Lumia 1330

[imnotevenhererightnow]

Haven't seen much discussion of it (maybe a bit last month), but starting to read about rumors of a new 5.7" Lumia with a 14MP PureView camera. Terribly disappointing to hear that it's going to be yet another phone to use the SD400. I would have hoped to see the SD 615. Other than that, it looks promising.

Thoughts?

 

[several potatos]

It's a budget phablet. SD 400 should be fine.

 

[mathsisbest]

SD 400 is fine for Windows phone OS. The Lumia 830 uses the same processor and is not laggy.

 

[imnotevenhererightnow]

you think so, even with the extra MPs on the camera?

 

[several potatos]

If an S4 was fine with 41mp, the 400 can handle 16

 

[mathsisbest]

you think so, even with the extra MPs on the camera?

Lumia 830 has around 10mp. Not too much difference. I'd like a SD 615 etc, but IMO the SD 400 is fine

 

[Joshwin]

You don't need to worry too much about the processor on lumia 1330 as of now, because you have much more worrying feature than this. the real disappointing fact about lumia 1330 is that it has been rumored to have ONLY 2500mAh battery which is awfully lower than 1320's massive 3400mAh.So battery life will be the real problem on lumia 1330 considering its beefed up specs and camera. and the battery is non-removable.So in my opinion they shouldn't reduce the battery from 3400mAh to 2500mAh.Higher battery was one of the major selling points for lumia 1320.I don't know why they want to cut corners with something as important as battery.Please vote in the link bellow if you want 3400mAh battery for the new lumia 1330 as well.I know MS would have made up their mind already,yet at least we must show them that they shouldn't downgrade any specs from the older version while bringing up new successor device.

https://windowsphone.uservoice.com/...a-1330-we-need-3400-mah-battery-same-as-lumia

 

[xandros9]

You don't need to worry too much about the processor on lumia 1330 as of now, because you have much more worrying feature than this. the real disappointing fact about lumia 1330 is that it has been rumored to have ONLY 2500mAh battery which is awfully lower than 1320's massive 3400mAh.So battery life will be the real problem on lumia 1330 considering its beefed up specs and camera. and the battery is non-removable.So in my opinion they shouldn't reduce the battery from 3400mAh to 2500mAh.Higher battery was one of the major selling points for lumia 1320.I don't know why they want to cut corners with something as important as battery.Please vote in the link bellow if you want 3400mAh battery for the new lumia 1330 as well.I know MS would have made up their mind already,yet at least we must show them that they shouldn't downgrade any specs from the older version while bringing up new successor device.

https://windowsphone.uservoice.com/...a-1330-we-need-3400-mah-battery-same-as-lumia

Um, it's a rumor.

I could conjure up a rumor saying the 940 would use the 1150 mAh battery pack that the Palm Pre used, I'd wait until we have solid evidence before panicking.
These phones aren't designed and pooped out in a day, there's a lot of thought behind them usually. What material? Why? how big of a battery pack? why? Why not use existing packs? etc.

 

[Joshwin]

Um, it's a rumor.

I could conjure up a rumor saying the 940 would use the 1150 mAh battery pack that the Palm Pre used, I'd wait until we have solid evidence before panicking.
These phones aren't designed and pooped out in a day, there's a lot of thought behind them usually. What material? Why? how big of a battery pack? why? Why not use existing packs? etc.

Yes right,we shouldn't take any notice of rumors.But this one seems true.an official document has leaked recently which clearly says it will have 2500mAh battery.However the name of the device still remains a mystery.Lets hope it isn't lumia 1330.Because I have decided to buy one..

New Microsoft Lumia RM-1109 spotted in regulatory agency filings (Updated) | Windows Central

 

[imnotevenhererightnow]

I'm pretty sure the only thing that's going to matter at this point is whether it's less than $350 or not. I'm looking at where the midrange is shaping up for 2015, and nothing with these kinds of specs really ought to be more than $299.