Yes I want the XBox One to win because to me it represents innovation, while the PS4 represents stagnation and pandering.
Pandering? If you want to say that Sony panders to people who don't want to go all-digital, all the time, you could easily say that Microsoft is using its check-in to pander to companies who want to mess with the used game market to benefit them. Every product and service panders, they just pander to different crowds.
Also, to say that everything Microsoft does is innovation, and all Sony does is stagnation is to completely ignore the facts. Sony is appealing to a wider range of people because of its policies and pricing. They don't need to innovate as greatly because of the fact that they have some things that Microsoft lacked this generation, and next, in some cases. Just a few examples:
1. Sony gives away free games to PSN+ subscribers, and has for some time. Microsoft is starting that on the 360 from July on, until the end of 2013. Sony will keep this going on the PS4.
2. Sony allows for self-replaced storage, something Microsoft has never offered.
3. Sony plans to use GaiKai to offer backwards-compatible gaming through that streaming service.
4. Sony has a the better overall computing power this generation, and will again next generation, from a single-device standpoint (I know that the Azure servers change that up with the Xbox One).
Not everything Microsoft does is innovation. Not everything Sony does is stagnation. Even when what you say IS true, it does not mean that the innovation or stagnation is for the better or worse, respectively. Sony might be keeping its swappable hard drive feature from one console to the next, but that's because that stagnation is GOOD.