06-15-2013, 10:05 AM #3
- 1,145 Posts
And then fragments the user base and torpedoes MS intentions for the future and Kinect's place in that future. It won't happen. I think there is a greater chance of MS dropping the disc drive then the Kinect.
06-15-2013, 11:19 AM #7
- 9 Posts
Sorry guys but forcing the xb1 to come with Kinect will finally get developers to make good use of it other than weak games as on xb360s version. You separate the Kinect then you end up with crap games again.
You may not like Kinect but there are many households that make good use of it. I would love to see an avengers battle for earth 2 that uses the next Kinect. I bet the experience would be much better.
And please don't start with the loons and Kinect being a spying device. People post their lives on Facebook everyday which reveals a ton more than the Kinect.
Now. With that being said they really need to get close to the PS4 pricing to compete. Especially with the new restrictions.
My 2 pennies. No trolling please.
- 06-15-2013, 11:20 AM #8
- 06-15-2013, 11:29 AM #9
I would honestly rather be able to have it proven to me (and not from an on-stage presentation, but through personal experience) that this new Kinect is going to solve the input lag problems. I think it would be preferable to have a $400 model without the Kinect for that reason, some simply do not trust the Kinect yet. I would be willing to do as they did the first time, have a bundle without the Kinect, then make the standalone product $150. If it proved itself capable, I'd pay the extra $50 at a later time, but only if the technology is proven to be orders of magnitude better than before, as they claim it to be.
I'd be extremely frustrated and disappointed if I was required to shell out an extra $100 for something I am tentative on like this if I want my console, only to find out it still isn't viable for gaming because of the same problems as before. I mean, it's one thing to annoy people with this required bundling, but how bad will it be if a bunch of people are pissed off because the thing can't do what they expect it to when they bought it? I know I'd be disgusted if I learned I was being required to tack on the purchase of something that doesn't even work for me.
Now, that's not to say it WILL happen, or I EXPECT it to happen. I simply hope that if Microsoft is going to go this route, then this Kinect is top-notch and without flaws, because forcing it on those who want the console when it's sub-par is going to go over very badly.
- 06-15-2013, 12:28 PM #13
06-15-2013, 01:36 PM #14
- 28 Posts
Game developers aside, I do think this next generation of Kinect hardware is much improved.
06-15-2013, 03:43 PM #15
- 995 Posts
Selling it stand alone, would lead to the hardware costing more (because you'd sell less of them), you'd have to factor in R&D, profit for Microsoft, and at least 50% markup for the retailer.
Bundle Kinect with the console, and instantly its much cheaper, because you remove the markup, because there is already a markup of the console. Microsoft make little or no money on console sales, and lump the R&D costs in with the console. Therefore you end up with Kinect only really costing Microsoft the cost of the hardware
- 06-15-2013, 06:04 PM #16
How is the new Kinect implemented in new battlfied4,
How about killer instinct,
How a bout NBA 14,
How about the new halo,
No need for Kinect these were new realeses new Xbox one releases and none of theses games not one uses Kinect so why do I need one.... I don't , dice knew us battlefield players wont need the Kinect so no implementation same for cod ,killer instinct a so on
So my question to all is if they sold the Kinect separately would they sell? I say not well
- 06-15-2013, 07:27 PM #20
- 06-15-2013, 08:03 PM #21
If I tried to get family on their X1 from my phone and each one of them had their X1 disconnected I think that would make one real rubbish system.
It is frustrating when you try ring someone and their phone is switched off or they have no signal, I think everyone has been frustrated from that at one time.
Your example of phone operators making you answer your phone is a terrible comparison. I am sure a lot of Windows Phone Central posters would agree.
- 06-15-2013, 08:26 PM #22
As I said, both are basically missed phone calls. However, if you want a more-direct comparison, what happens if you try to Skype someone on the PC or a smartphone and the person doesn't respond? I imagine that's EXACTLY how the Xbox would react, and is that some egregious problem now? Or DOES it force a reply to call on Skype (never used it, so I don't know). I'm just wondering:
1. How is it different (Skype from phone and Xbox Skype from non-Xbox Skype)?
2. What's wrong with the suggestion I made of a voice-only connection (if the person has a mic)?
- 06-15-2013, 08:36 PM #23
So having all X1s not needing their kinects plugged in wouldn't make the Skype experience worse?
Its obvious it would make it poor if 60% didn't even have theirs connected.
If every single PC and every single phone had Skype and every console had it to that would make a superb communication tool. At the moment that scenario doesn't exist but one day it might and the X1 is the very start. Every tv may have Skype one day.
What's the problem with Microsoft trying to reach that goal.
- 06-15-2013, 09:15 PM #24
More-importantly, I shouldn't have to plug in my Kinect that I don't intend to use because you want to use Skype any more than you should have to unplug your Kinect because I don't want to use Skype.
My suggestion is to allow for choice based on preferences. Your suggestion is to force everyone into what you like and want.
06-15-2013, 10:03 PM #25
- 5 Posts
I think having the Kinect bundled was actually a smart move. Now that everyone has a Kinect it can become a priority feature and developers will add Kinect support in games, and more games will be developed because EVERYONE with an X1 will have one. The Xbox 360 Kinect failed because everybody did not have one. So when shopping for a game, gamers would just skip over the Kinect games on the shelf. Now even if you don't want a Kinect game people would actually look through them and may find something they like.
Also playing the Kinect will be better on the X1 because the system was built for it. I own the original Kinect and I rarely use it. Now that it isn't a choice I will use it more and ma like it all over again. Also (even though I prefer a turtlebeaches) gamers playing games like COD would have no excuse not to talk, especially in league play when talking is almost required. Now every gamer would have access to a mic from day one and it will have to be plugged in to operate the X1. And the mic will be way better than the 360 kinect's mic.
In my opinion I think people should stop complaining about the price, and how they don't want a Kinect when they never gave it a shot or even seen what it can do. Obviously being integrated in the system and not just an add on will make it a ton better than the original.
- By Muessig in forum Xbox Console GamingReplies: 432Last Post: 11-29-2013, 09:46 AM
- By Robert Carpenter in forum Xbox Console GamingReplies: 10Last Post: 06-11-2013, 04:04 PM
- By smoledman in forum Xbox Console GamingReplies: 17Last Post: 06-10-2013, 08:46 AM
- By GraemeT in forum Windows Phone AppsReplies: 2Last Post: 05-17-2013, 06:41 PM
- By socialcarpet in forum Windows Phone 7Replies: 2Last Post: 04-04-2012, 06:23 PM