Welcome to the Windows Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By entropism
  1. Lumia2012's Avatar

    17 Posts
    I was in the AT&T store today and saw the difference between the screen on the 920 and my current 900 (as well as the new 820). The 920 doesn't have ClearBlack and it shows. The colors on the 900/820 are darker & richer, not to mention the blacks are deeper and blend with the rest of the phone. Looking at cyan for example, the 920 color is noticeably lighter, a pale version of what cyan looks like on the 900/820.

    I know we are getting a great screen and other upgrades on the 920, but does anyone else feel that we're losing something with the ClearBlack gone?? I know Daniel mentioned it in his review, but I find it a shame when I consider switching to a 920.
  2. Lenas's Avatar

    35 Posts
    920 does have ClearBlack tech. You're talking about AMOLED, which the 820 has and the 920 does not. AMOLED has better blacks, yes, but also other downsides that TFT does not. There is no clear winner, it's a matter of taste.
  3. KoukiFC3S's Avatar

    554 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,781 Global Posts
    AMOLED vs LCD. The 920's screen still looks amazing in the sun, so I'm really satisfied.
  4. holyxiaoxin's Avatar

    76 Posts
    Global Posts
    87 Global Posts
    So where's the Daniel reviewer that you just mentioned? I would like to see his review, his tech knowledge about the reviewed product is pathetic.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. socialcarpet's Avatar

    1,893 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,966 Global Posts
    ClearBlack is there, but AMOLED is not. I miss the inky blacks and more vibrant colors a bit too. But the extra resolution and everything else are MORE than worth it. I suspect there just weren't any AMOLED screens in the resolution Nokia needed maybe. Not really sure of what the advantages of IPS are aside from an improved viewing angle, which is meaningless on a cell phone if you ask me. AMOLED is a better fit for the black intensive dark theme of WP and it uses less energy too. I see no disadvantages there. Still I got over the less black blacks and less colorful colors after a few days and I'm alright with it now. I still hope the successor to the 920 goes back to AMOLED though.
  6. entropism's Avatar

    58 Posts
    Global Posts
    168 Global Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by socialcarpet View Post
    it uses less energy too. .
    Potentially, but in real world scenarios it actually uses more. After having 5 Samsung android phones in a row, I'm very glad to not have a SAMOLED screen for a bit.
    holyxiaoxin likes this.

Similar Threads

  1. completely confused between Lumia 920 and HTC 8X
    By AnIrudha in forum Nokia Lumia 920
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 10-26-2012, 11:48 AM
  2. How the Lumia 920 wins and fails compared to the iPhone 5.
    By Simon Tupper in forum Upcoming & Rumored Windows Phones
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-04-2012, 06:32 PM
  3. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 09-27-2012, 09:47 AM
  4. predict unlocked prices for the nokia lumia 920 and lumia 820
    By geekmaster in forum Upcoming & Rumored Windows Phones
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-19-2012, 04:32 PM
  5. Post photos and videos taken with the Lumia 920
    By Mitlov in forum Upcoming & Rumored Windows Phones
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-05-2012, 07:30 PM

Posting Permissions