This is dangerous. Some people hate metro. Also, what exactly did Apple copy from it? I don't know if you've ever seen an iOS device, but the interface looks nothing like metro.
Sorry?
What's a RAM *****? If you are trying to say that Android requires more RAM than WP, that is very obviously nonsense. See how many apps can't be run on a WP phone with 512MB compared to an Android WP phone. And ask yourself yet again why Nokia chose Android for the Nokia X.
I've never ended up with a virus on any Android phone, and I don't know anyone who has. What statistics do you have to back up your claim that Android users end up with a virus by the end of each night? Maybe you are not talking about a computer virus and are implying something about Android users' nocturnal activities.
It was meant to be mostly humorous, especially point 3.
Anyways,
1) iOS 7 did take a lot of the design mentality from Metro. Removing 3D textures and such for a "flat" look, trying to clean everything up and give everything a universal look across the entire OS. But don't take my word for it, see what WPC has to say on the subject:
Meet the latest Windows Phone incarnation, iOS 7 | Windows Phone Central
2) While iOS 7 was indeed very refreshing compared to old instances of iOS, it's still in many regards, very visually similar to what was original unveiled back in 2007. Many people like it, which is fine, and it is indeed a very simple OS that people can quickly pick up on. But it hasn't changed much, and while iOS 7 was a significant step in the right direction towards something new, I feel it's carrying a lot of baggage from the original iOS design. If you like it, that's fine, but I find it old and stale, way past date. And I humorously added the "grandma's phone" part because it's reached that point where even the older folk are beginning to grasp it, which is "uncool" for many (Often cited reason for why teens are bailing from Facebook in favor of things like Instagram).
3) And it's true, Android is very resource intensive. KitKat takes big strides in solving this issue, but nonetheless, Android loves to be a resource hog. The Nokia X is running Android because Android has lower hardware requirements, and people are far more comfortable with the idea of trying some budget Nokia phone running Android as compared to Windows Phone. Mind share, my friend. However, just because Android has lower spec requirements, doesn't mean it runs all buttery smooth. From what I've seen and read, the Nokia X gets by, but you can feel how painstakingly low its specs are in regular use. Meanwhile, when I use my Lumia 520, while it is indeed slower than my Lumia 1020, it still does a very fine job in chugging along. Not bad for a device that only cost me $60. Also, the how many open apps thing is a ridiculous argument, as Android and Windows Phone handle multitasking and memory management in very different ways.
And for the virus thing, it's not a very big problem in the US and other regions with open access to the Play Store. But it is indeed a big concern in places like China, where almost everyone gets their apps from third party stores. Now, most are fine. Just don't click/tap on anything you're not supposed to, and use common sense and you'll be fine. But then again, can't the same logic be applied to the Mac vs. PC argument?
I was mostly having fun with my comment. As I said: no friendships are worth killing just due to phone preference. But if they're going to big dicks about your decision to pick Windows Phone, why not take cheap digs right back at them? Hmm?