Pretty good review. Even The Verge's review was decent (minus the numerical scorings). Really make that Pocket-lint review look like a troll post.
The Verge gave the Nexus 4 the same score as the 920 for camera. No joke lol.
Pretty good review. Even The Verge's review was decent (minus the numerical scorings). Really make that Pocket-lint review look like a troll post.
The Verge gave the Nexus 4 the same score as the 920 for camera. No joke lol.
To the commenters saying the camera is working a intense are completely wrong. The phone was touted as having the most impressive camera in a smart phone aside of the 808. It's has 8.7 mp Carl Zeiss optics with ios. It's not supposed to take blurry, soft, detail less ,fuzzy, shots in broad daylight. I don't care how any of you try to sugar coat it. Every camera on a phone or an actual camera should take excellent images during daylight . Something is wrong with the optics or software that processes the images . The camera is not the way it should be. Now if Nokia designed their new flagship phone to take decent not great pictures during the day then they deserve to have a company in the current state that its in. I want a 920, I want a cyan 920 but I don't want a new smart phone that has a camera that doesn't produce great pictures . Especially one that can't take pictures better than camera phones that were released years before it
I am always confused about the criteria they use when it comes to the camera of any phone.. not just the verge, but almost all of them.The Verge gave the Nexus 4 the same score as the 920 for camera. No joke lol.
"As is to be expected, our global model crams in quad-band radios with GSM / GPRS / EDGE (850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900MHz), UMTS / HSPA+ (850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100MHz) and LTE (800 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600MHz) bands,"
So does that mean this phone can use HSPA+ on T-Mobile?
Juz sharing my 2cents...
920 is SMARTPHONE with a respectable built-in camera feature. Its not a "smart camera" with a innovative built-in phone feature. All these so-called techsite reviewers giving lukewarm rating on the 920's camera feature are "putting the cart before the horse".
I love WP because "it is the most personal smartphone EVER". It is a very individualistic & technologically liberating smartphone out there. It frees me spiritually from other suffocating & confusing mobile options currently in the market. I dun care what other people think, I am upgrading from my 900 to 920 despite the camera and/or weight. WP/Lumia indulge You, not the other way round. Think Simple & Don't Over-Analyse, Cheers
Good advice, after having a chance to look and feel the demo units I'm happy with the size and weight. The camera is still one of the best out there and other issues can be fixed in software. I think its a great time to be a windows phone fan. We have the best phones between the 920 and the 8x and no doubt the Ativ S will also prove to be fantastic.
To the commenters saying the camera is working a intense are completely wrong. The phone was touted as having the most impressive camera in a smart phone aside of the 808. It's has 8.7 mp Carl Zeiss optics with ios. It's not supposed to take blurry, soft, detail less ,fuzzy, shots in broad daylight. I don't care how any of you try to sugar coat it. Every camera on a phone or an actual camera should take excellent images during daylight . Something is wrong with the optics or software that processes the images . The camera is not the way it should be. Now if Nokia designed their new flagship phone to take decent not great pictures during the day then they deserve to have a company in the current state that its in. I want a 920, I want a cyan 920 but I don't want a new smart phone that has a camera that doesn't produce great pictures . Especially one that can't take pictures better than camera phones that were released years before it
doesnt Tmoble use a 1700 mhz band?