clbarker10
New member
4" As long as I don't have to use 2 hands while holding it...I don't feel right posting this for some reason.
DC: so why so you need a flagship phone?
Yes, I get that flagship phones are better in specs, but to what end? What tasks do you perform on your phone that require it to be top specced when viewing comfort isn't a priority?
Personally I webbrowse a lot, so a big screen is a huge boost to that experience. I also play a bit and watch loads of video, both of which also take a big bump from a larger screen.
Im just unsure what features a flagship phone offers that are not screen related but that a midrange device cannot do equally well .
The camera: fine. But then again that seems like a 808 might be the better deal. However it doesn't have LTE, but Im unsure why LTE is required anyways unless youre streaming huge quantities of data (like movies)?
If you see my point.
I had an 808 last year for a while. The camera resolution is crazy - you can crop down to a small section of the original photo and still have good resolution. And yes, Symbian Belle is a huge advance and should be fine for a lot of people. However... the 808 is still big. (With good reason, but still...)Should try the 808 . Great screen, great camera, Belle is quite good recently, etc.
DC: so why so you need a flagship phone?
I have the original titan and love the screen size. Why have more bezel than screen, if I want to look at the color of the phone I'll flip it over.4.5-4.7 with a small bezel is perfect for me. The Titan 2 felt like it was the right size and weight in my hands.
I have the original titan and love the screen size. Why have more bezel than screen, if I want to look at the color of the phone I'll flip it over.
What size was the original titan? I agree (as probably most) with a minimum bezel.