The Windows 10 April 2018 update has arrived! Get the new Dell XPS 15, starting at $999.99
02-11-2013 02:34 AM
53 123
tools
  1. Heron_Kusanagi's Avatar
    Amazing low light performance which is still not better than SGS3.

    I compared my pics to a SGS3 in all kind of scenarios, high light, low light and no light without flash and i was deeply disappointed.

    I've had windows phones since the early days so please don't think im trolling or over exaggerating!!
    You exhibit all signs of being a troll.
    JSern, congusano, gnrthx and 2 others like this.
    11-11-2012 06:49 AM
  2. misterRafter's Avatar
    You exhibit all signs of being a troll.
    I very much doubt that.

    Read my previous posts, i love the phone just disappointed with camera!

    Actually im looking forward to when i can get hold of a Samsung Ativ S. Comparisons with phone will be interesting
    11-11-2012 07:00 AM
  3. ynight's Avatar
    Amazing low light performance which is still not better than SGS3.

    I compared my pics to a SGS3 in all kind of scenarios, high light, low light and no light without flash and i was deeply disappointed.

    I've had windows phones since the early days so please don't think im trolling or over exaggerating!!
    ......u must be kidding then. The low light pics are truly second to none.sgs3 in low light is just normal as the normal.
    11-11-2012 07:02 AM
  4. JSern's Avatar
    You mean that phone that has a faster processor AND a better camera? Some people who live in lala land never cease to amaze me.




    Lack of sharpening is not the reason the camera sucks. Lumia phones have been living in blurry-ville since the very first 800. It's been well criticized and frankly such an obvious flaw that even regular consumers will notice without it being pointed out to them. How they can continue to market their cameras as bleeding edge, much less 8MP, is beyond me. People keep on claiming some magical update will fix all these problems. The fact that it was released in this state already points to its limitations. No other lumia phone has gotten a magical update that fixes something of this magnitude. I hope no one is making their purchasing decisions based on a pipedream update. This is as good as its gonna get, take it or leave it.
    Seems like we got a hater here
    11-11-2012 07:06 AM
  5. GT2010's Avatar
    You mean that phone that has a faster processor AND a better camera? Some people who live in lala land never cease to amaze me.




    Lack of sharpening is not the reason the camera sucks. Lumia phones have been living in blurry-ville since the very first 800. It's been well criticized and frankly such an obvious flaw that even regular consumers will notice without it being pointed out to them. How they can continue to market their cameras as bleeding edge, much less 8MP, is beyond me. People keep on claiming some magical update will fix all these problems. The fact that it was released in this state already points to its limitations. No other lumia phone has gotten a magical update that fixes something of this magnitude. I hope no one is making their purchasing decisions based on a pipedream update. This is as good as its gonna get, take it or leave it.
    katamari201 you are a other example of a dumb fkn iphone ihtc user so please go post your lame useless comments elsewhere ;)
    Lumia 920 = the Best
    Your phone = shty
    11-11-2012 07:28 AM
  6. GT2010's Avatar
    I very much doubt that.

    Read my previous posts, i love the phone just disappointed with camera!

    Actually im looking forward to when i can get hold of a Samsung Ativ S. Comparisons with phone will be interesting
    Dont worry misterRafter is a dumb user he thinks really Lumia 920 not the best hes a troller he doesnt know what hes talking about and hes got no evidence to back it up
    misterRafter go fkc yourself buddy ;)
    11-11-2012 07:35 AM
  7. misterRafter's Avatar
    Dont worry misterRafter is a dumb user he thinks really Lumia 920 not the best hes a troller he doesnt know what hes talking about and hes got no evidence to back it up
    misterRafter go fkc yourself buddy ;)
    You do make me laugh. There was a reason why i paid so much for this phone coz i like windows phone n the quality build of Nokias. But understand one thing whoever u are the camera is good but not the best!!
    11-11-2012 08:46 AM
  8. PBNkapamilya's Avatar
    Amazing low light performance which is still not better than SGS3.

    I compared my pics to a SGS3 in all kind of scenarios, high light, low light and no light without flash and i was deeply disappointed.

    I've had windows phones since the early days so please don't think im trolling or over exaggerating!!
    Pics or it didn't happen. Seriously.
    naw1 likes this.
    11-11-2012 08:50 AM
  9. misterRafter's Avatar
    Dont worry misterRafter is a dumb user he thinks really Lumia 920 not the best hes a troller he doesnt know what hes talking about and hes got no evidence to back it up
    misterRafter go fkc yourself buddy ;)
    You do make me laugh. There was a reason why i paid so much for this phone coz i like windows phone n the quality build of Nokias. But understand one thing whoever u are the camera is good but not the best!!
    11-11-2012 09:47 AM
  10. naw1's Avatar
    mind showing photos? i would like to see them and judge before i buy one.
    11-11-2012 10:20 AM
  11. keizka's Avatar
    Amazing low light performance which is still not better than SGS3.

    I compared my pics to a SGS3 in all kind of scenarios, high light, low light and no light without flash and i was deeply disappointed.

    I've had windows phones since the early days so please don't think im trolling or over exaggerating!!
    So... where are these photos so we could compare?
    11-11-2012 10:48 AM
  12. karmamule's Avatar
    Amazing low light performance which is still not better than SGS3.

    I compared my pics to a SGS3 in all kind of scenarios, high light, low light and no light without flash and i was deeply disappointed.

