More Windows phone Update are coming later this year...

uopjo6

New member
Jan 5, 2012
171
0
0
Visit site
When you think Storage = money, I feel im being robbed with the Other Storage taking more than 5GB of space and MS not addressing this problem for 5 months.
 

iBandar

New member
Feb 18, 2012
103
0
0
Visit site
Not having screenshot in Windows Phone 7 still blows my mind. When you press the back button it shows all the apps running in screenshot type of way, why is it hard to have a functionality to save the image? Like wtf. And also screen rotation and custom playlist.

These are the most BASIC things you could offer in a smartphone and its missing :lol: I am a die hard Windows Phone supporter so when I am defending the platform and converting people to use Windows Phone, its embarrassing to say it doesn’t offer these basic functionality.
 

red grenadine

New member
Nov 27, 2010
558
2
0
Visit site
Its not about how many updates we get , its about how soon are they going to add the plethora of basic things missing.

That's the problem for me. As someone who has been with the platform since day 1 with a Samsung Focus, to not have basic feature parity after 3 years is unexcusable.
 

Schmitty63

New member
Apr 28, 2013
10
0
0
Visit site
If they don't get this voice mail message as email attachment .wav file issue squared away they will be once again shooting themselves in the foot. I cannot play attached voice mails on my WP, which are generated as .wav files by our new Shoretel system, while everyone at my firm with an iPhone or Android can. The single biggest impediment to others switching to WP at my firm.

THIS and notifications is all i need to make this perfect platform my needs. I voted "yes" on another thread about stating with WP, but these two items are a necessity. Actually the .wav file is a necessity, notifications would be secondary.
 

a5cent

New member
Nov 3, 2011
6,622
0
0
Visit site
There has been a few articles going around saying that MS is trying to include WP Blue with GDR3. I really, really, really hope so. MS needs some fire under their butts.

That isn't what those articles said.

Microsoft is adding almost all new features to WP8.1. But WP8.1 isn't just about adding new features to the OS. It is also about evolving the OS itself.

Due to all the outrage, Microsoft is now looking to take some of those features and ship them together with GDR3. However, because those features are being developed for WP8.1, which is further evolved than WP8.0 / GDR3, Microsoft must adapt those features back to the current OS structure of WP8.0, which is also a lot of work. So, basically, in order to give us some WP8.1 features a bit sooner, as part of GDR3, Microsoft will end up doing some things twice, slowing the overall progress of WP even further. That isn't a good thing, so Microsoft will focus on just a small subset of features, and those features won't necessarily be those on our most-wanted lists, but those which are most easily backported to WP8.0.

This has been part of Microsoft's problem all along. They have always been developing user facing features on top of an operating system that is constantly shifting under their feet. That is a lot more work than doing some recoloring and slight OS tweaking, and then focusing all your remaining resources on user facing functionality and apps. Android and iOS are in the enviable position of being able to do that. Microsoft isn't, or at least they aren't if they want to realize their vision of a unified OS spanning smartphones, tablets and desktops.

I'm not trying to excuse Microsoft here. I do agree that they need to change some of their priorities and at least address those issues which don't go any deeper than the UI (like volume controls).
 
Last edited:

Strings78

New member
Mar 26, 2012
49
0
0
Visit site
MS needs to get the carriers out of the way like Apple has done. The carriers only interest is selling new devices on contracts. They have ZERO interest in allowing device updates. MS needs to push some of it's weight around and gang up on the carriers WITH Apple. This whole situation is a massive load of crap.
I could not agree with this more!!! Microsoft needs to take the middle man out of it and push updates straight to the consumers. That would solve a lot of headaches on all ends
 

a5cent

New member
Nov 3, 2011
6,622
0
0
Visit site
I could not agree with this more!!! Microsoft needs to take the middle man out of it and push updates straight to the consumers. That would solve a lot of headaches on all ends

At one point during the WP7 era, it looked like that was exactly what they were going to do. In fact, that is what first got me interested in WP. Unfortunately, it looks like they are going in the exact opposite direction.
 

Kevin N Smith

New member
Mar 12, 2013
502
0
0
Visit site
I'll wait until W8.1 until I decide weather I want to keep with Windows Phone or not. They would also need to speed the updates up past then if they want to keep gaining marketshare and such.
 

