Look at every other "mini" phone out there (gs4 mini, one mini, z2 compact etc...)
None of those mini phones are as thin as their bigger counterparts.... So why would Nokia be able to do pull that off but not any other company?
Also, haven't you noticed that the 1520 design is very similar to the 925?? The 925 is pretty much a mini 1520!
I think we'll see the 930 (920 successor) as a first 8.1 device, and then later on the 935 (925 successor) will come to some specific carriers because of all that BS exclusivity you guys have in the us
(no 1520 mini)
the z1 compact is pretty much identical bar the screen size and battery to the z1 , like I say if you think about it why couldn't you put the 1520 into a 925 shell?? apart from the screen and battery its only a cpu and gpu upgrade a bit more ram the camera is taken care of by the hump anyways isn't it?
the only reason the 1520 is so big is for the screen and the superb battery you could easily trim it down and make a 1520 mini with the same cpu , the same gpu , the same ram , the same camera , a micro sd slot , wireless charging etc , even if they took wireless charging out a 1520 would be very very possible
the z1 has a camera with a bigger sensor then the 1520 but has no camera hump and that is about 1520 thickness , maybe just a tad thicker , so I am sure they could make a phone with the 1520 design just a bit smaller specially if it had the camera hump like the 1520 ;-)
the only reason others haven't made a high end mini is because they have been rinising the flagship name and then selling an underspecced mini version with the flagship name to make more money