Developers of Web Videos are as much at fault as OEMs and Microsoft's staff are for being too hasty to develop HTML5, or HTM5, for both smartphones and some feature-rich standard mobile phones without effecting an equally-important "wuauclt.exe-" or "javaws'aupltlite'.jar-" type abrupt updating of mindsets of especially the former. Based on others and my own experiences, this diverging trend in audio-visual formation and management has rendered it very, even prohibitively, difficult to view any webpage-embedded video, PowerPoint slideshow, or other audio-visual presentation from and/or upon smartphones, especially either 'Ist-Generation-'smartphone-technology-compliant, usually Java-utilizing, standard feature phones (1) (Think of ALCATEL's [I]OneTouch 2017b Fling[I], most of ZTE Corporation(, Ltd.)'s Z-
nseries Mobile phones, or Samsung's SGH-A667 as examples) or increasingly-
popular Windows Mobile smartphones(2); Adobe's
Flash Player 9.0 or, preferably, successors
s thereto are
still required to view such said presentations; like [U]most[U] standard mobile feature-phones, however, Windows Mobile Phones [U]fail to support Adobe Flash Player 9.9ff. ![U] [U][I]Users MUST then use computers--preferably those running experimental Windows 4, Windows NT 3 or its pre-2000 successors, Windows 95 or 98, Windows Server 2003 or its Server predecessors, 2000, or ME, Windows XP, or best of all, Windows Vista, Servers 2008 and/or 2012, or any of their still-current successors(a) OR Macs and/or MacBooks(b) in order to view the videos [I][U]! (


:irate) Furthermore, Adobe has respectively either discontinued support and most automatic updates to Flash Player beyond Flash Player 11.6 for
any UNIX-, Linux-, and SunOS- or OpenSUSE-utilizing PC( 💻) users (1) ...or discontinued ONLY support for Flash Player 11.2's successors in and on Android smartphones.
Based on the foregoing,the very commentator who with inappropriate, or at least inappropriate-sounding facetiousness, replied to Amir's
et de al. answer-providing post with"...Hehehe, [we still must wait and see...,] WP has been around for 3.5 years..." has a now-impossible-to-disagree-with point: THE OUTRAGEOUS NATURE OF ADOBE'S ET DE AL. FAILURE TO DEVELOP SUPPORT OF ITS FLASH PLAYER OR--WHILE IT HAD PROFITABLE CHANCES TO DO SO--SUPPORT FOR ITS FLASH PLAYER LITE PLUGINS FOR AND IN OR UPON AND BY WINDOWS MOBILE PHONES...AND Microsoft's staff's FAILURE TO URGE ADOBE AND ITS STAFF AND, EVEN IF ESSENTIAL PUNITIVELY THREATEN REJECTION OF ADOBE'S UPDATES TO ITS OTHER PLUGINS IF IT WERE TO PROHIBIT ANYONE'S ATTEMPT, TO INCLUDE supportive modifications of Flash Player 's support by MacBook and iPhone alike,OR OTHERWISE MODIFY THE PLUGIN SO THAT Windows Phones easily support it AND/OR REVIVE DISCONTINUED UPDATES of its Flash Player Lite plugin and modify it for Windows Mobile's, not only Symbian's, support. Similarly appalling and/or outrageous is the apparent fact that none has urged either of the culpable corporations or groups thereof,to correct this fault - and perhaps do so likewise, as just described above.