I really truly hope that it will be better than 960m.
Sure, 960m is way better than Intel chips, but yet I'm afraid it won't be enough to handle any serious 3D games at Surface Book's native resolution.
At least there should be an option for 980m, after all it's supposed to be the most powerful laptop on any planet.
I was about to instant pre-order, but the lack of 1TB version and the uncertainty regarding GPU model, I'll hold my breath...
I doubt GTX 980M is even possible to go into that keyboard portion with current spec. I mean, I believe it is unrealistic expectation. It's just too high expectation.
To me, 960M is still fairly impressive considering how thin the form factor is.
Note i5-6300U has TDP of 15W, and low power consuming family of i7 has also similar TDP. GTX 960M has TDP around 60 W. It means this GPU likely consumes about 4 times more electricity, and generate 4 times more heat than CPU. Dedicated GPU is one of the most power consuming components in PC if not the most(In this case, I believe it is the most). And more heat means it needs more cooling solution, which is more copper/aluminum heatsink/heatpipes and fans.
With thin form factor, it is very difficult to cram in high power consuming processor without having problem.
About 7~8 years ago, I have used 17 inch gaming laptop with Geforce 9800M GS(which has similar TDP compared to GTX 960M), and my laptop battery ran out within 2 hours if I play intense gaming.
Of course, intense gaming and watching video are not same, but 12 hour running times with similar power consuming GPU is still impressive for me, because battery technology has been stagnated and not improved at all. With similar size battery, you should expect about same capacity. and since we are comparing 17 inch gaming laptop to thin 13 inch tablet, I cannot say surface book has much bigger battery. I understand nowadays company starts to minimize their circuit board, and maximize internal space and cram in largest battery as possible. And low battery profiles are more common. But still, there is size difference, and considering these circumstance, that is impressive improvement.
Back to GTX 980M, GTX 980M consumes about double electricity compared to GTX 960M around 122W
Considering these information, can any company possibly cram in GTX 980M into thin & relatively small form factor with 10+ hours of battery life with dissipate heat properly?
My opinion is 'No'. GTX 950M ~ 960M sounds possible(still impressive), but 980M? I think they cannot cram the thing in there. Not just because of battery life, but there is also heat dissipation issue.
I understand your point: GTX960M is not enough for any serious 3D game with 3000x2000 resolution or something similar. However, I doubt they are truly meant for 3D gaming with 3000x2000 resolution.
If they are thin, even laptops that advertize themselves as hardcore gaming laptops(ex:new Razer blade), usually do not have GTX 980M. For example, 2015 Razer blade has 970M, Instead. Note Razer blade also has high 3200x1800 resolution.
And Surface book was not advertized as hardcore gaming laptops; it is even smaller (13.5 inch) than 14inch Razer blade. GTX 980M? That is usually for laptop which is not ultrabook, with 15inch+ size, and giving up all the battery life.
Smallest laptop with GTX 980M in current market I can find is Gigabyte P35X v3, which is 15.6 inch laptop. Of course not thin, and larger than that of surface book, yet has around 3 hours of battery life with casual usage.
Also, note price difference between non dGPU version of Surface book and Surface book with dGPU is merely 200 bucks, and I am also seriously doubt GTX980M is can be bought with 200 bucks. By the way according to dell's Alienware, upgrading from GTX 965M to GTX 980M costs 500 bucks.