Is VR already becoming an after thought?

rodneyej

New member
Nov 21, 2011
119
0
0
Visit site
Is AR/VR already becoming an after thought in the tech world, and for consumers? Is it too soon? Did AR/VR not pan out to be the industry shifting new technology that we thought it would be?..... Thoughts?
 

Joe920

Active member
Nov 13, 2012
1,677
0
36
Visit site
Is AR/VR already becoming an after thought in the tech world, and for consumers? Is it too soon? Did AR/VR not pan out to be the industry shifting new technology that we thought it would be?..... Thoughts?
The good news is that a new WMR headset was just released, so the manufacturers still believe in it somewhat. For me personally, having just bought a headset I love it, so there's one consumer who bought into it.

I think FPS games are (relatively) easily ported to VR, for example Fallout 4, so I think those will keep coming to VR and they will keep racking up some sales. I hope it remains worth the effort for the developers, because so far I love it. Enough to be on the lookout for a better eGPU already.
 
Last edited:

mythos13

New member
Apr 9, 2011
41
0
0
Visit site
Is AR/VR already becoming an after thought in the tech world, and for consumers? Is it too soon? Did AR/VR not pan out to be the industry shifting new technology that we thought it would be?..... Thoughts?

No, it is a certainty that it will grow year over year for many years to come though I believe the growth will remain small for a couplre more years yet. But it does continue to grow. The percentage of Steam users that have a VR headset keeps rising slowly but surely. I think we will hit 1% of Steam users within the year!

But the biggest way you can tell is by the massive amount being spent on hardware and software developent right now--games are not seeing the big bucks yet but that will come. But so many are betting big on AR and VR right now.

The big 3 holding it back is complexity, visual quality and the cost. We are making good strides on them all but all need to improve and espeically the cost.
 

Joe920

Active member
Nov 13, 2012
1,677
0
36
Visit site
The big 3 holding it back is complexity, visual quality and the cost. We are making good strides on them all but all need to improve and espeically the cost.
I hope you're right that it'll keep growing. As for costs, again just one data point, but I was able to buy a GTX1050 eGPU for $280, which is rather weak for VR but enough for Skyrim VR which is fantastic. I tried it out on a $250 Lenovo Explorer (controllers included), which was exciting enough that I decided to buy into it. I returned the Explorer (small focus spot, LCD) and spent $400 on a Samsung HMD Odyssey. So for "only" $680 I've been having a blast in the past few weeks.

I'm planning on getting a better GPU solution so I can enjoy Elite Dangerous, and when (not if) No Man's Sky VR comes out I plan on jumping on that asap. Haven't gamed in decades, but thanks to VR I'm back. "Just when I thought I was out.." :)
 

L0n3N1nja

New member
Dec 22, 2016
184
0
0
Visit site
I think the hype has died down some because it's no longer new and exciting tech, but I don't think its gonna go away.

Personally I want to get more into VR, but it's a bit expensive and I've got more important things than to spend hundreds on a new toy. I don't have the PS4, and my PC isn't powerful enough, so it makes it a bit spendy.
 

Joe920

Active member
Nov 13, 2012
1,677
0
36
Visit site
Personally I want to get more into VR, but it's a bit expensive and I've got more important things than to spend hundreds on a new toy. I don't have the PS4, and my PC isn't powerful enough, so it makes it a bit spendy.
Makes total sense. If you have TB3 and a decent CPU you could do what I did and find an affordable eGPU. The headsets themselves have been getting some deep discounts lately. Still, it does end up being at least ~$600 total for only moderate performance. Lower prices are definitely needed!
 

kurotsuki

New member
Sep 3, 2012
26
0
0
Visit site
Still, it does end up being at least ~$600 total for only moderate performance. Lower prices are definitely needed!
This... My friend... Is still hundreds to spend like what Lone Ninja said, which is, sadly, he (and I and many other people) can't afford to spend for a toybox. Am I a gamer? Yes. Am I playing games on PC? Yes (well... Laptop IS a PC). But my PC is only strong enough to play games like Aragami (and any other similar spec'ed games). And as a family man, I can't afford to buy stronger stuff unless it is for work (making money instead of losing money).
 

Scienceguy Labs

Active member
Jun 13, 2012
3,573
1
38
Visit site
I have the Lenovo MR headset. During the first few weeks of owning it, I was really into it, but it's been almost three months since I've last used it. It's an incredible piece of technology. I just don't have a practical user for it yet.
 

Joe920

Active member
Nov 13, 2012
1,677
0
36
Visit site
I have the Lenovo MR headset. During the first few weeks of owning it, I was really into it, but it's been almost three months since I've last used it. It's an incredible piece of technology. I just don't have a practical user for it yet.
That's too bad. Would you mind sharing what games or other apps you tried?

For me it was first Google Earth which was unexpectedly amazing, but tbh I haven't been back to that in two weeks. And then Skyrim, which I liked enough to figure out some basic modding. Skyrim is so huge though that I'm still really into it. After that I intend to get some better graphics and try out Elite Dangerous and Fallout 4, both of which are huge 3D worlds, and as I mentioned I'm already looking forward getting into No Man's Sky once they release a VR version. To me the experience of 'being there' is so cool that I keep coming back for more, at least right now. We'll see how it goes I guess!

But yeah, I get that for most people throwing another $500-$1000 at a toy will be over the top. On a positive note: thanks to the cryptomining craze people should be able to find some affordable graphics cards on eBay in the coming year. :)
 

Scienceguy Labs

Active member
Jun 13, 2012
3,573
1
38
Visit site
That's too bad. Would you mind sharing what games or other apps you tried?

For me it was first Google Earth which was unexpectedly amazing, but tbh I haven't been back to that in two weeks. And then Skyrim, which I liked enough to figure out some basic modding. Skyrim is so huge though that I'm still really into it. After that I intend to get some better graphics and try out Elite Dangerous and Fallout 4, both of which are huge 3D worlds, and as I mentioned I'm already looking forward getting into No Man's Sky once they release a VR version. To me the experience of 'being there' is so cool that I keep coming back for more, at least right now. We'll see how it goes I guess!

But yeah, I get that for most people throwing another $500-$1000 at a toy will be over the top. On a positive note: thanks to the cryptomining craze people should be able to find some affordable graphics cards on eBay in the coming year. :)
Definitely love cruising around in Google Earth. That's still quite fun.
I've really only played a couple of games on it, both from the Microsoft app store. One, if I remember correctly, takes place in a laboratory. I can't remember the name, but it's pretty fun. The other was some game where you stopped light pollution by breaking street lights around you. Don't remember the name, but it was a beautiful game. As you can see, my gaming time with the headset is pretty low.
I do play some games on Steam every Friday night with some friends, but I'm not what I'd consider to be a heavy gamer. When I bought my headset, I didn't plan to use it primarily as a gaming device. I wanted to use it more as an educational or exploratory tool. I don't really know how to describe it. Anyway, I'm all for Microsoft investing in the tech. It's really cool, and it will only improve with time. For me, personally, I just haven't found a proper use for it yet.
 

Kimmo Toivanen

New member
Jan 12, 2013
182
0
0
Visit site
Oasis - waiting for you ;)
Also 360 work environment with enough many screens for everything, good performance on reasonably priced hardware (XBOXONE-like) and facial expression sensors for truer avatar-to-avatar chat are yet to realize :winktongue:
 

Joe920

Active member
Nov 13, 2012
1,677
0
36
Visit site
One more on the cost issue, for those here lucky enough to own a Surface Book 2 with dGPU you already have enough graphics power to enjoy basic VR, so could get the Lenovo Explorer with controllers on Amazon right now brand new for $200 and see if you like it. That's a reasonably low barrier to entry right?

On the topic of this thread though: I just went to the Windows App Store and first of all, if you go to Games > Browse All Games and look through the categories, there's no VR or MR! So bad.. You can then click 'More filters', and then in 'Capabilities' (oohh catchy!) you can find Windows Mixed Reality. Turns out there's only 39 items. Ouch. So as to the title of this thread, it seems like it's an afterthought for Microsoft.

For comparison, if you go on Steam and click the Games drop down menu, the fourth item is Virtual Reality. Better! I don't see a total game count, but looking at the VR section "what's being experienced" there's over 900 games, a good fraction of which are compatible with WMR. Long story short, probably best to ignore the MS store for VR games.
 

Bloobed

New member
Oct 13, 2012
47
0
0
Visit site
Everyone who has tried my PSVR has been very impressed and some have gotten the headset themselves, some are still considering and others do not even own a PS4 (Pro) so are not certain they would end up using it all that much. The store is getting more and more experiences everyday, and some AAA developers are tipping their toes in the waters as well. Honestly, I expect PS5 and PSVR2 to make a decent splash.
 

anon(5415472)

New member
Nov 27, 2012
226
0
0
Visit site
IMG_20180813_150143.jpg

I didn't really like windows MR in my first week of trying it out. First couple of minutes with it and I got the migraine from hell. It didn't really get better with each session in the week after that. I invested on the gtx 1060 laptop and the lenovo headset and patiently waited for the months it took for them to arrive separately so I'll be damned if I'll give up on it. After the second week it got a little better. On the third week it was ok. I don't think MR/AR/VR will become an afterthought. It just needs a little more progress to make it better and more comfortable to use. As well as a whole lot of marketing.
 

cool8man

New member
Mar 19, 2011
46
0
0
Visit site
We are in the Apple Newton, Palm Pilot era of this technology. It amazes me how people interested in technology don't understand the long arc it requires for technology to become mainstream. It's like they bought into this Jobs ****** mindset that something gets invented and then a year later it's either here to stay or a dead end of technology. I see this said about Wii and Kinect too. I've seen many people dismiss motion tracking as fads while failing to see the bigger picture and how these technologies continue to get refined and implemented into more devices and use cases. AR is far too useful to ever be dismissed as a dead end, but the tech isn't there today for it to be mainstream. The cost, design and field of view hold AR back from being the next smartphone, PC today. I have no problem being an early adopter at a reasonable cost. $2K-$3K is unreasonable for what they're offering. Microsoft is great at innovating and introducing new technologies, but awful at supporting, promoting and successfully popularizing a new technology. It will require either a consumer electronics brand or a startup company fully invested to bring these technologies to the mainstream.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
322,908
Messages
2,242,875
Members
428,004
Latest member
hetb