Phone 6 vs Nokia 1020: Better imaging all around from Apple
iPhone 6 vs Nokia 1020 - DxOMark
First of all, I have just ordered my 1020, so I dont have real samples to judge. But based on my extensive research on 1020 before, I think there are certain points from this review which are false.
1.
Seriously, " in any of the other video categories"??? Really? and "walking movements remaining uncorrected by the stabilization system", I really want to see how good the iPhone 6 without OIS can prove this??
I thought the OIS in Nokia 1020 is really good for video taking. I guess they are just blaming the slow focus of nokia 1020 here. While slow focus is one thing, but the OIS is another thing. It really depends on the video scene, fast moving object across the screen in low light will be bad for Nokia 1020, but other than that, the OIS should be a big boost. They never talked about it.
2. The Flash on iPhone 6 is better? Well ok I undertand the iPhone has a True-tone flash, and the Xenon flash might be too bright and kill the WB. but still, it's just a 50-50, why would the iPhone flash be better?
3. Most importantly, I see marketing intention here!!
because SERIOUSLY! What kind of image is this?
check this.
against
so 64 vs 80, and 56 vs 80. Why would they set the base for the bar charts differently?? Is it obvious that they just want to let people think the Nokia is way behind the iPhone 6?
I have reason to believe that they intentionally adjust the baseline in order to make ppl think the Nokia 1020 is so ****.
So it's a professinal web site I guess? DXOMark? and they use this small tricks like the bar chart to confuse the customer??
I would love to see the feedback from real user.
iPhone 6 vs Nokia 1020 - DxOMark
First of all, I have just ordered my 1020, so I dont have real samples to judge. But based on my extensive research on 1020 before, I think there are certain points from this review which are false.
1.
While the Nokia 1020 excelled for Video exposure and contrast, with good texture under bright lighting conditions, it wasn’t a match for the iPhone 6 in any of the other video categories. Video from the Nokia 1020 displayed noticeable row noise and blocking artifacts, with autofocus oscillations visible during refocusing, and walking movements remaining uncorrected by the stabilization system.
Seriously, " in any of the other video categories"??? Really? and "walking movements remaining uncorrected by the stabilization system", I really want to see how good the iPhone 6 without OIS can prove this??
I thought the OIS in Nokia 1020 is really good for video taking. I guess they are just blaming the slow focus of nokia 1020 here. While slow focus is one thing, but the OIS is another thing. It really depends on the video scene, fast moving object across the screen in low light will be bad for Nokia 1020, but other than that, the OIS should be a big boost. They never talked about it.
2. The Flash on iPhone 6 is better? Well ok I undertand the iPhone has a True-tone flash, and the Xenon flash might be too bright and kill the WB. but still, it's just a 50-50, why would the iPhone flash be better?
3. Most importantly, I see marketing intention here!!
because SERIOUSLY! What kind of image is this?
check this.
against
so 64 vs 80, and 56 vs 80. Why would they set the base for the bar charts differently?? Is it obvious that they just want to let people think the Nokia is way behind the iPhone 6?
I have reason to believe that they intentionally adjust the baseline in order to make ppl think the Nokia 1020 is so ****.
So it's a professinal web site I guess? DXOMark? and they use this small tricks like the bar chart to confuse the customer??
I would love to see the feedback from real user.
Last edited: