New Facebook App for WP8! Finally!!

Florin Anghel

Banned
Jan 9, 2013
102
0
0
Visit site
I don't like the design at all, it looks so boring, the blue top bar is ugly! Their old design was nice, I loved it, at least they could have shrink the top bar from the old design instead of implementing this one. No modern UI design, I won't comment on fluidity because I don't see one, in comparison with the people hub this works kinda slow.
It's good that they work on fb app, but unfortunately on the design part it is in the wrong direction.
What I noticed in my short experience with the beta app is that:
-at first no news feed, had to go to settings of news feed to show what is recent, doesn't know top stories.
-at chat, when you go on the typing area, the pulling of the screen upwards is laggy
-pictures load in more than 2 seconds (and trust me I have a good connection).
-when you look at a picture in landscape mode it will show on the side of the screen a part of "favorites people"

Pretty much that's it, I uninstalled it, my principle is that I don't use apps that I don't like how they look :D
Anyway, before this beta I wasn't even using fb app, the people hub is enough for me.
 

ah06

New member
Dec 15, 2012
89
0
0
Visit site
And I'll also post here to disagree. Of course it is not about the banner image. It is about functionality and good design; you seem to be mistaking consistency for intuitiveness. A metro-style WP app could be every bit as intuitive and easy to use without mimicking the iOS and Android app designs. If apps look the same across platforms then WP gives up an opportunity to differentiate itself through UI design.

I think it is more important to have consistency within an OS (and across apps within that OS) than it is have a single app look the same across different operating systems. Is a WP user more likely to use multiple apps on his/her phone, or to use the same app across WP and iOS/Android?

I posted a pretty detailed reply here:

http://forums.windowscentral.com/windows-phone-8/225163-2.htm#post1963785

To be very specific over here: Differentiation is only good when its demonstrably and perceivably better. Differentiation is a weakness if its worse or even equal.
Consistency and intuitiveness are very much linked especially considering that the UI conventions in the new app aren't just a copy of another platform, it is FB's own UI which it uses on its own web platform agnostic properties. This isn't Android/iOS invading WP. It's FB on WP with FB's own conventions in an FB app.

As I explained at length in the linked post, Metro has its strengths and weakness and it fails completely with complex UI and content heavy apps that cannot easily be segmented into panorama/pivot buckets. You are not going to see a Metro Photoshop, FB, Word or Excel with Panoramas and Pivots anytime soon. This is inherent to Metro. It simplifies, spaces out and uses background imagery to provide vibrance.

I have also elaborated on why most apps SHOULD conform to OS design whereas certain super/killer apps *shouldn't*. Any app that is the centerpiece of a users experience or is core to their life or in general is more important to the user than the OS itself and with which a user might have extensive prior experience on other platforms or the web should forge its own path (this could vary from user to user but apps like FB, Whatsapp, Skype, Word etc can typically fall into this category)

Bottom line: These apps are more important than OS. Consumers buy phones to get to these apps and to be able to accomplish tasks with them. They typically don't make choices on OS without thinking about whether it will work with their apps and services.

Check out the Music player example for where I think Metro gets it exactly right despite being not as "good" in strict UI terms. (Metro music player looks better than Android/iOS and functions just as well despite not having its controls as clearly distinct as other platforms). The post also details why this new FB Beta app is Metro done just right as opposed to being differentiation for sake of differentiation. Metro is woven into the new FB app right into the details. The squared edges, the lack of faux 3D, lack of drop shadows, consistency with system fonts etc. This is Metro, understated. As opposed to twisting and shoehorning FB's established conventions and puking Metro all over it
 

sandmanfvr

New member
Jun 15, 2011
129
0
0
Visit site
Can you quit argueing about the design? You have other threads for that...

Now I am missing notifications. Damn toast being flaky.
 

fredolay69

New member
Mar 28, 2013
33
0
0
Visit site
this app is so frikin fast, sleek, and awesome. I'm so happy right now. Windows Phone rulez!

I second that!!!! This new facebook has me all smiles!!! Fast, smooth, and everything i need. I actualy look foward to checking facebook in an app now, instead of going to the mobile website on my phone. WP8 for L1f3!!
 

zokstar

New member
Nov 21, 2012
178
0
0
Visit site
So far im really liking it! Havent en-counted any bugs so far.

Who cares if it looks the same as the other OS's, just makes it easier for other users to use if switching over. As long as it does everything we want it to, bring it on!!!
 

TonyDedrick

New member
Dec 8, 2011
671
0
0
Visit site
And I'll also post here to disagree. Of course it is not about the banner image. It is about functionality and good design; you seem to be mistaking consistency for intuitiveness. A metro-style WP app could be every bit as intuitive and easy to use without mimicking the iOS and Android app designs. If apps look the same across platforms then WP gives up an opportunity to differentiate itself through UI design.

I think it is more important to have consistency within an OS (and across apps within that OS) than it is have a single app look the same across different operating systems. Is a WP user more likely to use multiple apps on his/her phone, or to use the same app across WP and iOS/Android?

If the app works, who cares how it looks.
 

lumia8

New member
Feb 1, 2013
9
0
0
Visit site
I like it so far, in general. Looks much better than the previous one. But I noticed that when you have a long post/message in inbox or news feed, unlike the older version pressing "See more" or "Continue reading" will direct you to the browser instead. Hope the release version will fix this.
 

Jaripi

New member
Nov 16, 2012
802
0
0
Visit site
It is very nice one, but ...

1. Can not save photos to phone

2. Can not send a photo through chatting (Facebook Messenger can do that)

3. Missing refresh by push up in a message (do not suggest me to shake my cp)
 

nessinhaw

New member
Mar 16, 2013
367
0
0
Visit site
I like it so far, in general. Looks much better than the previous one. But I noticed that when you have a long post/message in inbox or news feed, unlike the older version pressing "See more" or "Continue reading" will direct you to the browser instead. Hope the release version will fix this.

it's not redirecting me o_O when i hit "see more" it continues inside the app! you should report this to MS, prolly a bug! just go to settings - about - feedback :D

edit: just shared my 1st post, soooo happy ;-; i missed sharing a lot, this is great <3
 
Last edited:

Tomanband

New member
Mar 8, 2013
169
0
0
Visit site
YES!!!! To bad I can not download the Beta app in England.

Anyone know when this app will be released?

I followed the link on the windows phone blog on my PC and clicked on "install". This contacts your phone and installs it automatically. (I am also outside of the USA)
 

DavidinCT

Active member
Feb 18, 2011
3,310
0
36
Visit site
I tried this, is it me but, isn't this just the facebook touch mobile site in a app ? Personally, I am leaning towards the old one that I like better...metro interface not just a web site in a app.
 

ttsoldier

Retired Ambassador
Dec 4, 2012
4,351
0
0
Visit site
It is very nice one, but ...

1. Can not save photos to phone

2. Can not send a photo through chatting (Facebook Messenger can do that)

3. Missing refresh by push up in a message (do not suggest me to shake my cp)

Send your feedback to Microsoft. This is why it's a beta.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
323,197
Messages
2,243,433
Members
428,035
Latest member
jacobss