I have a few gripes about it so far:
1. It would be great if it could recognize my contacts' names and grab their addresses instead of having to copy & paste the address (or click the address to view in Bing)
2. It would be great if at the end of the "Trip" that it could display the address because the "Approximate" location can be between 4 houses (both sides of the street), which can lead to some confusion. The little checkered-flag doesn't do much because it is displayed in the middle of the road, not over the actual destination's address.
3. When it tells you to enter/merge onto the highway, it doesn't say in which direction. Perhaps it isn't a big deal if I can view the map's general direction, but if I am reading the text directions via Nokia Maps (not Drive, but they both operate the same way) it doesn't say N, S, E, W. It would be great if it did (especially at a "Fork").
4. It tells me to take a street exit, but it would be very helpful to know the exit number, so I know how soon it is. Yes, there is a "Distance", but knowing the number is helpful as well.
With all of this in mind, I will say that neither Maps nor Drive are perfect in my opinion. Using Drive/Maps I am batting .500 so far. Yesterday night I used Drive to go somewhere and it told me to "Stay left and take the exit" on 480W in Cleveland, OH. There was a "Fork" in this area where there was an exit on the right, but to "Continue" you go left. I wasn't sure as to how the connection was, as this was right after a spot where 480 was merged with another highway, so I stayed left (as per the verbal instructions). It then told me to make a right turn directly under a bridge where there was no right turn. Thus, I had to turn around at the next exit and follow what should have been a "Keep RIGHT and take the exit" sort of situation. That said, the route it took me was long and ridiculous.
I just found where I can switch the "Smart routing" (options being "Faster route", "Shorter route", and "Economical route"...not sure what "Economical route" means compared to the other two), but it doesn't appear to make any difference, as it doesn't take traffic into account, as if it did, the route would be different when I choose "Shorter" versus" Faster" (all three are showing the same route at the moment, where Google is currently showing that this route would take me 50 minutes at the moment, whereas their "Default" would take 45).
So even if the "Smart routing" worked properly, this doesn't appear to carry over to Maps, and Maps doesn't have the ability to set this, either!
Overall, this is very poor, in my opinion. :unhappy: Perhaps the biggest issue I have with the 920 thus far.