Nokia ****** order of operations:
1. The images were uploaded to imagehosting sites that compress images! Wait for a "real" review from pros!
2. You can't trust reviews from those small dinky sites I never heard of! They have it in for Nokia! Wait for the big sites!
3. The big sites are being paid by Apple! They rushed, biased messes! Wait for reviews from thorough, intelligent sites!
4. Those wordy sites are all fluff! They are lies, all lies!
5. The camera is not that important! It's "good" enough! I see no problems! WTF go buy a real camera! This is a phone!
6. Shut out rest of world. Live in dream world Nokia land inside head.
Reality Check:
Most people were waiting for the Lumia 920 for the camera. These are WP8 phones. They are near identical in most respects anyhow. Nokia attached the name "PureView" to the phone and hyped the **** out of it. Other than the phone design, which they had already mostly used on the Lumia 900, the only thing they had was the camera. Some of you may claim otherwise or not care at all about it, but the camera is the make or break moment for the Lumia 920. You can go get the 8X or Ativ S and be assured to take better detailed daytime shots instead of wasting time with Nokia.
Did I expect any miracles? No. The point is, it can't even achieve the same level of detail as the iPhone 4S/5, the Galaxy S II/III, nor the HTC One X/8X. That's two generations of phones, some over 18 months old, that beat it out. Nokia was too smug and focused too much on the OIS system while ignoring the sensor itself entirely. The Lumia 900 was a blurry, unsharp mess and they haven't made much progress since then.