Pictures / Video taken with your 1020

[pennzoilgtr]

 

[Nick_1020]

Yeah.. you really need to pick up a cheap ND filter and a couple of rubberbands for this. I have yet to do so myself.

The ND on the 808 Pureview really spoiled me in that regard..

Just took the dog for a walk and managed much better results with long exposures and cars. Gonna try some more over the next few nights as there are better spots to go to.

Any idea on what filters to get please? I think I can sort the rubberbands out though

 

[Nick_1020]

It is impossible to get good results on daylight with that 2.2f aperture. It collects just too much light and photo burns through. Needs to be something over 3.0f or more i guess. It is even harder on my 920 with 2.0f aperture. Needs to be really dark if it is some way doable. On day time impossible.

I'm not sure if the guy who took this photo used a filter or not but it's clearly daytime...mind you, he is a pro!:

May have to drop him a pm.

Edit: Two ND8 and one ND4 filters were used in that photo.

 

[Blacklac]

Snatched this one at work quick.

 

[Zerveone]

Here are some of my recent shots:









I don't know why, but i love the shot below:

 

[liin]

I'm not sure if the guy who took this photo used a filter or not but it's clearly daytime...mind you, he is a pro!:
http://www.nightanddayphoto.ca/misc/forumpics/beyond/Lumia1020/20130913_163501_4773.jpg

All clues point to it being a cloudy evening. You can still overexpose cloudy days by a bit to make it look brighter. There is a lack of not just blown highlights, but just lack of bright highlights in general. Shadows also indicate time is not close noon, that sun is closer to horizon. Plus, just like blurring any action, speed of motion also counts. Maybe that's a rapid.

Edit: Forgot to mention that the sun could be behind a mountain. So the sky looks bright in the background but the sunlight you get in the foreground are reflected sunlight from the atmosphere. So, choosing a spot where sun is behind tall terrains or citiscapes, or if you're deep in a valley, would also work.

I am going to vouch for Kissanviikset's comment that there's no way you can get these types of shots with f/2.2 in bright daylight.

 

[Nick_1020]

Here are some of my recent shots:

View attachment 45557

View attachment 45558

View attachment 45559

View attachment 45560

I don't know why, but i love the shot below:

View attachment 45561

Excellent!

 

[Nick_1020]

Just got some nd filters on ebay...should be here Monday

 

[TK2011]

Snatched this one at work quick.

http://i.imgur.com/SptgWYa.jpg

Great shot! I'm guessing you focused manually? Incredible amount of details. Nice composition as well.

 

[Ed Boland]

Just got some nd filters on ebay...should be here Monday

Got a link?

 

[Nick_1020]

Got a link?

I got them from this seller:
eBay My World - emilyandlily

Will have to wait a few days to see if they're any good though.

 

[iRS73]

I cant upload... Tried different sizes.

 

[Nick_1020]

 

[iRS73]

Edited in Thumba

 

[Blacklac]

Great shot! I'm guessing you focused manually? Incredible amount of details. Nice composition as well.

Thank you. Yes, I used manual focus.

 

[hcrick]

View attachment 45915
View attachment 45916
View attachment 45917
View attachment 45918
View attachment 45919
View attachment 45920
View attachment 45921
View attachment 45922

How did you get the blue effect on your first two shots? Looks other worldly

 

[Nick_1020]

How did you get the blue effect on your first two shots? Looks other worldly

First two pics had the following settings respectively 1/500 ISO-100 and 1/400 ISO-100. I think I was lucky with light and location.

 

[hcrick]

First two pics had the following settings respectively 1/500 ISO-100 and 1/400 ISO-100. I think I was lucky with light and location.

Thanks!

 

[teddyfigo]

Sent from my RM-875_apac_sea_220 using Tapatalk

 

[teddyfigo]

Here mine , not,bad actually .



Sent from my RM-875_apac_sea_220 using Tapatalk