So MS has been claiming in their promotional materials that they worked for 3 years on the band and were able to create more accurate and personal energy tracking based on various exercises where traditional step trackers like FitBit would fail.
I was originally very excited as my FitBit was very limiting to only exercises like walking or running and anything else I had to enter manually by selecting the activity and intensity where FitBit would then assign expended calories based on their generic calculation tables.
But when I started using MS Band, I found that the energy tracking was working very different whether I was in exercise mode or not. The very same routines were registering differently depending on if I remembered to start exercise mode on the band or not. Apparently, the band relies a lot on HRM tracking for exercises that do not involve steps or where step tracking becomes unreliable. And where HRM tracking fails, so does the band algorithms.
Remember that famous bug in FitBit where it was tracking your car ride as some ridiculously intensive run because it was too sensitive to car vibration and registered it as steps? Unfortunately, what I found, is that while band is pretty conservative at filtering out false steps (too good for it's own sake sometimes), it's reliance on HRM fails it in car rides just the same.
I decided to track how much energy I spent by sitting in 1 hour traffic on my morning commute. And since the most accurate way to do that, according to MS, is by entering into exercise mode, so I did. By the time I reached office I spent more then 1000 calories!!! And also, according to the band, my average heart rate was close to 180 the whole ride with some peaks over 200!!! That is, except for the times when my hand was off the steering wheel. Because then my heart rate was a more normal 75-80 bpm. The band HRM was too sensitive to the micro vibrations of the steering wheel on the road and even though all other sensors (accelerometers, gyrometers, etc.) should have been telling it that I don't move (relative to my car) and therefore, should not spend my energy, the HRM was showing a cardiac arrest levels and the happy band was counting calories like crazy.
So the question is, has the Band made any improvements in the calorie tracking accuracy, or did it simply exchanged one unreliable tracking mechanism with new one, as unreliable as the old?
I was originally very excited as my FitBit was very limiting to only exercises like walking or running and anything else I had to enter manually by selecting the activity and intensity where FitBit would then assign expended calories based on their generic calculation tables.
But when I started using MS Band, I found that the energy tracking was working very different whether I was in exercise mode or not. The very same routines were registering differently depending on if I remembered to start exercise mode on the band or not. Apparently, the band relies a lot on HRM tracking for exercises that do not involve steps or where step tracking becomes unreliable. And where HRM tracking fails, so does the band algorithms.
Remember that famous bug in FitBit where it was tracking your car ride as some ridiculously intensive run because it was too sensitive to car vibration and registered it as steps? Unfortunately, what I found, is that while band is pretty conservative at filtering out false steps (too good for it's own sake sometimes), it's reliance on HRM fails it in car rides just the same.
I decided to track how much energy I spent by sitting in 1 hour traffic on my morning commute. And since the most accurate way to do that, according to MS, is by entering into exercise mode, so I did. By the time I reached office I spent more then 1000 calories!!! And also, according to the band, my average heart rate was close to 180 the whole ride with some peaks over 200!!! That is, except for the times when my hand was off the steering wheel. Because then my heart rate was a more normal 75-80 bpm. The band HRM was too sensitive to the micro vibrations of the steering wheel on the road and even though all other sensors (accelerometers, gyrometers, etc.) should have been telling it that I don't move (relative to my car) and therefore, should not spend my energy, the HRM was showing a cardiac arrest levels and the happy band was counting calories like crazy.
So the question is, has the Band made any improvements in the calorie tracking accuracy, or did it simply exchanged one unreliable tracking mechanism with new one, as unreliable as the old?