Redefining the PC

Why Microsoft's Surface phone could be MUCH more than a mere 'phone'

Surface Pwn 5

Surface Pro 5, Project NEON details leaked on LinkedIn?

XP-YESSSSSSS

Dell's already awesome XPS 15 gets even better in 2017

Surface table meets Windows 10

Yes, we did put Windows 10 on the original Surface table ... and it rocks

Cream o' the crop

Before buying a Microsoft laptop, check out our pick for the absolute best

Simple and secure, just the way I like it

We think Windows 10 Cloud is a great idea, here's why

uber micro

Halo Wars 2 has something for everyone. Here's our full review.

Oldie but goldie

We reviewed Microsoft's decade-old Surface table

Creators Update comin' at ya

These are the coolest new features in the next big Xbox One update (video)

Buyer's guide

The Razer Blade 14 is the best laptop Razer has to offer

Windows 10 app gems

10 terrific Windows 10 apps you should be using

Tower of power

Here's what we think of Dell's XPS Tower Special Edition

Quite a deal

Grab the complete C# coding bootcamp for $41!

Your go-to laptop guide

Introducing our ultimate laptop buyer's guide

Listen here

Attn Android and iPhone users: What you need to know about Windows phone

Old is new?

The original Surface Pro still holds its own in the 2-in-1 world

Xbox Greenlight?

No, internet, Microsoft isn't opening Xbox to all UWP games

Falling in love

HP Envy 34 review: An ultrawide curved all-in-one after my heart

2015 machine in 2017?

Surface 3 still holds its own in 2017

Let Kodi cut your cord

You should be using Kodi for Windows 10

< >
Welcome to the Windows Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. BobcatRidge's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    9 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
       #1  
    Can anyone think of a reason why Nokia or HTC can't make some phones that are compatible with Verizon or any other carrier that refuses to offer some new WP7 handsets? Microsoft could sell them through their store. End users can go month-to-month with their carrier. If enough people decided to go this route, it would weaken the carriers grip on the US market.

    What do you guys think?
    Last edited by BobcatRidge; 03-06-2012 at 11:44 AM. Reason: Fix some grammer
  2. theefman's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    3,894 Posts
    Global Posts
    3,895 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #2  
    Those phones require activation to work on CDMA networks like Sprint and Verizon and that would probably never happen. As for Tmo, band incompatibility prevents that but with their refarming plans maybe wont be an issue in the near future. Beauty of GSM, bring your own phone and no one can tell you otherwise.
  3. jfa1's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    2,565 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,648 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #3  
    Any company like Nokia can make phones for Verison or Sprint or ATT or Mo or whoever. Theyw ont unless the carrier is willing to pony up the support and make a financial commitment. If they dont or wont its a failure to launch. So you cant blame Nokia or HTC or any OEM for the failure of any device to be on a specific carrier Blame the carrier!!!
  4. palandri's Avatar
    Retired Moderator

    Posts
    7,589 Posts
    Global Posts
    9,915 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #4  
    Won't happen. U.S. carriers want you locked into a contract with their phone.

    Although 80% on the world uses GSM, in Asia where a few carriers use CDMA, they have a CDMA SIM type card so you can switch carriers. You'll never see those in the U.S.

    I read a lot of articles about Nokia getting back into U.S. marketplace. One of the conditions I kept reading about was Nokia had to stop selling unlocked, unbranded, pentaband (works on AT&T, T-Mobile and Europe GSM) phones in the U.S. Nokia did have a few stores in U.S. We had one in Chicago, but they have all been closed.
  5. anodynamic's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    150 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #5  
    Quote Originally Posted by jfa1 View Post
    Any company like Nokia can make phones for Verison or Sprint or ATT or Mo or whoever. Theyw ont unless the carrier is willing to pony up the support and make a financial commitment.
    I get the impression it's the other way around. The carriers rule the US phone market, and the manufactures have to play along if they want any share of that market. Competing by offering exclusive handsets is a good system from their perspective, since that isn't what they actually make money from, and without it they would have to compete with the service fees only.
  6. kylej1050's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    147 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #6  
    You won't likely see an unbranded CDMA phone here. I'm not sure about verizon but sprint doesn't care what the phone is, if it didn't have a sprint logo on it when it came out of the factory, they won't activate.

    Now someone like cricket might, since they will even re-flash another carrier's phone for you to use on their system.
  7. selfcreation's Avatar
    Retired Moderator

    Posts
    3,288 Posts
    Global Posts
    3,304 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #7  
    CDMA phones CANNOT be unlock for other carriers any ways.

    they have to specifically make the phone for one carrier.
  8. Polychrome's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    338 Posts
    Global Posts
    791 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #8  
    Quote Originally Posted by palandri View Post
    Won't happen. U.S. carriers want you locked into a contract with their phone.

    Although 80% on the world uses GSM, in Asia where a few carriers use CDMA, they have a CDMA SIM type card so you can switch carriers. You'll never see those in the U.S.
    4G Verizon phones use a sim that handles provisioning for CDMA, GSM (for roaming), and LTE, however I'm not completely sure whether or not manufactureres might attempt to make an "unlocked" phone for these. It's technically possible.

    The problem with the CDMA carriers is compatibility. There's nothing on CDMA phones that is "locked", however the carriers won't necessarily allow a device to be used on their network if they aren't completely, absolutely sure that the device will work properly. There are some devices out there that can be activated on any CDMA carrier without a fuss, but they're mostly non-voice devices like unbranded data cards and the like.
  9. speedtouch's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    1,043 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,150 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #9  
    Quote Originally Posted by anodynamic View Post
    I get the impression it's the other way around. The carriers rule the US phone market, and the manufactures have to play along if they want any share of that market. Competing by offering exclusive handsets is a good system from their perspective, since that isn't what they actually make money from, and without it they would have to compete with the service fees only.
    You would be 100% correct.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions