If you're going to reference me, please reference me correctly.
I am critical of all Non-lumia phones because I've seen the way they treat their customers. Phones not getting updates, OEMS leaving windows phone and then people having to settle for either the current version of software or voiding warranty by using DP, OEMs doing nothing to get the info out that they make Windows phone in the first place and then Blaming Microsoft/Windows phone when it doesn't sell....Releasing Crap looking hardware(The entire Ativ lineup) and Rehashes....
So let me get this straight then, you're blaming HTC for not having the resources to have a dedicated team for their products? Especially the ones that don't sell well? I think you're placing too much faith in HTC. They're not Nokia, who got paid $1 billion dollars, and thus could cover it, and they're not Samsung who has billions to just do whatever it wants. HTC is relatively very small compared to the rest of their market. They've just been recently kicked out of the top 10 OEMs. They've been losing money for a while and only got back on their feet with the M8. Blaming HTC is silly IMHO. Plus, even with their small market share, they still get all of the updates that Lumia owners get, just not all of the firmware features. HTC has consistently been one of the first OEMs to push out a GDR while Nokia has always lagged behind. Or were you referring to the Developer Preview in which we got the updates right after they RTM'd and since Microsoft and HTC couldn't fix a major bug within 5 days, that must obviously mean terrible support right?
Whether people want to admit it or not...The Phone is a hand me down or scraps. It came out months after the Original M8 did and it is nothing to get excited for.
If this was March, yes I'd be more excited. This phone is highly irrelevant by now and we're halfway to the point of a M9.
and when was HTC suppose to make this phone? and what OS were they suppose to put on it in March? They couldn't put WP8 on it because there's no camera button, no capacitive keys, and there would be no interactive case support. They were limited by the OS and that's no one's fault, but Microsoft. Oh, but then you would blame them for "skipping all of the important features of the Android version". Really, there just doesn't seem to be any pleasing you unless it's a Lumia. You've actually gone as far as to somehow say you would prefer the 730 to the One. That boggles my mind, really. What advantage would there be? The 730 will have a worse camera, way worse resolution, still no capacitive keys, no camera button, worse accessories. What would cause you to want that over the HTC One? If you're telling the truth and "the HTC has beautiful hardware" then looks wouldn't matter either. To me, the fact that you explicitatly stated on the main site that "still, I would prefer the Lumia 730 to the HTC One lol" is the most telling point. It's just getting harder and harder to believe what you say is genuine.
I really wish people would stop holding onto the fact of OEMs saving Windows Phone...That is and never has been the problem. When gamechanging phones like the 1020 and 1520 couldn't, what would make an HTC one m8 for windows any different? Even Samsung's half-done efforts are not helping...
Lack of availability of hardware has consistently been a major downside of the Windows Phone experience. Say you wanted a high-end Windows Phone within the past year. What could you get? The Lumia 920 was first released to carriers November 2012, or almost 2 years ago. It's successor first went on sale on July 2014. That's a 21-month span where no new high-end phones were announced. TWENTY. ONE. MONTHS. Assuming a new phone comes out once a year, at roughly the same time, that means that people were waiting 9 months for an upgraded model, Actually, since you're saying that the M8 isn't that big of a deal since the M9 is coming out in about 6 months, we could increase that time to 15 months. I mean, if the 930 came out at a reasonable time, people could just wait.
"Eh, the 920 is kinda old now, I'll just wait for the 930. Hopefully it'll come out in a few months"
*many months go by*
"Well, I haven't heard anything about a new high-end Windows Phone. I'll just get a Galaxy.
Now, if Microsoft hadn't been so slow with updates and got HTC on the bandwagon at launch of the M8, then a) people wanting a high-end Windows phone could've puchased one and b) Windows Phone could've eaten into some of HTC's Android sales. Instead, many people probably just assumed that a successor was never coming out and went for an Android instead.
The problem with Windows Phone is not the fact people dont have choice(They have plenty of Lumias to choose from and Most people on Android are always wanted a High-end lumia).
This is almost a straight up lie. What options at the high-end have we had? We've had 1 choice for a phablet, and one for a regular phone. I follow WPCentral daily, and unless there's some other OEM that's been releasing high-end Windows Phones, then we have not had a "choice" we've had Nokia, Nokia and more Nokia. So let's get real for a second. A lot of people on the website have purchased Nokia because there was literally nothing else to buy. It was either Nokia or leave. I have seen literally hundreds of posts saying "I wish we had 'X' phone, but there's no Windows Phone option".
So let's get real. The phone is great......But it is not the best windows phone, it's nothing fresh and it is not going to save the platform anymore than Nokia did. At best it'll keep up the momentum Nokia has done and even then that is questionable because this is HTC we're talking about.
Many, many , many, MANY reviewers out there will disagree with you. The common theme among most reviews is that this is the nicest Windows Phone available. Many reviewers (where most people go to read about these phones) have applauded the hardware. In the past, reviewers have hated Nokia's phones because of reasons like "too thick, too heavy, feels blocky, etc..." but this phone is the first one to actually get a mostly positive review from the major websites.
Obviously HTC won't single-handedly save Windows Phone. Just like Nokia didn't. Just like Sony won't. Just like LG won't. Just like Samsung can't single-handedly push Android. Obvioulsy, by themselves, there isn't a single OEM to save WP, but a combination of a lot of OEMs hitting the high-end and low-end can, and that's what Microsoft needs. If you can't see that, then I can't help you.