Originally Posted by
InlineV Using a single site as a metric for how well the browser works may not be a valid test. If you can reproduce that on other sites, there may be something to it. If so, it is quite possible that the site is using features that have limited support for common rendering engines. There are numerous features built into Webkit and Google's Webkit derivative, Blink that are proprietary to their dev kits. In other words, those features are not defined as a part of the W3C standard for HTML 5. Microsoft doesn't use Webkit or Blink. They use Gecko as their rendering engine and it is proprietary to Microsoft. In terms of performance benchmarks, this has advantages because they aren't subject to an open source committee like Webkit is. That is why Google spun off of Webkit and created their own rendering engine known as Blink. As websites become more and more feature rich and interactive, the development community has leaned more heavily on features that expand on the W3C standard to help differentiate.
That's an explanation that I am not familiar with what you said and surely not arguing with that....As an end user the only thing that i'm looking for is; Is it working or not? and How well?
That is right, it need to do it to more than 1 site.
I am not complaining as I can work with it. So be it if it does have problem here and there. It will get better overtime. And that is what people need to chill out with this preview
And thinking about it; Why am I not having that problem when I use Wi-Fi as oppose of mobile data?