- 01-22-2013, 07:35 PM #26
01-22-2013, 09:56 PM #27
- 1,342 Posts
- 01-23-2013, 09:25 AM #31
- 01-23-2013, 09:40 AM #32
Microsoft is now trying a new strategy, WP8 and Windows 8 share the same kernel and many programming interfaces. Microsoft's promise to developers is convergence to a unified platform.
Windows 8 is so big that even with a slow adoption can sell hundreds of millions of licenses, this volume will attract developers. The apps for Windows 8 can be ported to WP at a fraction of the cost, in this stage is more reasonable for Microsoft to invest big money in paying the port to WP. So WP's success is tied to Windows 8 success.
The good news is that both Windows 8 and WP8 are gaining traction, with more devices out there, more apps will come faster.
Other important factor is HTML5, the impact of this technology in the app landscape will be significant. If Microsoft pay money to port applications from iOS to WP, that investment could be lost because for many apps HTML5 will replace native apps and HTML5 apps run on any device. For example, banks, retail, apps that show information, even some games, should go HTML5.
The mobile industry is not consolidated, this is a transition stage, Microsoft can't spend much money if things will change soon.
- 01-23-2013, 09:41 AM #33
Advertise the heck out of Windows Phone. Microsoft's advertising spending is nowhere near where it can be. This is a company that spent $6.2 billion on aQuantive for no reason other than panic and $8 billion on Skype, an acquisition that hasn't seen any material ecosystem benefit. Mobile is where Microsoft needs to be right now. It's more important than an advertising platform and it's more important than snagging a (pretty crappy, if I may say so) communication service. How much is Microsoft spending on marketing Windows Phone? A couple hundred million a year? Well, news flash - Samsung spends $4 billion on advertising, and you bet a huge portion of that is promoting their Galaxy brand. Microsoft needs to step up and match that if it wishes Windows Phone to get the penetration that the Galaxy brand has gotten - which is second only to the iPhone.
- 01-23-2013, 10:24 AM #34
You actually thought they were focusing on Windows Phone 8? Like doing stuff to make it better? LOL! Now why would they do that??
- 01-23-2013, 10:26 AM #35
- 01-23-2013, 10:27 AM #36
- 01-23-2013, 10:30 AM #37
- 01-23-2013, 11:49 AM #38
A big push for exclusive games on WP9 will be the other (which I was hoping to see for WP8).
- 01-25-2013, 12:58 PM #44
I'm not sure why most people can't grasp that Microsoft is looking at Windows 8 adoption to help boost Windows Phone 8 adoption.
It should be noted that Microsoft's live tiles interface makes some apps a little more difficult to develop, if those apps will have live information. If the user share isn't there, other developers won't develop "live" apps. If the user share IS there, they will (or at least some of them will).
- 01-25-2013, 03:50 PM #45
- 01-25-2013, 08:54 PM #46
- 01-25-2013, 11:47 PM #47
The Galaxy S3 has just hit 40 million after 7 months only because Samsung's distribution power made in available in every single country in the world, and Samsung supported it with advertising in every single one of those markets. A small company like RIM would likely be unable to even produce 40 million BB10 handsets within a year; unlike Samsung, they don't actually operate factories making RAM chips, screens, batteries and SoCs.
- 01-26-2013, 12:22 AM #48
The Microsoft haters who have recently been trumping the "Microsoft owns so little of the computing device pie!" mantra are plain ridiculous. It's no myth that Microsoft doesn't own a majority of computing devices - when did it? Billions of dumb phones that have sold through the years. (Though I guess those don't count, because they are "dumb" - yet the cheap Android crap that is replacing them are years behind the true smartphone flagships and are most certainly dumb in comparison.)
Would you do the same with TVs and tablets, just because they are both electronics and great for consuming media content?
Microsoft's mistake was skimping out on features such as VPN. Makes absolutely no sense; why bother working on DataSense, which is enabled on about 0.1% of carriers worldwide, rather than VPN? The manager of the Windows Phone team needs to be fired.
Last edited by AngryNil; 01-26-2013 at 12:42 AM.
01-27-2013, 06:38 AM #50
- 1,107 Posts
App situation is something that will come when WP reaches critical mass. Only thing MS can do is to make dev and publishing part as easy as possible. This is no issue.
To achieve that critical mass...
What i do agree is that WP will need to move much faster. Not impressed at all so far. They are moving like the MS we know, not the MS they should be to even compete against Google and Apple. MS really needs to broaden it's HW support much faster and bring OS updates more often.
Non trackable bar on music player just being one of the many examples that you think it can't take 3 years or how the OS handles MicroSD.
- By the_tyrant in forum Windows Phone 8Replies: 1Last Post: 12-11-2012, 02:30 AM
- By Landsharkk in forum Windows Phone 8Replies: 4Last Post: 11-06-2012, 03:28 AM
- By Siah1214 in forum Upcoming & Rumored DevicesReplies: 15Last Post: 06-18-2012, 03:42 PM
- By Joelist in forum Windows Phone 7Replies: 28Last Post: 11-28-2011, 02:03 PM
- By Bballbenb in forum Upcoming & Rumored DevicesReplies: 50Last Post: 11-14-2011, 06:06 AM