Welcome to the Windows Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 67
Like Tree12Likes
  1. michail71's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    651 Posts
    #26  
    I'm starting to think the camera has better abilities than it is getting credit for. I took a few shots last night that I thought looked soft. I then retook them using the flash and they were really sharp, sharper than I had seen the camera take before. Also, the flash exposures looked really good. I tend to not like flash so I usually have it turned off.

    I examined the exif data and noticed a faster shutter speed was used and ISO 100. I'm thinking the camera is favoring longer exposures since it has optical IS and applying aggressive noise reduction at higher ISOs. I think that can be tweaked in firmware and also through careful choice of composition and camera settings.

    All in all, this phone will pull off a shot in conditions most would have a throw away (or no shot). This may be in part some of the phone is getting bad press.

    Anyway, there is a reason I have an slr camera with lenses that cost more than the full price of this phone :).
  2. justsimpleinfo's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    22 Posts
    Global Posts
    23 Global Posts
    #27  
    Great Video. I am debating on if I want to get the 920.... Dev version. So I can use it on T Mo, that video is great, it means I will be able to take some great Videos of my kids.
  3. karmamule's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    189 Posts
    Global Posts
    546 Global Posts
    #28  
    I'm really happy with the camera, not just for low-light but in capturing things that other cell phone cameras have had trouble with. For example I have a dark tortoiseshell cat that my previous cell phone cameras have had trouble capturing facial detail for, but when I just used all auto settings, no post-processing or flash or anything, my 920 was able to capture lots of detail in a close-up of her. Photos from previous cameras may have been a touch sharper, but her face always appeared darker and muddier, so I'll take that trade-off any day.


    spiffy.jpg


    Full photo on Skydrive
  4. sarlo100's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    7 Posts
    Global Posts
    41 Global Posts
    #29  
    This is still a 1/3" sensor, (significantly) smaller than even the el-cheapo point and shoot cameras out there (1/2.3", generally). That, and by all accounts, Nokia hopelessly crippled the camera controls. Low light shooting is tricky enough with a proper camera, even something like a Panasonic LX7 is going to give grainy photos unless the person behind the controls knows what they are doing.

    That being said, these pictures don't look bad...for what they are - cell phone pictures. Expecting miracles with a sensor as small as my infant son's fingernail and nearly 9 million pixels stuffed on it isn't terribly realistic. The very best of this generation's point and shoot cameras (Oly XZ-2, Panny LX7, Canon G15, Fuji X10), with ultra fast lenses and sensors five or six times larger than the Nokia 920's start breaking down above ISO 800.
  5. cameradork's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    555 Posts
    #30  
    I love the camera in the 920. I think it's great for a cellie, and the low-light capabilities allow me to capture things I haven't been able to with other phones in situations where I can't have or don't want to have any of my "real" cameras.
  6. vlad0's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    1,035 Posts
    #31  
    Quote Originally Posted by sarlo100 View Post
    This is still a 1/3" sensor, (significantly) smaller than even the el-cheapo point and shoot cameras out there (1/2.3", generally).
    Spot on.. with the current imaging tech, the most important factor is the sensor size, which is directly related to pixel size.. the bigger the sensor, the bigger the pixels, more photons collected.. better image quality. Of course, that is very roughly put.. but generally that is the way.

    I actually think that the camera industry has been misleading people with the megapixel war for years now. They should have started advertising sensor sizes or pixels sizes instead of megapixel count. I feel like once we reached 5-6Mpix range, there was really no reason to go further up in megapixels, but rather enlarge the sensors. What they did was keep raising the megapixels count, but kept the sensor sizes pretty much the same...

    As soon as they published the white paper on PV phase 2 I knew that we shouldn't expect anything above average .. considering the sensor size, there is only so much you can do, and for that.. Nokia did an amazing job in low light, at least in terms of exposure control.. the quality is still not very good, but that is to be expected.

    As far as point&shoots.. I would take Nokia's phase 1 device over any of them. The only one that I would even consider is the Sony RX100, but that is still $650 and its only a.. camera.. with phase 1 you are paying $500 for a proper smartphone and a proper camera. The P&S industry is done.. at least at their current price points.. it reminds of the current state of the PC industry.
  7. barracuda1187's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    35 Posts
    #32  
    Quote Originally Posted by karmamule View Post
    For example I have a dark tortoiseshell cat that my previous cell phone cameras have had trouble capturing facial detail for
    I have two tortoiseshells, and they're about 90% of the reason I chose this phone.
    karmamule likes this.
  8. #33  
    WPCentral posted that there is a sharpness issue, and Nokia is fixing it. Hopefully it comes soon.
  9. sarlo100's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    7 Posts
    Global Posts
    41 Global Posts
    #34  
    Quote Originally Posted by vlad0 View Post
    .
    I actually think that the camera industry has been misleading people with the megapixel war for years now. They should have started advertising sensor sizes or pixels sizes instead of megapixel count. I feel like once we reached 5-6Mpix range, there was really no reason to go further up in megapixels, but rather enlarge the sensors. What they did was keep raising the megapixels count, but kept the sensor sizes pretty much the same...

