Get ready for beta!

Prepare for Halo Wars 2 Blitz Mode beta: Everything you need to know!

One Windows

Microsoft is building a new Windows 10 Shell for PC, Mobile and Xbox

On the Inside

Everything you need to know about the Xbox Insider Program

Beautiful compromises

Surface Studio review: you'll want one, even if you don't need one

3-in-1

Is this the Surface Phone? Microsoft awarded patents for foldable devices

Windows Central Offers

MCSE Certification bundle is just $39

Even more improvements

All the changes found in Windows 10 build 15007!

Games as a Service

What does the cancellation of Scalebound mean for future Xbox exclusives?

Windows Central Offers

Save $90 on these FRESHeBUDS Pro Magnetic Bluetooth Earbuds

Returning for 2017

We're back with an new episode of #AskDanWindows

Lifetime Subscription

VPNSecure is currently 91% off

Our favorite things

The Best of CES 2017 Awards

Infinity Edge in your hand

The XPS 13 2-in-1 is the Dell convertible we've always wanted

Project Valerie

Razer just made a laptop with three — THREE! — 17-inch 4K displays. 😱

Great design from Palo Alto

HP's CES 2017 releases are truly gorgeous PCs

Intel and Google's big day

CES 2017 Day Two: New laptops, new phones, and old ideas made new

Take five is better than ever

The updated Lenovo ThinkPad X1 packs Kaby Lake chips and zero bloatware

Everything we know about the next Xbox: Project Scorpio

UWPowered

'Game Mode' for Windows 10 will power Xbox One and Scorpio games too

Buyer's guide

Best accessories for Microsoft Surface Book

< >
Welcome to the Windows Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. Perus's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    38 Posts
    Global Posts
    134 Global Posts
       #1  
    Hello,

    Firstly I hesitated a bit before posting this but cannot accept this difference without some kind of rational explanation.
    Please view attached screenshots which more or less shows the big difference in 3G reception between a brand new 820 and a SGS3.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	wp_ss_20130105_0002.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	49.7 KB 
ID:	26252Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot_2013-01-05-21-22-06.png 
Views:	8 
Size:	98.2 KB 
ID:	26251
    They are on the same carrier, same location and cell ID (240-05) and have been this way since unpacked a couple of days ago.
    Another thing is that on GSM/EDGE and LTE the signal is strong and "normal" compared to other devices.

    Is this normal or should I ask for a replacement?

    Maybe someone else have noticed the same?

    /Per
  2. Daniel Ratcliffe's Avatar
    Retired Moderator

    Posts
    3,046 Posts
    Global Posts
    4,703 Global Posts
    #2  
    First of all, it is worth noting that different OEMs have different interpretations of strong and weak signal. Is the perceived weaker signal affecting your data speeds?
  3. Perus's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    38 Posts
    Global Posts
    134 Global Posts
       #3  
    Of course, there are always two sides of a coin but the RSCP value shouldn't diff that much between manufacturers and also I just had the opportunity to measure the same thing with an IP5 and the results were the same. It doesn't affect the speed more than switching to EDGE more often than necessary compared to the other devices.

    /Per
  4. Trappiste's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    41 Posts
    Global Posts
    65 Global Posts
    #4  
    Lumia 900 does the same on the 2100 band. Performance is poor, signal levels are low, and any other 3G phone can maintain a much stronger, more stable signal. They never fall off to EDGE while L900 does it regularly. It seems Nokia's antenna design has become shockingly poor. I have already decided I won't be getting another Nokia. Either I'll go for a HTC-branded WP 8 device, which though lack all the Nokia software, or move, for that reason, to Android.
  5. Perus's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    38 Posts
    Global Posts
    134 Global Posts
       #5  
    That was not what I hoped for. Earlier I had the 920 for almost a month and noted similar behaviour with 3G reception but hoped (again) it was something else than Nokias fault.

    Tomorrow I'm going to a city where they have LTE on the 2600Mhz band and hopefully it's as good as it's on the 800Mhz band regarding reception. Shorter distance taken into consideration of course ;)

    If the 8X had 4G/LTE the choice would have been easier...

    /Per
  6. Daniel Ratcliffe's Avatar
    Retired Moderator

    Posts
    3,046 Posts
    Global Posts
    4,703 Global Posts
    #6  
    Quote Originally Posted by Perus View Post
    If the 8X had 4G/LTE the choice would have been easier...
    I'm gonna take a shot in the dark and presume you're British.
  7. Perus's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    38 Posts
    Global Posts
    134 Global Posts
       #7  
    Quote Originally Posted by Paladinleeds View Post
    I'm gonna take a shot in the dark and presume you're British.
    Quite close, I'm a Swede ;)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 345
    Last Post: 12-12-2012, 11:44 AM
  2. Replies: 68
    Last Post: 12-11-2012, 11:31 PM
  3. Confirmed! No gorilla glass on the 820 :(
    By addman in forum Nokia Lumia 820
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 09-15-2012, 11:03 AM
  4. Sim on the way, ready to take the dive
    By Menno in forum Windows Phone 7
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-17-2012, 06:39 PM

Posting Permissions