I think the issue of removable vs. non-removable battery is a total waste of time because it does not represent a clear advantage over the other. This is by far a matter of choice a preference and I often see reviewers put a score against a device because it has non-removable battery. Its a joke to put it simply.
Removable battery
Pros
- Can replace battery by yourselves
Cons
- You still have to carry a separate battery if you want to have extra juice
- Your phone breaks apart when you accidentally drop it.
- Extra battery is expensive
- Frequent opening of back cover to replace a battery or to take it out temporarily specially if the phone hangs may cause battery contacts to loosen.
Non-removable battery
Pros
- Phone build is solid. Your phone wont explode to pieces when you accidentally drop it although it may suffer some dents just like any other device.
- No worries about battery contacts getting loose over time
Cons
- Cannot replace battery by yourselves so you have to bring it to a service center. Ah, but there is an alternative - powerbank. Buy a cheap powerbank to have that extra juice.
So these are my list so what's your preference?
My gosh, that is tortured reasoning.
You could use a phone with a removable battery exactly like a phone with a non-removable battery.
As to your cons:
- You still have to carry a separate battery if you want to have extra juice
?? You don't *have to*. You could equally carry the same powerbank you'd carry with your non-removable-battery phone. This should be a pro: "Gives you the option to carry a smaller item (spare battery) for extra juice."
- Your phone breaks apart when you accidentally drop it.
I've had nine phones with removable batteries and never had a phone crash apart. But more importantly I don't understand why that would even be a con until it can be shown that a solid structure would protect the phone's innards better than a collapsible structure. So not necessarily a con.
- Extra battery is expensive
??
1. You don't have to buy an extra battery until you want or need one.
2. I bought 10 used Nokia 520 batteries on eBay for $22 shipped.
3. In the past four years, I've never paid more than $20 for a new battery.
- Frequent opening of back cover to replace a battery or to take it out temporarily specially if the phone hangs may cause battery contacts to loosen.
1. You don't have to open the back cover until you need or want to.
2. More modern phones are having the power button work to reset the phone.
3. Not all battery contacts are like Nokia's pins. LG's, for example, are flat and recessed, which are nearly impossible for a user to damage without striking or picking at them with a metal tool of some sort.
4. These things are made to be user replaceable. *If you can't install the battery properly, then don't install it yourself!*
Here are my removable battery pros:
1. Much smaller spare power than carrying a battery booster.
2. Can carry days of power in the size of a deck of card (e.g., overnight hiking).
3. Can un-retire and reuse off-carrier phones for years after first battery dies. (Also saves battery on your *real* cell phone). Examples:
---- Media Player (real example for me), music, podcasts, audiobooks, and video offloaded from TiVo via V-Mate.
---- Dashcam, e.g., DailyRoads Voyager Android app (real example for me).
---- Auto diagnostics (OBD II) scanner, e.g., Torque Pro Android app (real example for me)
---- GPS with Nokia offline maps (future real example for me)
4. On some phones (real examples for me):
---- optional wireless charging back,
---- extended battery back.
And my removable battery cons:
1. The phone is probably slightly thicker than if the designer had the option to not provide a removable battery.
2. Some phones might squeak (my only such experience was with a Palm Centro, which is less likely to be applicable to modern phone design). Fixed with tape on the inside of the back.
If those pros give you no advantages, great.
I completely agree with this statement in your post:
This is by far a matter of choice a preference