    The only one that I would even consider is the Sony RX100, but that is still $650 and its only a.. camera.. with phase 1 you are paying $500 for a proper smartphone and a proper camera. The P&S industry is done.. at least at their current price points.. it reminds of the current state of the PC industry.
    The megapixel war was outright destructive, not merely a disservice. You are absolutely right, the pixel count for any P&S should have been capped at 6MP, and each generation should have worked on a cleaner, larger sensor and/or a faster lens - which is the current "in vogue" thing. At least the faster lenses are useful, as opposed to what they were doing - stuffing 16MP onto a sensor the size of half a postage stamp. The Fuji F31 was as good as it got for (P&S) high ISO shooting (which, in reality, wasn't all that good), and it still took the industry years before they even matched the F31 at anything above ISO 400 because of the insane MP war.

    No cell phone shooter outside of a Nokia 808 should have anything above 4MP. Even that is probably too high. People have no real understanding why their pictures are so flat. Well, when you have pixel size so ridiculously small, you pay a real penalty - as in, either you have a blue(ish) sky and shadow areas that look black, or shadow areas that can be seen (albeit as a noisy mess), and a blown out, all white sky.

    I loved the cell phone pundits who declared the Titan II at 16MP had "the best camera" due to the increased pixel count. I laughed, and then I cringed when I read what they had to say. 16MP on a 1/3" sensor?!? Oh my...Then I got sad when I realized the masses bought that tripe.

    I am hopeful Nokia combines the 920 body with the 808 shooter (I'll live with the bulge), and I think I'm going to hold out for the second generation of WP8 phones. I'm happy enough with my Focus S for now.
  10. ibbyj's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    253 Posts
    Global Posts
    413 Global Posts
    #35  
    This is not a DSLR.

    Other than an 808, what phone has a better camera?
    -Chances are, I'm guessing.
  11. contributorM's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    41 Posts
    #36  
    I'm more than satisfied. My only gripe is that I can't manually adjust the aperture settings. But with all my low light tests, the Lumia has done incredibly well.
  12. sarlo100's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    7 Posts
    Global Posts
    41 Global Posts
    #37  
    Quote Originally Posted by ibbyj View Post
    This is not a DSLR.

    Other than an 808, what phone has a better camera?
    That's pretty much the point. It's not even a P&S, either. Expectations need to be managed. The 920 does excel against its direct competition in low light, and will even more so when Nokia adds back some control over settings in the next firmware update. Daylight shooting was always going to be problematic due to the limits of the sensor. 8 or more million pixels on this size sensor was always going to yield mediocre results.

    It just seemed like far too many people thought they were carrying around a Canon 1DX in their pockets, instead of a cell phone with a couple of new tricks in its body.
    ibbyj likes this.
  13. michail71's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    651 Posts
    #38  
    I wouldn't go so far as to say expectations are too high. There are obvious firmware flaws that are severely degrading the rendered jpegs in many conditions. You can see the difference in the live viewfinder and then watch the captured image turn bad.

    I'd also personally prefer the camera software didn't try so hard to overexpose dark images and shadows. I think this tendency to overexpose kicks in when it shouldn't. But I wouldn't mind having it as an option to toggle.
  14. sarlo100's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    7 Posts
    Global Posts
    41 Global Posts
    #39  
    I would say that anybody who understands the basic tenets of photography knows what they are getting into. However, the masses who don't probably have some unrealistic expectations. This thread was built around images, which, while technically weren't that spectacular, still looked pretty darn good coming from a cell phone. Even with version 1 firmware.

    Pulling shadows up on such a small sensor is going to be problematic at best. You are correct, the ability to turn off HDR will help.

    You know what bothers me? The naming system. The fact that this model is "920", and not "1000" tells me that the phone we all *really* want is the next generation version. I have this sneaking suspicion that a Numia 1000 is just around the corner, with the real Pureview camera and a smoothed out and mature WP8 system behind it. I know, I know, you can always wait for the next, better model, but I'm still convinced that the next model in *this* case is going to be the one worth waiting for.
  15. #40  
    I find it makes a huge difference if you take the picture by tapping the screen rather than using the camera button. Also, you need to hold the phone very lightly in your hand to let the OIS do the work. This is especially true in low light. In my experimentation with low light I got results just like yours until I got the hang of how to make it focus.

