Welcome to the Windows Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Results 1 to 22 of 22
Like Tree5Likes
  • 2 Post By Brad Spry
  • 1 Post By zeronoise
  • 2 Post By deepu424
  1. zeronoise's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    45 Posts
       #1  
    So to put it simply s4 caps at 20 megapixels so this chipset is either an s4 + dedicated camera chip or s400(I don't know the cap on s400) thoughts?
  2. Laura Knotek's Avatar

    Posts
    17,402 Posts
    Global Posts
    32,949 Global Posts
    PIN
    Email
    #2  
    All of the details should be available tomorrow.
  3. zeronoise's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    45 Posts
       #3  
    Quote Originally Posted by Laura Knotek View Post
    All of the details should be available tomorrow.
    I know...can't go to sleep anymore....
  4. Brad Spry's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    15 Posts
    #4  
    I heard it's an AMD 486 DX-40 with a Cyrix math co-processor. I'm overjoyed :-)

    Looking forward to the announcement too. Less than 12 hours now.
    a5cent and zeronoise like this.
  5. zeronoise's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    45 Posts
       #5  
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad Spry View Post
    I heard it's an AMD 486 DX-40 with a Cyrix math co-processor. I'm overjoyed :-)

    Looking forward to the announcement too. Less than 12 hours now.
    OMG! Source? that would be amazing
    Brad Spry likes this.
  6. EchoRedux's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    139 Posts
    #6  
    S4 caps at 20mp? Source please.
  7. tissotti's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    1,106 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,107 Global Posts
    #7  
    Quote Originally Posted by EchoRedux View Post
    S4 caps at 20mp? Source please.
    Google is a amazing thing.
    Snapdragon S4 Product Specs

    There's no other SoC than 800 that supports 41MP. When 808 was out there was none, why Nokia made a custom setup.
  8. maverick786us's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    823 Posts
    Global Posts
    825 Global Posts
    #8  
    Too bad I was expecting Snapdragon 800 with this device.
    (Gaming Rig)
    CPU............................Intel E8400 @ 3.6Ghz
    Mobo....................................ASUS P5Q Pro
    RAM.............................4GB G.Skill DDR2 800
    HDD................................WD 6400AAKS HDD
    GPU............................MSI Cyclone GTX 460
    PSU..............................Corsair 650TX 650W
    Case..............................................CM 690
    Display...................Dell SP2208WFP (22 inch)
    O.S.........................Windows 7 Ultimatum 64
  9. vlad0's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    1,039 Posts
    #9  
    snap 800 will be next gen platform I guess.. after blue ships

    I can't wait to learn what they did.. I am betting on a additional GPU inside the camera module, just like on the 808
  10. MAkhdar's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    107 Posts
    #10  
    It is official it has a 1.5GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4.
  11. rhamblet's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    66 Posts
    Global Posts
    72 Global Posts
    #11  
    Copied from another thread.
    1.5GHz Dual-core Snapdragon S4......
    S4!!!!!.....

    WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE INFORM NOKIA THAT THEY SHOULDNT BE USING 2+ YEAR OLD SOC's IN THEIR FLAGSHIP DEVICES

    and if I hear 1 more ***** proclaim "well windows phone doesn't need 4 cores" YES IT FREAKING DOES, the adreno 320/330 is SO much better than the 225 and its pointless to throw away the extra power when they both use the same amount. WP8 browsing need more pep in its step and a faster CPU would handle that.

    I really, really wanted this phone, but it looks like I'll save my contract upgrades for something like a 930. BUT SO HELP ME GOD IF THEY PUT IN AN S4 I WILL LOSE MY MIND.

    /rant
  12. #12  
    Quote Originally Posted by rhamblet View Post
    Copied from another thread.
    1.5GHz Dual-core Snapdragon S4......
    S4!!!!!.....

    WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE INFORM NOKIA THAT THEY SHOULDNT BE USING 2+ YEAR OLD SOC's IN THEIR FLAGSHIP DEVICES

    and if I hear 1 more ***** proclaim "well windows phone doesn't need 4 cores" YES IT FREAKING DOES, the adreno 320/330 is SO much better than the 225 and its pointless to throw away the extra power when they both use the same amount. WP8 browsing need more pep in its step and a faster CPU would handle that.

    I really, really wanted this phone, but it looks like I'll save my contract upgrades for something like a 930. BUT SO HELP ME GOD IF THEY PUT IN AN S4 I WILL LOSE MY MIND.

    /rant
    I have a 4+ year old CPU in my gaming desktop and it runs faster than most CPUs available today. Why upgrade?

