I get that Microsoft is trying to break into the junk phone market (<$60) with the Lumia 530 but they should have called it the Lumia 430.
When people look at phone line up, they see that 530>520 and think that 530 is an upgrade over the 520 when in fact it is a huge downgrade.
The Lumia 530 is bigger, thicker (even though same screen size), slower (don't be fooled by the GHz and the core count, it's CPU and GPU are very slow), barely usable (4 GB storage!? no proximity, light sensors!?)
It is very much the definition of a junk phone.
By naming it the 530, Microsoft will disappoint a lot of consumer because they think they're upgrading when in fact they're getting a downgrade.
The L520 is a fine device, L525 even closer to perfection. It's very disappointing that they decide to continue it up with the 530. Even the 630 can't be considered an upgrade of the 520.
When people look at phone line up, they see that 530>520 and think that 530 is an upgrade over the 520 when in fact it is a huge downgrade.
The Lumia 530 is bigger, thicker (even though same screen size), slower (don't be fooled by the GHz and the core count, it's CPU and GPU are very slow), barely usable (4 GB storage!? no proximity, light sensors!?)
It is very much the definition of a junk phone.
By naming it the 530, Microsoft will disappoint a lot of consumer because they think they're upgrading when in fact they're getting a downgrade.
The L520 is a fine device, L525 even closer to perfection. It's very disappointing that they decide to continue it up with the 530. Even the 630 can't be considered an upgrade of the 520.