View Poll Results: Will you wait fornthe surface pro?
- 98. You may not vote on this poll
Yes, without a doubt
No, I'll get the best launch x86 tablet
No, I'll settle for a surface RT
It depends on how good or bad other launch tablets are.
- 07-10-2012, 01:36 PM #1
I really want a surface pro. Very, very badly. But, if Windows 8 comes out in October as expected, and the surface pro doesn't launch until 3 months later, we are talking a January launch. That is 6 months from now and 7 months after it was shown off. Why is Microsoft forcing such a long wait? If I decide i want an x86 tablet and not an ARM tablet, i likely will not wait for the surface pro. I need a new computer now and holding off till October for a tablet is hard enough. There is no way i can wait till January. It seems to me that the x86 surface should be the easier of the two as it is what windows has been doing for decades. So what about you, are you willing to wait three months extra or are you going to get the first good x86 tablet released?
Odds are I will settle for a surface rt and upgrade our family desktop to Windows 8 Pro (it has release preview now) for the very few legacy programs we use.
Last edited by jdevenberg; 07-10-2012 at 01:43 PM.
- 07-10-2012, 11:28 PM #5
I think ms should tick off the OEM's. Maybe then they will make better products. If the surface pro was a launch device, and turned out to be the ottest selling x86 tablet, it would show HP, dell, Lenovo and the rest that they seriously need to step up their game.
07-11-2012, 09:35 AM #6
- 144 Posts
They do need to step up their game and showing this off 3-6 months in advance gives the hardware manufacturers a bit of time to refine their current plans.
For all we know HP, Dell, and Lenovo have sent in their prototypes for W8 portables and Microsoft said "You know what, we weren't going to show this off until it was closer to being released, but we really need to light some fires here". Hence the early preview.
Also explains the lack of details regarding pricing and such. I like the Surface and I'm pretty sure that I'll end up with it but if another company comes out with a convertible laptop that is like an ultrabook with a pen, touch screen, and swivel hinge that lets you fold the screen back over the keyboard I'll probably get that instead.
- 07-11-2012, 12:02 PM #7
cause it might not be ready?If your looking for Information, be sure to check out: WindowsPhone: Getting started!
If one of our Members helps you, be sure to THANK him or her!
- 07-11-2012, 01:37 PM #8
- 07-15-2012, 03:08 AM #9
Personally, I've been waiting to get a tablet for a good while now.....
After seeing the "crap" that Android and Apple have; and seeing what MS offer in this Surface Pro.... Waiting a few months longer is no big deal for me...
I do wish though they started publishing actual details of the Pro (i.e. CPU, RAM etc etc) as with this being X86 and I'm wanting this to use it in Desktop mode; these values will help determine what I will be able to run.
Will there be X86 Tablets that are better? Most probably....
The Surface will be like my HD7, and probably X86 tablets AFTER Surface release will probably be more like the Lumias in regards to the "Generations"
- 07-16-2012, 11:41 AM #10
Tablets with x86 already exist, but this one has maybe be optimized and so on, blah blah blah, haha. Won't buy anything others, because IMO this one will be totally designed for Windows 8 and the RT edition too, not as the existing tablets. If you know what I mean.. :)
- 07-17-2012, 12:23 AM #11
I'm getting both, the Surface RT and then the Pro. The RT I'll give to my husband when I get the Pro.
One reason for the delay would be not to upset OEMs as RT is a new product on new chipset without any idea of success or eventually market size. x86 is tried and true, albeit not in tablets and is in my opinion a harder pill for OEMs to swallow.
Another reason is a little truth to the Digitimes rumor that the case is so unique that its having difficulties or will take time to ramp up production. So come out with the cheaper product first (which uses less metal) and what they believe to be the long term bigger seller. Geeks obviously drool over the pro, but for most consumers willing to walk away from legacy apps (as they would have to if went from Windows 7 to say an Android or iPad tablet) then Surface RT will be the logical choice.
07-25-2012, 02:54 AM #13
- 31 Posts
There was some talk of the reason being for the delay was due to Mircosoft waiting to skip Ivy Bridge and go straight to Hanwell to get the battery life to compete with the iPad better.
For me I'm waiting for the Pro version as I want a full OS as I've currently got a 3G iPad and a wifi W500 running Windows 8 and I can say apart from the connectivity, it's the Acer device I prefer. Looking like sticking in a mouse when dealing with spreedsheets or a keyboard whn I want to type. The iPad just doesn't suit my needs. It's too restrictive and personally have had a few issues with the hardware being faulty that have coloured my view.
- 07-25-2012, 12:01 PM #16
- 07-26-2012, 10:11 AM #17
08-07-2012, 06:29 AM #18
- 31 Posts
My partner brought me a keyboard case that (just) fits my W500 in so it feels very similar to have the Surface will be but just not as well implemented.
However I would rather have the Surface Pro over the W510 (which is the RT) or the W700 (Pro version) because of the stand and keyboard covers. However a lot depends on the specs of the Surface vs other W8 tablets as I want a proper replacement tablet for my laptop which is only be kept as the major device at home with the wifi and to run Adobe Illustrator 6 on (something I doubt any tablet will run well for now).
- 08-13-2012, 11:54 PM #20
I've been thinking lately, and I actually just posted this status on Twitter:
The reason Apple has so much success is because they deliver their product within days of announcing. No promises, just substance.
I think they should've waited. I definitely want a Surface Pro for college. It will replace my laptop and then I'll get a high end desktop for Photoshop/Gaming/Video Editing.
08-19-2012, 08:01 AM #21
- 1,032 Posts
I think Microsoft wanted to announce something to generate the buzz, and they were quite successful. Unfortunately, only enthusiasts are still talking about it right now. They needed to gradually release information about it during this time rather than sit on it for months.
10-02-2012, 08:12 AM #22
- 12 Posts
I know it's been a while since anybody replied to this thread but I just thought of something which might be relevant.
First of all, does anybody know if Microsoft has confirmed the processor which will power the surface pro? Because in light of the recent announcement by Intel about their SOC (clover trail), I was thinking that is why Microsoft is waiting: they wanted the surface pro to also have things like connected standby, but for that they need a SOC, no?
I'm probably wrong but I really hope the surface pro will have features like connected stand by. In fact, that's probably the only thing which will put me off buying a surface pro immediately.
10-02-2012, 09:02 AM #24
- 1,669 Posts
Edit: they probably did anyways, but at least this way they have a better shot.