1. saintforlife's Avatar
    Ativ S vs Lumia 920:

    1.5 GHz Dual Core vs 1.5 GHz Dual Core - Draw

    1GB vs 1GB - Draw

    Screen Size:
    4.8" vs 4.5" - Ativ S

    Screen Resolution (ppi):
    306 ppi vs 332 ppi - Lumia 920

    Screen Quality:
    HD Super AMOLED vs PureMotion HD+ - Lumia 920

    8.7 mm vs 10.7 mm - Ativ S

    135 gms vs 185 gms - Ativ S

    2300 mAh vs 2000 mAh - Ativ S

    16/32 GB (with micro SD expandable) vs 32 GB - Ativ S

    8 MP vs 8.7 MP PureView - Lumia 920

    Can we call it a draw between these Super Phones in terms of specifications?

    The Lumia 920 has an ever so slight edge overall due to its exclusive apps, software, camera technology and looks. The Samsung Ativ S wins in the portability, screen size, battery life and storage departments.

    People can't go wrong with either of these phones. Both are amazing devices in their own right IMHO.

    Reflexx likes this.
    09-08-2012 12:07 AM
  2. Reflexx's Avatar
    They're both great handsets.

    It will end up depending what a particular person's priority is in their smartphone.

    A person preferring a light phone with expandable memory will get the Samsung.

    A person who wants a nicer screen and camera will get the Nokia.

    Choices are great to have.
    09-08-2012 01:33 AM
  3. blehblehbleh's Avatar
    Choices are great to have.
    Heheh not when there are on such opposite sides of the spectrum. It kills me that the 920 doesn't have a removable card slot or large standard battery capacity.

    I hope someone puts in a nice middle ground within the next 6 months.
    09-08-2012 02:16 AM
  4. jimski's Avatar
    Good comparison, except for the size and weight, which are subjective. Those two areas are informative, but you can't declare a winner, unless you are simply stating your personal opinion. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

    Sent from my Lumia 900 using Board Express Pro
    09-08-2012 02:16 AM