    The reason for this is because it is unnecessary. Sure, we all want to see low power quad cores but a pissing contest in hardware gets you nowhere. It's the user experience that matters.
  13. rhamblet's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    66 Posts
    Global Posts
    72 Global Posts
    #13  
    Your desktop PC is not thermally constraint though and doesn't need good battery life. The problem is, this is like Nokia selling you a 4+ year old CPU when everyone else is using current CPU's, but for the same price. Yes, they all run Windows fine but obviously you want the one with the most performance, faster browsing, and a longer life for your device. Nokia could have also adopted a newer CPU with similar performance and less power consumption (more advanced dual-core) but instead picked the oldest CPU possible. 9 Months into WP8 and we still have the same hardware being sold as a "flagship" shipped with different gimmicks. Unnacceptable. I'm going to have to wait for the 930 and I really didn't want to.
  14. harishm92's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    7 Posts
    #14  
    but when the s4 does not support 41 mp then how are they gonna do it?
  15. rhamblet's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    66 Posts
    Global Posts
    72 Global Posts
    #15  
    Quote Originally Posted by harishm92 View Post
    but when the s4 does not support 41 mp then how are they gonna do it?

    Like they did with the 808 PureView, 1ghz ARM 11 CPU + dedicated image processor
  16. rhamblet's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    66 Posts
    Global Posts
    72 Global Posts
    #17  
    Looks like I gotta hang onto my 822 a while longer :/
    $299 = absolute dealbreaker with those specs

    Now we can start waiting on the 930 :)
  17. nblew's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    4 Posts
    #18  
    Quote Originally Posted by rhamblet View Post
    Looks like I gotta hang onto my 822 a while longer :/
    $299 = absolute dealbreaker with those specs

    Now we can start waiting on the 930 :)
    Yeah I agree $299 is pretty expensive, I guess unless you consider the 41MP camera that MIGHT make up for the price - but still for a phone that's super expensive. Also, 32GB seems like hardly any memory - especially if you're saving a 5MP and a 38MP image with every shot that you take...

    I think I'm going to get one though since my contract is up and my 920 screen is cracked :/
  18. deepu424's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    34 Posts
    Global Posts
    40 Global Posts
    #19  
    Why do people feel it's costly...the Iphone 5 comes for the same price for a 32 GB Model...and S4-16 GB is also 199
    a5cent and Azzid like this.
  19. Nick_1020's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    941 Posts
    Global Posts
    951 Global Posts
    #20  
    It's a little disappointing that the 1020 is going to miss out on better hardware specs but this is what Nokia do.

    As things stand, I still want a 1020 but things can change rather quickly in the mobile world so who knows what will happen over the next few months?
  20. Slater_GS's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    75 Posts
    #21  
    Quote Originally Posted by rhamblet View Post
    Looks like I gotta hang onto my 822 a while longer :/
    $299 = absolute dealbreaker with those specs

    Now we can start waiting on the 930 :)
    How were you going to get this anyways?
    Aren't you on VZW, or were you planning on jumping to AT&T? I have an 822 and no way of getting the 1020 on VZW AFAIK, but if you find out let me know!
    I'd upgrade with those specs just for the camera if I had the option. But alas, no option for me. Would I like higher specs? Sure. But the camera will trounce anything on the market and the phone operation itself is fantastic.
    And $299 (an extra $100) over 2 years is an issue, really people? People can't handle an extra ~$4 a month for this awesome phone?
  21. rhamblet's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    66 Posts
    Global Posts
    72 Global Posts
    #22  
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater_GS View Post
    How were you going to get this anyways?
    Aren't you on VZW, or were you planning on jumping to AT&T? I have an 822 and no way of getting the 1020 on VZW AFAIK, but if you find out let me know!
    I'd upgrade with those specs just for the camera if I had the option. But alas, no option for me. Would I like higher specs? Sure. But the camera will trounce anything on the market and the phone operation itself is fantastic.
    And $299 (an extra $100) over 2 years is an issue, really people? People can't handle an extra ~$4 a month for this awesome phone?
    I'm on AT&T, I picked up a bad ESN 822 on Craigslist for $100, it's GSM unlocked :)

Similar Threads

  1. Nokia EOS on AIO Wireless in USA?
    By WP8fan in forum Nokia Lumia 1020
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-10-2013, 05:10 PM
  2. EOS most important feature - RAM
    By EchoRedux in forum Nokia Lumia 1020
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-16-2013, 02:38 AM
  3. How will the competition counter the EOS?
    By calfee20 in forum Nokia Lumia 1020
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-11-2013, 12:26 PM
  4. 3D rendering of Nokia EOS or Lumia 1020
    By TechAbstract in forum Nokia Lumia 1020
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-10-2013, 12:53 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-10-2013, 08:51 AM

Posting Permissions