How soon people seem to forget that (Iphone 1, Galaxy S1, Nexus) all started off as exclusives. We would all like for exclusives to go away in a perfect world, but I dont see any manufacturer just walking in to the U.S. Market demanding access to all carriers. Google tried to do the direct buying idea with the Nexus 1 but closed that shop up. Yes, the iPhones and Galaxies sell now all across carriers, but that was after some years of generating a fan base and clout to do be able to do that.
The best thing to hope for is for variants. The 920 got two other spinoff's and the 800 as well. The one thing about exclusives is that they dont last forever which is good, it's mainly a basis to see what the demand is before opening up all access to see if they make a profit from a business sense. Palm had to do the same thing and the hype wasn't there. I feel other carriers will get variants as the 1520 is a big deal (no pun intended) lol.
1. We live in 2013, not 2007 (iPhone), 2009 (Palm), or 2010 (Galaxy S1, Nexus One). The Nexus One came out in 2010. The first Windows Phone came out in 2010. Carrier/OEM dynamics have changed (obviously not enough, but nonetheless, they've changed.)
2. Exactly which fervent US LG fanbase made it so that the G2 could be one all carriers?
3. Exactly which fervent US BlackBerry fanbase made it so that the Q10/Z10 could be on 3+ US carriers?
4. Exactly which fervent US HTC fanbase made it so that the One & 8X could be on 3+ US carriers?
5. As an early adopter, I (and likely many people in the Mobile Nations forums community) am not willing to wait 6 months for exclusivity to end. By that time, the phone will be outdated and not worth spending $650+ on.
Believe me, I know my smartphone history and I know how and why device exclusives were so important in the past. However that doesn't mean it must always be that way. People are starting to recognize and identify with specific device models & brands that are
not exclusive to carriers, much to the carrier's chagrin I'm sure. Additionally, as I've said in a couple other posts in this thread - it should be
painfully obvious that AT&T WP exclusives
are not working. US WP marketshare is still abysmal and 2+ years of AT&T Nokia flagship exclusives has barely moved the needle. It's time for a different approach.
What I'm starting to think is that Nokia must have made a similar deal with AT&T that Apple did in 2007. That AT&T was willing to bet on Nokia/WP if and only if they got a 3+ year exclusivity deal on all Nokia flagships. I guess we should thank our lucky stars that AT&T was generous enough to allow variants on other carriers months after initial flagship release? A lot of good that's doing WP in the US overall marketshare.