Welcome to the Windows Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. lfjj's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    288 Posts
    Global Posts
    293 Global Posts
       #1  
    I always switch to 2G (data off) when I am not doing anything with the phone. Does 2G drain less battery than 3G in standby/idle?
    Device: Nokia Lumia 920 (Black)
    Firmware: 8.0.10517.150
    Network: Tele2 Sweden

    500px:
    @LostMySelf
    Instagram:
    @lightness90
  2. JammyGitz's Avatar
    Banned

    Posts
    198 Posts
    #2  
    Yes 2G is better for battery because I think it runs on a lower frequency
  3. Philippe Maes's Avatar
    Member

    Posts
    56 Posts
    Global Posts
    57 Global Posts
    #3  
    The difference is very noticable when you have very bad 3G reception (1 bar). My phone would drain 8%/hour when idle, so I always switch to 2G then.
  4. #4  
    Yea unless you have poor 3G/4G reception where you'll be leaving the phone idle it's best to switch to 2G otherwise no difference. In fact in areas where 2G reception is even with 3G/4G reception then battery consumption with data usage on 2G would be greater because the modem is working harder to transmit data.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-10-2013, 05:25 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-06-2013, 01:33 PM
  3. Change from 3G to 2G (or whatever) causes no signal
    By lfjj in forum Windows Phone 8
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-02-2013, 01:43 AM
  4. Better Battery Life on LTE than 3G
    By ut_jd in forum HTC 8X
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-26-2012, 11:05 AM
  5. Battery life on 3G vs Edge ( 2G )
    By JK0d3r in forum Nokia Lumia 800
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-09-2012, 09:05 PM

Posting Permissions