Does anyone have any specs or info on the 20mp camera? Sensor size, lenses etc? What are the differences compared to 41mp.
All (!) the specifications of the Nokia Lumia 1520 | PureView ClubIMAGING
Here at the PureViewClub of course, we’re all especially interested in the camera. I guess we all knew the Nokia Lumia 1520 will have a 20MP camerasensor, Pureview Optical Image Stabilisation, the aperture is f/2.4.
It has no Xenon flash, but dual LED flash. The Nokia Lumia 1520 shoots video in Full HD (1080p), the front camera has a 1.2 MP sensor (and “Skype HD” 720p).
A few more numbers to compare it with the Nokia Lumia 1020 in detail:
- The sensor size is smaller: 1/2’5″ (25mm2) instead of 1/1’5″ (50mm2).
- Pixel technology is the same as on the Nokia Lumia 1020: 1.12um BSI Toshiba.
- The 20MP sensor shoots 19MP in 4:3 and 17MP in 16:9
- The camera offers 2x “hi-resolution” (= lossless) zoom in 5MP (3x in 1080p video).
- Optics design is the same as in the Lumia 1020: 1 glass + 5 plastic lenses.
- Aperture: F2.4 on the Lumia 1520 (F2.2 on the 1020)
- OIS is the same system: Barrel shift with 1/3s in auto mode
- Low light (module SNR10): 14 lux (9 lux on the 1020)
The better camera is the 1020 .was hoping for a bigger pixels. Some of the samples going around are nice, but I'm not convinced yet. Maybe I'm spoiled by the 920, but I dont think it's too much to wait for a better camera...or at least see some better shots from fellow forum members
Like Kissan posted above, the pixel size is 1.12um, about the same as all the other 13MP shooteres out there using Sony's 13MP Exmor-RS sensor like the Xperia Z, LG G2, Note 3, S4, etc. You get a few more MP to downsample with, but the per pixel quality and dynamic range and light sensitivity shouldn't be that different. In the end, they are all very small cell phone sensors. Nokia, however, has the much better OIS and processing and manual controls, at the expense of speed. In the end, it's really just a cut down version of the 41MP Pureview sensor. That's why I am a bit disappointed since I was expecting some new tech. Like many a better implementation of the Moto X's clearpixels or something. The Xperia Z1 actually has a bigger sensor at 1/2.3". I dislike their processing though, and the horrid screen and lack of OIS. I guess its quite a feat to cram a 1/2.5" sensor with OIS in the 8.7mm body, but I would've liked something closer to the Lumia 1020 with a thicker body, smaller screen, and better camera. A 5" version of the Lumia 1020 with modern specs. And the neverending question of why Nokia released the Lumia 1020 so early remains...
Why?I wait for a 1030
Well, if the 1030 is 1080p quad core and improved sensor that would be great. If not, or there is no 1020 successor, then 1020 will be cheaper by then. I really want to believe that the 1020 is not a one off. I hope there is at least one more version with camera on par or better than the 808. Add quad core and 1080p..I'll be pumpedWhy?
And why not wait until 1040? Or 1050? Or 1060?
Windows Phone 8 doesn't' need Quad Core. It's not Android.
Why?
And why not wait until 1040? Or 1050? Or 1060?
This^The 1020 needs that Snap 800 SoC.. more than any other phone it would make a big difference, especially if they optimize it.
The 1020 camera feels slower than the 808's, which is unacceptable considering how much more powerful the 1020 is in terms of hardware.
Like Kissan posted above, the pixel size is 1.12um, about the same as all the other 13MP shooteres out there using Sony's 13MP Exmor-RS sensor like the Xperia Z, LG G2, Note 3, S4, etc. You get a few more MP to downsample with, but the per pixel quality and dynamic range and light sensitivity shouldn't be that different. In the end, they are all very small cell phone sensors. Nokia, however, has the much better OIS and processing and manual controls, at the expense of speed. In the end, it's really just a cut down version of the 41MP Pureview sensor. That's why I am a bit disappointed since I was expecting some new tech. Like many a better implementation of the Moto X's clearpixels or something. The Xperia Z1 actually has a bigger sensor at 1/2.3". I dislike their processing though, and the horrid screen and lack of OIS. I guess its quite a feat to cram a 1/2.5" sensor with OIS in the 8.7mm body, but I would've liked something closer to the Lumia 1020 with a thicker body, smaller screen, and better camera. A 5" version of the Lumia 1020 with modern specs. And the neverending question of why Nokia released the Lumia 1020 so early remains...
Do you have a 1020?1020 is slow as hell when taking pictures