cckgz4
New member
I was just reading Moto G is coming first to the Emerging markets and Europe first and then US(Jan '14) so your point is moot.
its not moot if its not promoted, which was my point.
Sent from my temporary device using Tapatalk
I was just reading Moto G is coming first to the Emerging markets and Europe first and then US(Jan '14) so your point is moot.
But most people want a NEW device not a last years model.. I know most of us here don't care and will get what's best for us, but sheeps and robots don't act like that
Well LTE has only been deployed in the U.S (at a large scale) and is not as reliable (at least in my ?rea and with T-mo), so yes it is a big feature.. But not as huge as it seems
I don't know of any person who owns a Motorola phone at where I am, considering I and some close friends are huge Motorola fans. I probably had every Micro-TAC, StarTAC (I still have one), and my last was the V3688 I bought in Hannover. In my circle, Motorola is dead.
Few here understand the concepts of software optimization, and what that can realistically achieve.
Android can't, by the very nature of how it was designed, ever be as efficient as WP, but the days when that mattered are coming (at least around the $150 mark) to an end. Software optimization is quickly becoming irrelevant, because the faster hardware can brute force the software to a point where the user won't notice the difference between what is and what isn't well optimized.
Nokia could easily compete with it. They could release an update version of the 520. I know the 525 has been leaked, which is basically the 520 with 1 GB RAM and a better IPS display panel, but it wouldn't be impossible for Nokia to release a better rival for this.
That is changing. Android Run Time is going to replace the Dalvik VM.Android can't, by the very nature of how it was designed, ever be as efficient as WP, but the days when that mattered are coming (at least around the $150 mark) to an end. Software optimization is quickly becoming irrelevant, because the faster hardware can brute force the software to a point where the user won't notice the difference between what is and what isn't well optimized.
I thing that we're underestimating Android completely and that's not good at all. Lagging or not they win on the market share. While we're here praising our "stability" they are improving their OS launching this kind of devices that can easily displace the 520 (not completely of course) but the point is that the competitors are doing something at least whereas we're not.Performance is good. It lacks features but that's not really the top concern. If an OS lags and makes you want to fling the device against the wall there is a problem.
LMAO oh ok
Sent from my temporary device using Tapatalk
Consider the refunding rate of the 520 for lacking essential features that the Moto G has.