I beg to differ. WinRT is a programming model, not a version of the OS. x86/x64 tablets will run the same RT apps that ARM tablets run. So I am using RT on my i5 tablet but I can launch the desktop and run Windows apps as well. I understand that ARM devices will require a customized SoC build of Win8 and will only run RT apps and that these builds would not have been released yet since the hardware hasn't been released to the general public and would thus be useless. So I would suggest that I am running WinRT on my i5 tablet. Is the OS code base exactly the same? No, for obvious reasons. Is the experience the same? Yes. Your point?
My point is your are confusing RT and Metro. There is no such thing as an RT app. There are Metro apps (which will run in Windows 8 or Windows RT) and Desktop apps (which only run in Windows 8). So my point is no, you are absolutely in no way running Windows RT. You are confusing Windows RT and the Metro Apps and Start Screen (which you do have). The fact is that ARM devices don't have a special build of Windows 8, they have Windows RT, which is then further custom tailored for their particular hardware. Windows RT is a version of the OS, Metro is the program model. The experience is not the same. If the experience were the same they wouldn't bother making the distinction between Win8 and Windows RT. Yes, you can comment on what the METRO experience is like on a tablet, but you have no idea what it will be like to use Windows RT on an ARM based tablet vs. using Windows 8 on an x86/x64 based tablet (which is what you have). Since that is the whole point of this discussion, I felt the need to point it out so if some one less educated in the differences comes in they won't be misled by your statements into thinking that Windows RT and Metro are the same and that any tablet is running Windows RT instead of Windows 8, which is grossly inaccurate.