    I've had windows phones since the early days so please don't think im trolling or over exaggerating!!
    Almost all reviews have highly praised the 920s low light photos, and several sites have specifically posted low light shots comparing the 920 to the SGS3 and shown how much better the 920 is.

    Many 920 owners, including myself, have seen how amazing the 920 is in low light situations.

    If you're going to claim something counter to all that experience reviewers and owners have in showing the best-in-class low light performance the 920s camera has, you really need to post photos showing why you say that, otherwise we have no reason to find that statement credible.
    keizka and Residing like this.
    11-11-2012 10:50 AM
  13. misterRafter's Avatar
    Ill post u pics in the morning
    11-11-2012 10:51 AM
  14. ratchetjaw#AC's Avatar
    I am happy with my pics. Could be a tad sharper but happy 😊

    Sent from my Glossy White Lumia 920 using Board Express
    11-11-2012 10:52 AM
  15. keizka's Avatar
    With full exif data, I hope.
    11-11-2012 10:53 AM
  16. Reflexx's Avatar
    Amazing low light performance which is still not better than SGS3.



    I compared my pics to a SGS3 in all kind of scenarios, high light, low light and no light without flash and i was deeply disappointed.



    I've had windows phones since the early days so please don't think im trolling or over exaggerating!!

    I'm experiencing excellent, almost unbelievable, low light performance without needing flash.

    I really have no idea what is causing your issues. I was at a wedding reception last night, and there was low light and a dance floor. I filmed video and took pictures. People with various new Android and Apple devices were literally in awe with jaws dropped looking at what it could do.


    In low light, it even out performed many stock DSLR cameras.
    11-11-2012 10:57 AM
  17. eortizr's Avatar
    Nokia never fixed the issue on the 900. How can anybody think. It will be fixed on the 920.

    Sent from my RM-820_nam_att_100 using Board Express
    11-11-2012 11:31 AM
  18. gnrthx's Avatar
    You obviously do not have a 920, or you would not be saying that. When you take a photo with the 920 you actually watch the capture on the screen magically go from a beautiful perfectly detailed raw image into a much softer jpeg image. It's painfully obvious that it is just a software issue, as you can clearly see what the camera is capable of right before the conversion.

    I've made the switch from the iPhone 4s, and I am completely satisfied with this camera. The first thing I did was compare the two, and it definitely outperforms in most scenarios.

    Here's one of the shots I've taken and edited with fhotoroom.
    https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resi...4FAF0878AF!142
    These are gorgeous!
    11-11-2012 11:45 AM
  19. Reflexx's Avatar
    Nokia never fixed the issue on the 900. How can anybody think. It will be fixed on the 920.

    Sent from my RM-820_nam_att_100 using Board Express

    Nokia did roll out a fix that significantly improved the 900's camera. It wasn't up to iPhone levels, but it was a real improvement from what it was before the fix.
    11-11-2012 11:51 AM
  20. Winfonejunkie's Avatar
    Amazing low light performance which is still not better than SGS3.

    I compared my pics to a SGS3 in all kind of scenarios, high light, low light and no light without flash and i was deeply disappointed.

    I've had windows phones since the early days so please don't think im trolling or over exaggerating!!
    Hey moron! Sell your Lumia (assuming you own one) and get a SGSIII already. Your ranting and raving is getting freaking ridiculous.
    hipporama likes this.
    11-11-2012 04:23 PM
  21. lordofthereef's Avatar
    Hey moron! Sell your Lumia (assuming you own one) and get a SGSIII already. Your ranting and raving is getting freaking ridiculous.
    Let's not go there. There is enough of that crap in the iOS forums. Let's try to be objective. The camera, out of the box, isn't as good as the hype lead us to believe, IMO. Just relax and enjoy a civilized discussion.
    vizitator likes this.
    11-11-2012 04:25 PM
  22. DungMasterFang's Avatar
    Nokia never fixed the issue on the 900. How can anybody think. It will be fixed on the 920.

    Sent from my RM-820_nam_att_100 using Board Express
    Did Nokia fix the AT&T Lumia 900
    11-11-2012 04:40 PM
  23. chuck232's Avatar
    It seems like there are two categories of photo "quality" that is being discussed here. First off, in low-light, the optical image stabilization does a wonderful job, eliminating camera shake to a great degree. That results in sharper photos and/or ability to capture more light.

    However, despite that, it does appear that the photos captured are soft, bordering on out of focus. In bright light where a very fast shutter speed is used (OIS isn't impacting image quality much, if at all in these situations), details are still lost. I don't know if this is a general issue or isolated to a few, bad hardware samples. I notice it on my 920, for example, and a couple reviews have also mentioned it.

    Hopefully, this is nothing a software fix can't eliminate.
    11-11-2012 06:06 PM
  24. Sonia213's Avatar
    Im not making stuff up to bash Nokia but this is the second time I've been disappointed! Firstly with 900 now 920.

    When we wait for so long for a phone that has had the worst launch ever and then we pay a a hefty fee of 450 for a sim free (wtf still locked) then i have a right to express my feelings towards Nokia.

    Someone needs to get a wet fish and slap it across S.Elop's face so that he wakes the fuk up and stop BSing the consumers!!
    I agree with you i don't like Nokia mobile..

    Canon Camera
    Last edited by Sonia213; 02-12-2013 at 06:50 AM.
    02-10-2013 11:20 PM
  25. unstoppablekem's Avatar
    There is an expected software update from Nokia about daylight quality issue.
    Which is taking nokia too long to fix. And no, the Portico update plus nokias "fixes" didn't help either.
    02-10-2013 11:41 PM
53 123
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD