Recent content by DontBeEvil10

Good but still not good enough, the editor is still slow and heavy web tech based

Thanks Nadella /s

you basically didn't care to read why anyone objectively is complaining ... try again.

But but you were so excited about the new "web tech based" outlook, when everyone else was trying to tell you how inferior to Mail it is.

LOL even apple provide better and native apps than the 1st party web crap

Would be nice if they make it available for personal accounts.

FINALLY makes its way to the Microsoft Store ... and it's just a s web app

All thanks to the AMAZING web tech, instead of native UWP one

"Offline support" wow that's revolutionary! no email client did this before! No one expect this feature to be there since the first public preview release! p.s. Do I need to specify that's sarcasm?

What a surprise, he just preferred to take the quick and fast wait: cut the area with less profit = more profits, such a great CEO /s

I loved Surfaces and Windows 10 till they made sense... than everything went downhill moving apps and OS controls to slow, heavy, pen and touch unfriendly web tech.

I was talking about the "new outlook" that will replace Mail of course... I know the "classic" Outlook good, that's great when you have to work with emails a lot and in huge amount, not complaining about it, I can understand if the "classic" outlook is primarly focused on mouse & keyboard. so...

Outlook as "features" is welcome, Outlook as slow, heavy, pen&touch unfriendly that doesn't work offline and doesn't receive notifications when doesn't actually run in background is not, simply they should have used native tech, but they're lazy as hell.

They took ages to "introduce" something windows 8 had since day0

Nothing they couldn't have done with MAil, thye just had to really work on it and adding features ... and it's serious enough for me, I use it and it worked since day 0