Microsoft has a unique feel to it, like all the classic times we went through with our Windows PCs. To be honest, I was shocked a lot when I started using my first Windows Phone. It was tightly locked, not like the PC, you couldn't tweak it so much. But I got over it. It was a phone, afterall. I could always use my PC the way I like it.
The problem of Microsoft's mobile vision is that they are not worthy of their replacing of Nokia Sure, they make stable, durable and solid software/hardware and no one beats them. But Microsoft lacks the vision of consumer-centered approach which the competition has. That's why they successfully sell their crap for a lot of money meanwhile Microsoft can't sell their solid products for lower prices. Back in the day, everone thought that using a computer without Windows is limiting.. It even had an 'app gap' that we came across using WP. You couldn't find a cool game or some software for your desktop computer unless it had Windows installed. And developers chose Windows because that was where the people were.
I remember the good old days where you can only ask people for a phone charger if you had a Nokia. And Nokia had only two types of chargers: thin and thick
Meanwhile all Samsung models had different chargers.
Now, the tables are turned. Even Microsoft focuses harder on iOS/Android apps of their own services than they do on WP. No one buys a Windows Phone, just like no one bought a non-Windows OS back in the day. People got angry when Windows 8 didn't have a start menu. Maybe there is a simple point here: evolution-good, revolution-bad