Get ready for beta!

Prepare for Halo Wars 2 Blitz Mode beta: Everything you need to know!

One Windows

Microsoft is building a new Windows 10 Shell for PC, Mobile and Xbox

On the Inside

Everything you need to know about the Xbox Insider Program

Beautiful compromises

Surface Studio review: you'll want one, even if you don't need one

3-in-1

Is this the Surface Phone? Microsoft awarded patents for foldable devices

Windows Central Offers

MCSE Certification bundle is just $39

Even more improvements

All the changes found in Windows 10 build 15007!

Games as a Service

What does the cancellation of Scalebound mean for future Xbox exclusives?

Windows Central Offers

Save $90 on these FRESHeBUDS Pro Magnetic Bluetooth Earbuds

Returning for 2017

We're back with an new episode of #AskDanWindows

Lifetime Subscription

VPNSecure is currently 91% off

Our favorite things

The Best of CES 2017 Awards

Infinity Edge in your hand

The XPS 13 2-in-1 is the Dell convertible we've always wanted

Project Valerie

Razer just made a laptop with three — THREE! — 17-inch 4K displays. 😱

Great design from Palo Alto

HP's CES 2017 releases are truly gorgeous PCs

Intel and Google's big day

CES 2017 Day Two: New laptops, new phones, and old ideas made new

Take five is better than ever

The updated Lenovo ThinkPad X1 packs Kaby Lake chips and zero bloatware

Everything we know about the next Xbox: Project Scorpio

UWPowered

'Game Mode' for Windows 10 will power Xbox One and Scorpio games too

Buyer's guide

Best accessories for Microsoft Surface Book

< >
Welcome to the Windows Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. michail71's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    1,821 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,844 Global Posts
       #1  
    I did some test yesterday to see if noise reduction could be the cause of the overly soft photos we are all seeing from this phone. It was a crude test but I did a test shot at ISO 100 and then another at ISO 400. This test shot had a bit of fine detail in it. Anyway, the ISO 100 shot looked sharper, but still not as sharp as it should be. The ISO 400 shot looked very soft in comparison.

    It's possible the noise reduction is kicking in too high at the higher ISO levels since noise should go up with ISO.

    Would anyone else like to test this theory out?

    I'll try to get my test shots up later.
  2. pjeung's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    111 Posts
    #2  
    somebody said that a while back.. i remember cuz i have my ISO set at 100... daytime pictures aren't immaculate, but they are passable =)
  3. cameradork's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    562 Posts
    #3  
    We're not going to know until someone starts messing around with API. I poked around on the dev sites, and I think it's not that big of an issue (for someone who knows what they're doing) to write an app that extracts the raw data prior to compression. I don't know enough about code to try it myself. Once we can get the raw data to use as a baseline, we can start making real comparisons.
  4. joeynox's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    578 Posts
    Global Posts
    616 Global Posts
    #4  
    u can visually see the phone applying the softness to the pictures as u take it. i dont undertsand how people are getting sharp pictures. i had my phone mounteted to a tripod and tapped the screena nd it still did the exact same thing. the detail between a iphone 4,4s,5 and l920 is night and day
  5. congusano's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    381 Posts
    Global Posts
    382 Global Posts
    #5  
    Quote Originally Posted by joeynox View Post
    u can visually see the phone applying the softness to the pictures as u take it. i dont undertsand how people are getting sharp pictures. i had my phone mounteted to a tripod and tapped the screena nd it still did the exact same thing. the detail between a iphone 4,4s,5 and l920 is night and day
    The phone excels with macros, low light and night time photography. It needs some tweaking with the daylight photo's. i believe also that it is just an over zealous use of noise reduction AND jpeg compression.
  6. jdhooghe's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    529 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,677 Global Posts
    #6  
    Leave the poor horse alone.
  7. michail71's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    1,821 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,844 Global Posts
       #7  
    The first thing I photographed with the phone was a horse. I thought the picture looked rather soft before reading any of these threads.
  8. michail71's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    1,821 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,844 Global Posts
       #8  
    I contacted support on this and let them know about these issues with jpeg compression and noise reduction. It should be interesting to see how (or if) they respond.
  9. joeynox's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    578 Posts
    Global Posts
    616 Global Posts
    #9  
    I just left an att store because a friend wanted the galaxy express and played around with the 8x. Wow now that's a camera that produces sharp images. It'd also so light. I hope Nokia fixes this issue an all of the other issues because they release a 930 or a new phone. The galaxy express is nice and the 5mp camera is really good. Low like was well also. Samsung makes phones really well. Besides the soft image the only other thing that bothers me with the camera is the white balance and the constant changing of balance

Similar Threads

  1. I think WP8 is on its way to success.
    By Ruined in forum Windows Phone 8
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-21-2012, 02:21 AM
  2. I'm thinking it is time to change WPCentral a more MS-centric name. :)
    By Judge_Daniel in forum Site Feedback & Help
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-06-2012, 09:50 PM

Posting Permissions