Aaron Bateman

New member
Jun 5, 2013
67
0
0
Visit site
I could not agree with this more!!! Microsoft needs to take the middle man out of it and push updates straight to the consumers. That would solve a lot of headaches on all ends

I do not see why it is an issue. They have the infrastructure in place to do this already. Just point the damn things at windows update.

Imagine if Windows/SQL/etc had to have Dell and HP approve the updates before being pushed out... *shudder*
 

a5cent

New member
Nov 3, 2011
6,622
0
0
Visit site
I do not see why it is an issue. They have the infrastructure in place to do this already. Just point the damn things at windows update.

It's a political and a legal issue. It isn't a technical issue.

Until recently, all WP updates were delivered to all users directly from Microsoft's servers. They already had functionality similar to "Windows Update in place for WP:

1. MS releases an update to the OEM
2. OEM installs update on their devices, tests it and then sends it to carriers for additional testing
3. Carriers sign off on the update and give MS the permission to distribute the update on their network
4. MS flips a switch which starts the OS update rollout (for a specific device and for a specific carrier)

It has always been that way since WP7. Since GDR2 some things have changed however, so I don't know exactly what the situation is now. From what I understand MS is loosing even more flexibility. :-(
 

tgp

New member
Dec 1, 2012
4,519
0
0
Visit site
It's a political and a legal issue. It isn't a technical issue.

Until recently, all WP updates were delivered to all users directly from Microsoft's servers. They already had functionality similar to "Windows Update in place for WP:

1. MS releases an update to the OEM
2. OEM installs update on their devices, tests it and then sends it to carriers for additional testing
3. Carriers sign off on the update and give MS the permission to distribute the update on their network
4. MS flips a switch which starts the OS update rollout (for a specific device and for a specific carrier)

It has always been that way since WP7. Since GDR2 some things have changed however, so I don't know exactly what the situation is now. From what I understand MS is loosing even more flexibility. :-(

The way I understand it this is pretty much how Apple rolls out updates. They of course don't have the OEMs to go through, but the update does go to the carriers with a strict timeline of when to have it approved. Google is working on reducing fragmentation of Android with Nexus and Google Editions of other OEM devices, but so far they've barely scratched the surface. It's interesting that Microsoft seems to be moving away from this update method.
 

a5cent

New member
Nov 3, 2011
6,622
0
0
Visit site
The way I understand it this is pretty much how Apple rolls out updates. They of course don't have the OEMs to go through, but the update does go to the carriers with a strict timeline of when to have it approved. Google is working on reducing fragmentation of Android with Nexus and Google Editions of other OEM devices, but so far they've barely scratched the surface. It's interesting that Microsoft seems to be moving away from this update method.


I don't think 'interesting' is the word I would have used. Tragic seems more fitting :-/
I don't know anything technical in regard to how Apple does their updates. That you say the process is similar doesn't surprise me.

In contrast to Apple, MS bends over whenever a carrier tells them to (more sad than it is surprising, as MS has no leverage with carriers).

For WP there are no update timelines. For WP there is no alternative to OTA updates, so ever since WP8, carriers are in full control of the update process (giant step backward from WP7). For WP carriers have no obligation to even test an update, much less distribute it if they don't want to.

It's quite pathetic.
 

jmshub

Moderator
Apr 16, 2011
2,667
0
0
Visit site
The sad part is what others have said, it's not Microsoft's inability to ship. It's the carriers just sitting on the update and refusing to deliver. It's a shame. It's the same problem from day one of WP7. I don't know how to solve the issue. Microsoft can't just strong arm the carriers. Carriers appear to be immune to bad customer reviews. The harder they are hated by the customers, the happier they all seem to be!
 

tgp

New member
Dec 1, 2012
4,519
0
0
Visit site
I don't think 'interesting' is the word I would have used. Tragic seems more fitting :-/

Well yeah your description is more accurate. :angry:

For WP there are no update timelines. For WP there is no alternative to OTA updates, so ever since WP8, carriers are in full control of the update process (giant step backward from WP7). For WP carriers have no obligation to even test an update, much less distribute it if they don't want to.

In this paragraph you could replace WP with Android, and it would describe the situation exactly. However, Google is trying to get out of the muddle, but it seems Microsoft is moving in. Is Microsoft worried about alienating themselves from OEMs and/or carriers? They can't afford to lose any market share or sales. Carriers for the most part dance to Apple's fiddle so they don't need to worry about that.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
323,183
Messages
2,243,405
Members
428,037
Latest member
Brilliantick99