There was a post today on The Verge about why Android OEMs continue to make Android phones when for the most part there's no money in it.
I was having the exact same discussion with a friend a few days ago. To me the only company that could justify it was Amazon as they have their own store and thus can bring in some money through there. Unfortunately their Fire phone was gimmicky, way overpriced and went nowhere and now they just have tablets. At least there they can continue to sell things to people and if they want they can try dabbling in phones again at some point (I suggest they aim for the $50 market). But for the rest, Samsung are the only ones making any money and that's not guaranteed for long. I can see the "halo" effect and promoting their brand, but it seems like a heavy price to pay. The only company benefiting are Google who take all the money from the Play Store and don't need to take any risk in producing phones (though they do that a little with their Nexus line for some odd reason).
What I was wondering (as a Windows phone fan) is why MS don't offer to share the profits of the Store with these companies in return for producing Windows phones. I think this could be a good strategy (though perhaps too late now). If MS gave each OEM 50% of their cut from the Market (so I guess 15% of the sale) that would surely be an incentive for them to stop producing Android phones that don't make them any money and move to Windows instead. Imagine if LG, HTC, Sony or Samsung went for that and dropped Android. That would be a dramatic shift in the market, give MS the support it requires which would kickstart the long overdue app revolution we've never had.
I was having the exact same discussion with a friend a few days ago. To me the only company that could justify it was Amazon as they have their own store and thus can bring in some money through there. Unfortunately their Fire phone was gimmicky, way overpriced and went nowhere and now they just have tablets. At least there they can continue to sell things to people and if they want they can try dabbling in phones again at some point (I suggest they aim for the $50 market). But for the rest, Samsung are the only ones making any money and that's not guaranteed for long. I can see the "halo" effect and promoting their brand, but it seems like a heavy price to pay. The only company benefiting are Google who take all the money from the Play Store and don't need to take any risk in producing phones (though they do that a little with their Nexus line for some odd reason).
What I was wondering (as a Windows phone fan) is why MS don't offer to share the profits of the Store with these companies in return for producing Windows phones. I think this could be a good strategy (though perhaps too late now). If MS gave each OEM 50% of their cut from the Market (so I guess 15% of the sale) that would surely be an incentive for them to stop producing Android phones that don't make them any money and move to Windows instead. Imagine if LG, HTC, Sony or Samsung went for that and dropped Android. That would be a dramatic shift in the market, give MS the support it requires which would kickstart the long overdue app revolution we've never had.