TBH 830 is already overpriced and there shouldn't have been such a big difference between the 830 and 730 prices in the first place... Besides if this is really a cheaper 830 then it would possibly lose the OIS and metal ring and if that is the case then I don't see why anyone would want to buy this over a 730.
And in a few months time 830 will definitely drop its price big time so it will be interesting to see how this phone will be priced without being too close to 730.
I totally agree with you! Here in my country, Lumia 735 costs 175 $, while 830 used to cost 499 $, now 396 $. Lumia 735 is clearly amazing value for the money
I don't know. The article said it's "a cheaper alternative" to the 830 so for all we know it could be like a 730 with different compromises, e.g. bigger screen, better rear camera but worse ffc