Well with AT&T getting an exclusive on the 920 looks like my split decision on which to get has been made for me. I'm a Verizon customer so looks like Nokia lost out on my money
I was all set to get the 920 it edged out the 8x on a few features. Granted those might have been gimmicks but still I wanted a top of the class phone and I just felt the 8x was just a little bit behind the 920 but Nokia just showed me they don't care about me so I'm voting with my money and getting the 8x. Unless Verizon gets a 922 then all would be forgiven. But come November 2 I'm getting a new phone
I agree. No expandable storage is fine IF you give a large amount of memory. To me, the 8X is already playing from behind because of the bad Titan 1 experience. The T2 is a good enough device to keep me from totally scratching them off the list, but at this rate the Nokia 820 or it's variants may have more advantages. I will give it a look see, but I can't help but feel that HTC has something bigger planned for the next wave of WP8 releases. This just feels like a half effort to me.If the 8X had 32GB of storage it would of been a really hard decision to choose between the 920 and 8X since I really do like the styling of the 8X better. But the 920 has the Pureview tech and does indeed have 32GB of storage so it's a no brainer. Why can't HTC had more storage to the 8X?