se7en20
New member
the 1520 does better in low light.
An aperture of f/2.2 does better than f/2.4. Small difference but it makes 1020 better in low light.
the 1520 does better in low light.
Someone's people do expect too much, right?I am also very happy with this phone, but sometimes i wish it would be a bit thinner...
I'm already stick with Nokia brand as long as I remember. My first Windows phone is Lumia 800 which amazed me with it's camera. Now I'm using Lumia 625. And I think I'm ready for higher end device.
At first I really love to get ICON but it only available in US. So I think 1020 is the best choice for me.
I already familiar with function since I use wp from 7.5 and I love to see this device.
The thing is my main reason for 1020 is RAM and storage. And I'm not quiet confortable with Oversized phone.
I am also very happy with this phone, but sometimes i wish it would be a bit thinner...
An aperture of f/2.2 does better than f/2.4. Small difference but it makes 1020 better in low light.
I don't live in US so I may have to pay 10 times compared contract priceJust do not buy a ATT branded one unless you plan to stay with ATT.
Yes! You can feel the differnece very well.It weights less (158 g VS 185 g), but could one feel that difference?