Biometrics FTW

These are all the laptops that support Windows Hello

Can you handle the truth?

What Apple's latest iPad ads say about Microsoft and Windows

Drop it like it's hot

Panasonic's Toughbook CF-33 is a ridiculously rugged 2-in-1

Saving money on data

Mint SIM is the perfect way to get cheap data in the U.S.

Forecast is cloudy

Windows 10 Cloud will run Win32 apps, but only from the Windows Store

Excessive in a good way

GTX 1050 in a 15-inch convertible? Lenovo went there

Windows goes galactic

Revealed: Samsung's Surface Pro-like Galaxy Book, running Windows 10

We made some changes

Our new forums are here!

Don't count Windows Phone out just yet

Dead? Psh. Here are 5 reasons to stick with Windows 10 Mobile

VPN vs. Proxy

The difference between a proxy and a VPN

Latitude attitude

Dell Latitude 7280 is a business laptop with tons of consumer attitude

4K all the way

You probably don't NEED a 4K webcam, but we love Logitech's BRIO 4K anyway

Long live Windows phone

Contrary to popular belief, Windows phone won't die anytime soon

XP-YESSSSSSS

Dell's already awesome XPS 15 gets even better in 2017

Surface Pwn 5

Surface Pro 5, Project NEON details leaked on LinkedIn?

Redefining the PC

Why Microsoft's Surface phone could be MUCH more than a mere 'phone'

Surface table meets Windows 10

Yes, we did put Windows 10 on the original Surface table ... and it rocks

Cream o' the crop

Before buying a Microsoft laptop, check out our pick for the absolute best

Simple and secure, just the way I like it

We think Windows 10 Cloud is a great idea, here's why

uber micro

Halo Wars 2 has something for everyone. Here's our full review.

< >
Welcome to the Windows Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. geekmaster's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    139 Posts
    Global Posts
    154 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
       #1  
    Why has almost no one yet mentioned the idea of putting x86 chips on a windows phone? a version of the intel atom (1.6GHz Intel Atom Z2460 CPU) is powering the gingebread android phone named orange sandiego.

    here are some benchmark comparisons from the verge


    "more corez" is not always everything :lol: the 1.6GHz Intel Atom Z2460 CPU would be a perfect choice for wp8 if microsoft took time to optimize it to the fullest so oems can put it in their future phones.

    Now for the hardcore gamers out there this might be the future of mobile gaming for windows phone look no further than the next generation of AMD's E series cpu's. The video bellow compares the chip in the orange sandiego (1.6GHz Intel Atom Z2460 CPU) to their new E series line expected later this year.
    [YT]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6XixkwEUhM[/YT]

    So do you think x86 is the next big step for windows phone? i would like to hear from you
  2. index1366's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    271 Posts
    Global Posts
    288 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #2  
    In my opinion, that would be like you would have literally a mini computer in your pocket/hand. Think about the possibilities with that hardware. My thoughts are that multiple cores can be "replaced" by higher frequencies, but in some situations an extra core would be good (HD video shooting/playing, programs, games..)

    But there is also the problem about battery life and gaming. Some games could be pretty graphical intense, and that could chew it up quickly.

    Btw, the same processor is found in the Lava XOLO X900 Android phone.
  3. Siah1214's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    189 Posts
    Global Posts
    388 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #3  
    Because everyone wants an oversized phone being cooled by a fan. Intel has a lot of work to do before I get an x86 phone.
  4. pjs37's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    449 Posts
    Global Posts
    780 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #4  
    I don't even want to think of the hit on battery life it would take...
  5. eric12341's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    2,635 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,641 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #5  
    There's a reason why ARM was conceived for mobile devices to begin with.
  6. geekmaster's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    139 Posts
    Global Posts
    154 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
       #6  
    Quote Originally Posted by eric12341 View Post
    There's a reason why ARM was conceived for mobile devices to begin with.
    Well i believe things soon might change
    [YT]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un-lzczdGnM[/YT]
  7. sting7k's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    292 Posts
    Global Posts
    3,915 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #7  
    Quote Originally Posted by geekmaster View Post
    Why has almost no one yet mentioned the idea of putting x86 chips on a windows phone? a version of the intel atom (1.6GHz Intel Atom Z2460 CPU) is powering the gingebread android phone named orange sandiego.

    here are some benchmark comparisons from the verge
    Click to view quoted image


    "more corez" is not always everything :lol: the 1.6GHz Intel Atom Z2460 CPU would be a perfect choice for wp8 if microsoft took time to optimize it to the fullest so oems can put it in their future phones.

    Now for the hardcore gamers out there this might be the future of mobile gaming for windows phone look no further than the next generation of AMD's E series cpu's. The video bellow compares the chip in the orange sandiego (1.6GHz Intel Atom Z2460 CPU) to their new E series line expected later this year.


    So do you think x86 is the next big step for windows phone? i would like to hear from you
    They put out too much heat. They are too big. They use too much power. Completely unneeded. These phones already are pocket computers.
  8. palandri's Avatar
    Retired Moderator

    Posts
    7,589 Posts
    Global Posts
    9,915 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #8  
    My HTPC, which I use as my DVR is a Giada A50-BA531 with an AMD Fusion E350 1.6G APU Dual Core and an ATI Radeon 6310 video chipset. It's pretty powerful. Even when I am recording a show and watching a recorded show at the same time, it never goes much above about 55% CPU usage.
  9. bruceleer0y's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    22 Posts
    Global Posts
    121 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #9  
    I want to understand what everyone's talking about, but I can't and my head hurts!

    :Nevermind I understand now

    I personally prefer gaming on my pc. It feels more comfortable, but if they find a way to make this work it would be exciting.
  10. rbrunner's Avatar
    Developer

    Posts
    112 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #10  
    Quote Originally Posted by geekmaster View Post
    So do you think x86 is the next big step for windows phone?
    Why should a little more power result in a big step? After all, Intel's smartphone CPUs are not twice as fast as their ARM competition, not even 50% faster. For graphic-intensive games sometimes favored by those "hardcore gamers" it's the GPU anyway which defines what's possible.

    On the power-consumption front, after a long time and much, much effort on Intel's side those CPUs are finally suitable for smartphones. But hey, a big step would be something with half the power consumption.

    I think anyway that for 95% percent of those smartphone users who do not happen to be hardcore gamers a longer battery life with still decent performance would be more interesting than still more raw power.
  11. Reflexx's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    4,483 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    #11  
    I don't think it will be practical for the phone form factor. Too much heat and it will drain battery. ARM processors can pretty much shut off when not in use. x86 CPUs can't do that.

    While there will surely be advances for x86, there will also be advances in ARM as well.

    The battlefront will be in larger mobile devices, where we can have huge batteries and the need for full scale productivity and power may be in more demand than battery life.

    I'd actually like to see a tri-core x86 processor, where one core is reserved just for running the OS itself, and background functions. Maybe have that particular core just be in the 166Mhz range, with very low power consumption. The other two cores would only be used when needed. They could be the typical 1Ghz.

Posting Permissions

";