- 05-15-2013, 06:27 PM #1
This is a TDLR post, including multiple sections.. Don't know what forum this goes in.
WHY DID I POST THIS?
So, they host an I/O full of bragging and hypocritical comments about our platform. Then, they send a letter about removing Microsofts YouTube app. Funny thing about that is that thousands ANDROID YouTube apps/downloaders violate the same TOS. They aren't removed. Then Google goes on to drop Gtalk support in outlook, something MS added a few days ago. A few days ago, I was increasingly frustrated with WPs progress in getting apps, and even had a few scary thoughts about moving back to android. That lasted up until these last few announcements. I will never, and never plan to move back to such an EVIL company. I am happy still google free and enjoying it.
GOOGLE BEING SCROOGLED:
Now, if google would use common sense, they could figure out that there is an increasing anti-google movement (spearheaded by Microsoft's scroogled campaign and Google's own monopoly-like actions). They seem to just buy out a company (Like YouTube) and then just hold it down and prevent innovation. This anti-google movement, as I call it, would have probably never happened if they didn't act like a MONOPOLY that ABUSES ITS PRIVILEGES to shut down services that users love and make more money.
WP AND GOOGLE SERVICES:
While google continues to gain traction, MS is also doing this. What google can't realize is that about every 5 new WP users is 3 less google users. Why? BECAUSE WP USERS CANNOT ACCESS GOOGLE SERVICES. When an average user can't use the service they love, they look for alternatives like Outlook, Skype, and Bing. Now, this brings me to the point of this post....
IS GOOGLE MAD?
As WP gains traction and W8 continues to be adopted, this produces a snowball effect when users find out how integrated MS services are into their OS. This makes more people quit using google. Sometimes, they might subconsciously hit the hardware button that says "Search" instead of taking the time to go to google.com.
IS GOOGLE MAD? PART 2: SABOTAGE
Because the rise of Microsoft is a lose-lose for Google, they are beginning to sabotage the platform. This sabotage keeps hardcore google service users away from the platform, leaving the only room for us to grow from is new phone users and iOS users.
(Sorry, the bottom line part was cut off)
Google sees this issue and is now acting to save their a**.
Last edited by IN5TIGATOR; 05-16-2013 at 11:11 AM.
- 05-15-2013, 06:48 PM #2
Not really sure what your point is. No, Google is not mad. It's the dominant company in a marketplace and wants to defend its territory. Is it playing 'hardball' with Microsoft? Yes, probably. Does it care whether it loses a handful of Google apps users to Windows live services and the WP8 ecosystem? Probably not. At least not at this stage. If WP8 uptake continues and accelerates, perhaps Google will revise its thinking. At the moment it's just small change for Google, and it would most likely accept p!ssing off a few of its millions of Google services users to stifle the uptake of WP.
Keep in mind that Microsoft is no startup with limited resources. And it's no stranger to playing hardball itself (anyone remember the 'browser wars' and various anti-trust suits?).
What we're seeing is a couple of bull elephants locking tusks and jockying for position. Unfortunately all we can do is try not to get squashed under their feet as they go about their maneuvers.
- 05-15-2013, 07:07 PM #3
With WP on course to hit roughly 50 million users by year end (at least at the current growth rate - something I predict will actually accelerate) Google stands to tick off a lot of people who likely use their services daily. Maybe it's time they put their big boy pants on and learn how to maximize their user base by producing a better product and making it as widely available as possible. It's kind of how they got here in the first place.
- 05-15-2013, 07:09 PM #4
It appears to me that Microsoft was baiting Google by releasing the app and anticipated this kind of public response so Microsoft could call out Google again on their unwillingness to throw Microsoft a bone. Notice how MS took advantage of Larry Paige talking about interoperability and referenced that in their public reply today. Well played by MS.
- 05-15-2013, 07:27 PM #7
- 05-15-2013, 07:49 PM #10
Even now, Google is messing with around 30 million users. Not smart.
- 05-15-2013, 07:50 PM #11
- 05-15-2013, 07:54 PM #12
- 05-15-2013, 08:32 PM #13
Last report I read, WP was sitting somewhere around 3% market share, with Android upwards of 70%. WP is certainly growing fast at the moment, but it's starting from a low base. So as I said before, Google will probably not be worried about annoying somewhat less that 3% of potential users (I say somewhat less because not all WP users will have or want to use Google services, and a certain percentage that do use some of the Google offerings like YouTube will be happy with what's available on WP at the moment).
- 05-15-2013, 08:33 PM #15
Interesting posts people! Thanks!
The company holding the longer stick will gladly use every opportunity to make the digital lives of their competitions customers a little less care free, as long as they don't have to be too obvious about it. In the complicated world of computing that is surprisingly simple.
Google's actions are just plain old free market competition and good business sense... that doesn't make it any more endearing to the WP minority.
- 05-15-2013, 08:44 PM #16
Market share is only a good measure for certain things. A business isn't in place to have gain market share. They exist to maximize profits on investments...period. Apple is a perfect example. They don't care if they have the top market share...just that they have a strong growing user base that keeps adding to their revenue stream and upping their profits. This is why Google is being stupid here. If WP isn't really a threat, then why not let MS add to your revenues and profit margins?
- 05-15-2013, 09:04 PM #17
Your calculation must consider not just the profits to be had from WP users today, but also those to be had from discouraging WP's growth and minimizing WP's future market share.
I have no idea what that cost calculation looks like, but I'm willing to bet that $120 million is nothing compared to the profit potential of more lock-in and lower WP market share.
- 05-15-2013, 09:23 PM #18
Hence the current head-butting match.
- 05-15-2013, 09:29 PM #19
Yes, but if Google believes that, then they have a flawed strategy. One look at the various surveys indicate that Android has a problem with users not particularly keen on staying with it. Further, iOS and BB would be in the same boat as WP, but they are ignored. Not too mention MS makes more money off Android, it seems, than Google.
The real problem for Google is that MS has just made the ultimate "anti-competitive practices" play. MS can, if Google continues to prevent API access, take this straight to the DOJ and the EU and show them just how anti-competitive Google is being. This is what it is really all about. MS just backed them into a corner. Google's most profitable play is to maximize revenue by allowing MS more access to it's services. The more Google fights MS, the more likely they are to get screwed by regulators, and the more likely MS is to develop services that blow Google's services away and take more revenue potential away from them (see Outlook.com and SkyDrive, both, in my opinion, far superior to the Google alternatives). MS is making it's competitive services available on other platforms as well, meaning Google is in even deeper trouble trying to lock users in.
What happens if MS goes gung ho and purchases someone like Vimeo, and makes the service a top notch one? Now Google is going to start loosing marketshare and ad revenues in that arena. MS has the cash flow to do this, so Google needs to watch what they are doing. So far everything they have done is just childish moves based on hate/dislike, as opposed to making sound business decisions.
- 05-15-2013, 10:09 PM #20
And the whole 'anti-competitive' thing is a bit of a side issues in this debate. While Google are playing hard ball, there's nothing to support any action by the DOJ or similar bodies. So far all Google has done is pull support for ActiveSync in it's services, a protocol that it was paying licensing fees to MS to use, and insisted that, with respect to its YouTube app, MS abide by the terms and conditions set out in the API licensing. Neither of those would support any charge of anti-competitive behaviour as the DOJ would define it.
05-15-2013, 11:57 PM #21
- 343 Posts
05-16-2013, 12:27 AM #23
- 1,449 Posts
- By NickNick43 in forum Phone WarsReplies: 4Last Post: 03-26-2013, 10:00 PM
- By DontHate707 in forum AndroidReplies: 2Last Post: 07-12-2011, 08:47 PM
- By Umm Yeah in forum Windows Phone 7Replies: 5Last Post: 06-30-2011, 05:51 PM
- By MrKhaki in forum Windows Phone 7Replies: 2Last Post: 06-01-2011, 11:56 PM
- By jalb in forum Windows Phone 7Replies: 1Last Post: 05-02-2011, 10:47 PM