[Karthik Naik]

I never said "Same price, same size but, one is lacking a feature." Read with more attention. What I proposed was various versions with differents features, differents prices for differentes users. So: If there are users that dont want wireless charging and there is a phone with a good price.... And again: There is a Lumia 1520 version with no wireless charging that is a little less thicker and lighter.

i agree with your intentions but removing wireless charging wont really reduce pricing,thickness by much,they would rather offer it in a smaller size and same design but lesser resolution screen and call it 1515 or something

*drools if such a phone ever comes out*

[Pete The Penguin]

Everyone complains about poor battery life in smartphones; yet what's needed are two things: 1) better battery efficiency and 2) screens that use less power at a given size.

I'm quite happy my 930 uses the 800 instead of the 801.
Why? Because the 930 does all I need and having a slightly faster SoC wouldn't make me any more efficient.

[YanivC]

No offense but I think you got a couple of lemons.
I say this only because my old GS5 got over a days worth of medium to heavy use and my Lumia 925 gets fantastic battery life.
Are you sure you dont have some crazy apps on your GS5? We all know how notorious Android is for letting anything run in the background whenever it/the developer wants.

[jpal12]

The 801 does not use more power, both chips are way underclocked must of the time. It may even get better battery, like for decoding video.