@Winterfang's "Why are you defending this"
^^ because what they did was a marketing error. They demonstrated technology not the device.
They said this is OIS, they did not say this is Nokia Lumia 920.
It is a lie, I'm sorry.
But having said that, I know the atmosphere behind those doors where Nokia, MS, the ad agency and the production house all wrangled and tangled up to make a ad about the new device to be launched any time soon.
It WAS supposed to sell like hot cake, it was supposed to be their (only?) USP. People were to say "WHOA!! Look what a Lumia can do."...but because of one tiny screw up...it all comes down like a house if cards.
But on the other hand, if this little mistake wasn't caught, how many of us would actually believe OIS was capable of doing this??
Sent from my DROID RaZr.
I would had believe it. The 808 Pureview is a fantastic camera and I have no doubts Nokia could do something like that for Windows Phone.
But they tried to play us for suckers and it turn down on then catastrophically. ( It's even on the news)
If they don't believe in their camera why should I? Didn't the One X commercial with the guy taking pictures while free falling from an Airplane real? Yet Nokia can't even take night pictures without faking it!!
Why are you defending this?
It is a lie, I'm sorry.
But having said that, I know the atmosphere behind those doors where Nokia, MS, the ad agency and the production house all wrangled and tangled up to make an ad about the new device to be launched any time soon.
It WAS supposed to sell like hot cake, it was supposed to be their (only?) USP. People were to say "WHOA!! Look what a Lumia can do."...but because of one tiny screw up...it all comes down like a house of cards.
But on the other hand, if this little mistake wasn't caught, how many of us would actually believe OIS was capable of doing this??
Sent from my DROID RaZr.
At least Sire/S Voice are real and they didn't used a professional tape recorder or something. Surely you would understand how advertising a cellphone camera using instead a professional camera and set up is straight up lying.
It will be like me uploading a painting in Facebook, then had people call me out for taking a picture of a museum and trying to pass it out as something I made.
I truly do understand where Mitlov and Xenophos are coming from. It was a huge error. And it's quote possible that someone in a high decision making position knew that it could be misleading, but took the risk anyway just because it is standard practice. So, it makes sense to actually wait and see real results and reviews from the device before believing things.
But honestly, Winterfang's rants come across as hating. The declarations that the device doesn't work, even though evidence from respected tech journalists say it does, seems more like a mission against Nokia than an honest analysis.