Allow me to disagree. :wink:
What you described was your personal position in this debate, which I think was always solid and uncontroversial. What this debate was mostly about, was whether it is fair to rip a pen based on a single technical spec and a brand name, without having had any actual experience with the device. I still have no opinion on the pen itself, but based on how opinions are turning, it seems that single technical spec may not have been quite as important as many professional artists suspected.
Well, I will say that most artists that I've seen have a similar position to mine.
But there are a few, like with anything, that were kind of extreme. And unfortunately, they often scream the loudest.
I think they were shocked by what was kind of like a double whammy.
First...
"No Wacom? It's N-trig? The last time I used N-trig it was horrible!"
Second...
"And the pressure sensitivity is 256 as opposed to 1024? OMG!"
If was what was sort of a bad reputation combined with the reduction in "specs" that caused epic levels of premature disappointment.
Though on the positive side, I don't personally know many artists that are such big fans of Wacom that they won't be willing to use something else that works well. It's not like Apple vs Samsung vs Microsoft. If their buddy says, "Try this..." and it works better... they'll be more than happy to switch. Even if at first they claim that the sky is falling.