Welcome to the Windows Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By aximtreo
  1. Saint Michael's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    95 Posts
    Global Posts
    99 Global Posts
       #1  
    I understand that Carl Zeiss lenses are "quality" in brand. But what does having a Carl Zeiss lens do for the Nokias? How is the lenses different from say Samsung's GS3 lenses, or/and Apple's "saphfire" lenses...
  2. George Ponder's Avatar
    Editor

    Posts
    472 Posts
    Global Posts
    473 Global Posts
    #2  
    Well... you have a major optics manufacturers scaling things down to the smartphone camera level.... it would almost be at the same level as if Canon or Nikon designed the camera itself.
    Zeiss lenses have a reputation for not only the quality material used but also the quality in the element design and placement within the lens.

    It's to the camera as Dolby was in the old days to audio or maybe Beats is to audio today?
    George Ponder
    Reviews Editor - Windows Phone Central
    Email: george.ponder@wpcentral.com
    Twitter: @coppertop004

  3. Mark Rozanski's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    39 Posts
    #3  
    Beats is nothing more than a marketing term. No real technology behind it, unlike Dolby. Zeiss optics are far superior to what other phones use for their optics. That's why Instagram(and yes, there IS an Instagram probram for WP8) is so popular, you can put a nice dress and makeup on a pig, but it's still a pig! It's like listening to people say they LOVE their Blows (oops...Bose) speakers for home theatre. Remember, "No highs, no lows ... must be Bose".
    White Lumia 920 -- AT&T
  4. Saint Michael's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    95 Posts
    Global Posts
    99 Global Posts
       #4  
    But what specifically does it improve? Sharpness? More natural coloring? I mean does the GS3 have a plastic lens? What does it effect?
    I want to be able to promote the fact that the Nokias have it, but atm all I can say is: "and it has a Carl Zeiss lens. Which is good"... If they ask why it's good, I got nothing...
    I remember Damian saying the lens on the 808 was 5times the quality of dslr lenses or something. But in what way are they of this superior quality?? It's driving me nuts. I mean it's on awesome cameras like n8, 808, 920... But also on the none top of class cameras like 900, n9, 800 etc
  5. George Ponder's Avatar
    Editor

    Posts
    472 Posts
    Global Posts
    473 Global Posts
    #5  
    Missing the connection between Zeiss lenses and Instagram....
    George Ponder
    Reviews Editor - Windows Phone Central
    Email: george.ponder@wpcentral.com
    Twitter: @coppertop004

  6. tonyk79's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    9 Posts
    #6  
    Zeiss lens are a high quality premium brand lens which often cost £1000's for a dslr camera. The glass used on the lens will be of a high quality and have special coatings to reduce flare, chromatic abrasion etc. The 808 is a good camera but will in no way compare to a dslr due to sensor size.
  7. gtbuzz's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    113 Posts
    #7  
    I think you're asking pretty much the same question as what does Canon L (their pro stuff) glass get you over some crummy 3rd party lens (ie what does a good lens get you over a bad lens). Generally speaking, you're getting improvements in things like sharpness, distortion, chromatic abberation (purple fringing), contrast, etc etc. Like others have pointed out, Zeiss is usually very high quality glass that exhibits those traits, however it's a comparitive measure, so compared to what? That's where it becomes difficult to quanity, especially on non-interchangeable lens cameras.

    Another thing that makes it difficult to really quantify is that the sensor is the other half of the equation and not all sensors are created equal. If you put a decent lens in front of a crummy sensor or a crummy lens in front of a decent sensor, results could still be wanting. Without being able to compare the Zeiss lens to anything else, exactly what you get is kind of up in the air, but that's where markting and name recognition comes in. Is it possible that the Zeiss lens is crap and we just don't know it? Sure, but it's not likely based on their heritage. All things being equal, i'd put my money on their stuff over an unknown plastic lens.
  8. conanheath's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    450 Posts
    Global Posts
    589 Global Posts
    #8  
    Marketing. That's all it is.
  9. jigibao's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    1 Posts
    #9  
    No it is not marketing,it is the best optics money can buy.When you visit specialist in hospital and he must use scope to check insides then be shure it has carl zeiss optics.and much more.my first use of old nokia N8 with 12mp camera give me first glimp in fantastic foto's and 720p cristal clear videos too.Now this days im proud i have nokia 1020 and it makes crisp foto and video and it cant be beaten by any mobile phone oor tablet oor camera..the technic behind all theis is german precision and perfection working with wery wide lens without loss of sharpnes in any point of visible field..it is a stuning flagship other mobile phones can just correct with software,wich is a lie for true fotografy,if you want realy true quality picture,carl zeiss is the way...regards.
  10. aximtreo's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    831 Posts
    Global Posts
    937 Global Posts
    #10  
    I worked for Zeiss for a few years selling their Electron Microscopes for research. At that time, Zeiss lens were known to be one of the last "glass" lens available for most optical use. Having glass lens means that they are impervious to things like heat expansion, distortion, historesis; etc. Plastic lens are subject to heat and cold expansion and contraction. That means that you lose sharpness and focus ability and overall image quality from edge to edge.

    Mind you, I'm no engineer but just having a glass lens over a plastic one means better quality and stability to me.
    Thanked by:
    Guytronic likes this.
  11. carlson03's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    141 Posts
    Global Posts
    145 Global Posts
    #11  
    Quote Originally Posted by aximtreo View Post
    I worked for Zeiss for a few years selling their Electron Microscopes for research. At that time, Zeiss lens were known to be one of the last "glass" lens available for most optical use. Having glass lens means that they are impervious to things like heat expansion, distortion, historesis; etc. Plastic lens are subject to heat and cold expansion and contraction. That means that you lose sharpness and focus ability and overall image quality from edge to edge.

    Mind you, I'm no engineer but just having a glass lens over a plastic one means better quality and stability to me.
    Is your avatar a sheltie?
    Nokia Lumia 920 AT&T
    HP TouchPad
    Nokia Lumia 520--Hot Tub Media Streamer
    HTC Titan--Sold
    Samsung Blackjack 2

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-31-2013, 01:41 PM
  2. My Nokia 822 and Carl's nice camera
    By Genserik in forum Windows Phone 8
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-16-2012, 08:18 AM
  3. Nokia Lumia 900 Carl Zeiss Metal Scratch!
    By TheDarKnight in forum Nokia Lumia 900
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-17-2012, 11:19 AM

Posting Permissions