    Also, keep in mind what you are focusing on. Images not in the focal plane will blur. You have to be especially careful when tapping the screen to capture as it will focus on what you tap.

    That being said, I am blown away with the results of the camera compared to my iPhone 4 and my departmental Cannon Powershot camera at work. In close up mode I am able to dramatically outperform both devices. The comparison with the full Canon camera is especially pathetic.
    Thanked by:
  16. michail71's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    651 Posts
    #41  
    Quote Originally Posted by sarlo100 View Post
    I would say that anybody who understands the basic tenets of photography knows what they are getting into. However, the masses who don't probably have some unrealistic expectations. This thread was built around images, which, while technically weren't that spectacular, still looked pretty darn good coming from a cell phone. Even with version 1 firmware.

    Pulling shadows up on such a small sensor is going to be problematic at best. You are correct, the ability to turn off HDR will help.

    You know what bothers me? The naming system. The fact that this model is "920", and not "1000" tells me that the phone we all *really* want is the next generation version. I have this sneaking suspicion that a Numia 1000 is just around the corner, with the real Pureview camera and a smoothed out and mature WP8 system behind it. I know, I know, you can always wait for the next, better model, but I'm still convinced that the next model in *this* case is going to be the one worth waiting for.
    In order for that to happen Nokia needs this model to be a big hit.
  17. socialcarpet's Avatar
    Banned

    Posts
    1,893 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,966 Global Posts
    #42  
    Quote Originally Posted by Jmaxim View Post
    I believe my BB Storm 9550 took much better pictures.
  18. JConn_Lefty's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    217 Posts
    Global Posts
    334 Global Posts
    #43  
    it's one thing to say the 920's camera might not be top-notch on the phone market but not satisfied?

    it takes more than satisfying pictures if you ask me. for a cell phone...
  19. Connie Litrenta's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    152 Posts
    Global Posts
    190 Global Posts
    #44  
    I for one have had MANY phones (Android, iOS and Blackberry), many of them top of the line and I can tell you that this Lumia has one of the best cameras around. The settings are a little lacking compared to others but nothing that future software updates can't handle but other than that, I was totally amazed by the pictures. It was one of the first things that made me sit up and take notice.
    Connie L - Windows Phone 8 always
  20. Emcee's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    43 Posts
    Global Posts
    149 Global Posts
    #45  
    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Lehtovaara View Post
    Also, keep in mind what you are focusing on. Images not in the focal plane will blur. You have to be especially careful when tapping the screen to capture as it will focus on what you tap.
    I did not know that, I have been just tapping the screen arbitrarily.
  21. joeynox's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    588 Posts
    Global Posts
    604 Global Posts
    #46  
    People need to stop sugar coating the fact that the camera isn't as good in day light as the iPhone and that's what we want. At night its great but due to the sharpness issue the phone is handicapped
    Thanked by:
    masciam and Napocensis like this.
  22. Napocensis's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    88 Posts
    #47  
    Agreed with the poor performance of the camera. It competes for the worse feature with the lack of sound profiles.
    These are two features where BB is far superior.
  23. bull2760's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    1 Posts
    #48  
    I've owned ever version of the iPhone accept for the iPhone 5 and without question this camera blows the iPhone 4s away. The optical image stabilization is awesome. I've taken pics of my kids running that are nice and clear. Could never get that with my 4s. There isn't one person that I know even with a high end dslr camera, that doesn't make adjustments after they shoot in light room. Your smoking crack if u think a iPhone 5 doesn't need correcting after the fact.
  24. Jmaxim's Avatar
    Banned

    Posts
    32 Posts
    Global Posts
    127 Global Posts
    #49  
    Quote Originally Posted by socialcarpet View Post
    And we don't care to see you gyrating.
    Last edited by Jmaxim; 12-05-2012 at 01:25 AM.
  25. ilifecomputer's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    161 Posts
    Global Posts
    209 Global Posts
    #50  
    Quote Originally Posted by James8561 View Post
    i find the AF is a fail and all pictures come out blurry. hope nokia fixes this asap
    same in daylight. sure it has nice nighttime and great video. but if you think daytime photography on this thing is awesome, you just haven't used any high end phone released in the last 3 years. hopefully it is indeed just a quick fix.

    Edit: I exaggerate a looooot. Maybe 2 years?
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dear 920, I wanted to love you, but...
    By sirwannabe in forum Phone Wars
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-24-2012, 08:09 PM
  2. I want to love the phone, but
    By herdofem in forum Samsung Focus 2
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-03-2012, 03:26 PM
  3. Who can I talk to if I want to change my username?
    By homegeek in forum The "Off Topic" Lounge
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-23-2011, 05:25 PM

Posting Permissions