary (in terms of privacy) at the same time.

The *only* thing that Google really has over Microsoft is Google maps. Google maps is THE most accurate mapping system world wide, and mapping systems ARE the most widely used app on mobile devices. Microsoft should focus on improving it's mapping service along with it's OEM partners mapping services, well before worrying about Google Now.
 

arrowrand

New member
Dec 13, 2012
142
0
0
Visit site
In regard to the topic at hand, if you believe MS can't do anything as useful, you will need to back that up with an example of what Google Now might achieve that Microsoft can't. You may even be right, but I don't see it. Otherwise I'm going to view this as hot Google-Fan air. ;-)
Here are my examples, from just this week, why MS CAN'T do anything nearly as useful as Google Now thanks to their Scroogle campaign.

1. Tracking updates for 3 high value UPS shipments. Tracking info picked up from Gmail.
2. Wife's flight was delayed. Thanks to her itinerary being emailed to me, Google Now let me know she would be 45 minutes later than scheduled.
3. Had a meeting this week an hour from house. Google Now alerted me to traffic conditions caused by weather, letting me know I needed another 30 minutes to get there. Info came from Google Calendar and Gmail. Ended up I only needed an extra 10 minutes, but I'd prefer to be early rather than late.

That's all stuff that MS can't do thanks to Mark Penn and his Scroogle campaign against Google. Once that runs its course and everyone has mostly forgotten all about it, MS can (and let's be honest, probably will) bring some smart personal assistant features to WP. Until then, well, we get what we have.
Am I aware of the privacy concerns of using Google services? Yes, yes I am. Am I OK with it? Yes, yes I am.

Are you still addressing that towards me? I didn't call "it" any of those things. In fact, I like it and don't think it's creepy.
Uh, no, I'm not. That's a broad-based response to all of those comments made in the thread. I'm often guilty of this mistake of seemingly directing a comment at one person in particular when it is a response to a larger group. My fault.
 

arrowrand

New member
Dec 13, 2012
142
0
0
Visit site
Google now (outside the US) is not a "must have" feature.
I'm an American and I live in the US. My experiences with Google Now are based solely on my own use of it, in the United States.

Integrating with your calendar and warning you about traffic is neat, but it's so unreliably anyway that it's just a gimmic. Also, sifting through your gmail and other applications and being "proactive" about things you'd searched for just got annoying, and somewhat scary (in terms of privacy) at the same time.
You can turn off cards that surface search results, and it's not an all or nothing experience. You can have events and locations that you've searched for active while disabling what I think they call research topics.

Here's the thing: if MS rolled this feature out today, most people (including me) would welcome it. Privacy implications might be mentioned in passing, but folks would be accepting of the fact that MS would offer something like Google Now, even though it meant pulling data from calendars, Outlook mail and search history. I trust Google, and I trust Microsoft. It isn't that I trust Google more than Microsoft, it's that Google offers me insanely useful features. If MS began using the info that they collect about me in the same way, I'd welcome that, Happily.
 

Torch4x4

New member
Dec 8, 2012
83
0
0
Visit site
What I understand is: for better results on Google Now you should use gmail, google search, google calendar, and all google ecosystem... ok I like the Scout app or other apps on WP8 even if they collect my likes from facebook or locations or whatever, is not so bad, the problem is that if I move to android I still prefer some MS products over google products...
However a simple search for instance a camera or a watch using google now will result in ads for me almost forever, even after I buy those products or if I change my mind and decide not to buy I will continue receiving those ads like the current google search on the web browser? google is an advertisement company and is not providing those wonderful things for free...
 

slashd0t

New member
Nov 11, 2012
170
0
0
Visit site
Google Now is freaking amazing.. I'm in Cupertino right now (irony) and I was on google maps on my laptop getting directions back to SFO airport tomorrow... I picked up my Nexus 4 a few hours later, was on Google Now, and it had the directions to SFO integrated already for me.. I didn't prompt this, but, it knew that I was going to be doing the drive based on me looking it up earlier..

Google Now is seriously the most important mobile innovation in the last year IMO ..
 

a5cent

New member
Nov 3, 2011
6,622
0
0
Visit site
Here are my examples, from just this week:
<snipped>
1. Tracking updates for 3 high value UPS shipments. Tracking info picked up from Gmail.
2. Wife's flight was delayed. Thanks to her itinerary being emailed to me, Google Now let me know she would be 45 minutes later than scheduled.
3. Had a meeting this week an hour from house. Google Now alerted me to traffic conditions caused by weather, letting me know I needed another 30 minutes to get there. Info came from Google Calendar and Gmail. Ended up I only needed an extra 10 minutes, but I'd prefer to be early rather than late.

Awesome examples! However, I see no reason why MS couldn't do all of that and more.

It appears you expect such features must be implemented server-side, when in truth the only reason Google does this server-side is because that is what is necessary for them to earn money. If you aren't collecting and selling that data, then it is much cheaper to implement such features client-side, i.e. on users own personal devices.

As long as the data collected by those profiling routines stays on my devices, Microsoft can scan my mails as much as they want without raising any red privacy flags. Explain to my why this can't work and I'll believe you have a point.

That's all stuff that MS can't do thanks to Mark Penn and his Scroogle campaign against Google.

We also couldn't disagree more on the importance of this Scroogle campaign. You seem to think it has the power to dictate Microsoft's policies and strategies, whereas I think it is completely irrelevant. Either way, I don't think Microsoft is forced to degrade any privacy policies to compete with Google Now. Only the methods by which they collect that information will differ, which is fine, as long as Microsoft doesn't also intend to become a competitor in the advertising business.
 

palandri

Retired Moderator
Jul 25, 2009
7,586
3
0
Visit site
I bought a Nexus 4 to play with. You guys are making Google Now sound like it has a brain of it's own. :grin: It doesn't, it's dependant on data from a 3rd party.

It doesn't know about traffic jams unless that information is available through your DOT. It doesn't know about trains or planes being late unless that information is available from a 3rd party. My wife and I fly from time to time, we always signup for SMS alerts. It does the same thing.
 

WinFan1

New member
Oct 18, 2011
280
0
0
Visit site
"Putting aside the understandably troubling aspects of Google?s knowledge about you for a moment, Google Now is a revelation."??? Personally I find this creepy. I certainly do not want a HAL9000 monitoring and recording my every movement. If this is the way all smartphones are going, I'm going to dumb down back to a feature phone. I'd feel much safer. I doubt Microsoft would be allowed to do the same thing without getting sued for invasion of privacy.
Thank YOU! i can not fathom how people are so fine with a advertisement giant spying and learning what they do every single day. i do enjoy my privacy, that is absolutely not something i would ever use. even more reason to stay away from google. i would much rather have siri than this spyware on my phone. This is the problem people have today they want their phone to do everything for them EVERYTHING, people thats why we have arms, legs, eyes, and ears what the heck do people expect their phones to hold their junk when they use the restroom? this dependance on tech for everything is disturbing. i use my phone for productivity and recieving information when i need it. 'Nuff Said.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
323,183
Messages
2,243,404
Members
428,036
Latest member
Tallgeeselll05