Charles-09
New member
high specs of note4 with os version 4.4.4 is outdated with that kind of specs. If the specs applied in lumia 1520 there's nothing you can say....
comeon dude, this comment just has bitterness written all over it, if it was a windows phone you'd be praising like mad. imagine wp8.1 on it but on the curve you have notification icons from each app that gives you notification
Frankly the Note 4 would definitely be the better buy. Primarily because it will have a better screen, better processor, better battery and performance.
The camera will be significantly faster, while the video recording capabilities would stretch from 120 FPS slow-mo, 60 FPS 1080p to the 4K.
Since OpenGL on Android has better support and the Note 4 has the all new Adreno 420 GPU, expect much better graphics in games if you are into that kind of stuff.
Plus the S-Pen, multi window, 4GB of RAM, etc.
The only reason not to buy the Note 4 would possibly be because TouchWiz that comes with Samsung devices has a history of slowing down after being filled with apps and other content.
Hopefully the latest TouchWiz version and the upcoming Android L update with the beefy Snapdragon 805 will make the Note 4 the true "lagless" Samsung device.
The only reason I would see for someone to buy a Lumia 1520:
1) You want a slightly bigger screen.
2) Megapixels are everything for you.
3) You Like Microsoft/Nokia and their services and want to support the underdog in the mobile industry.
All your comments about Android devices are negative. Either because you've always gotten a defective model or you've never bought any of the devices at all.
Historically the Note series have been known for exceptional batteries.
Proof? Here it is:
View attachment 80857
View attachment 80858
Not a gimmick, completely. It's known as innovation. While it's not on my must have list, many people like the new concept and the services that come with it.
It won't be tougher to get cases for it, covers for Samsung devices are pretty much available everywhere.
^total bs im sorry to say
when i had a note 2,the battery barely lasted half a day,i even got a spare battery etc no change
android is a resource hog and you must face it
all your comments are biased and against non-android stuff im sorry to say
i do give even ios credit where due so no im not biased,im experienced
as for the curved display,you do realize the design may hinder proper cases for it
Android is a resource hog? Debatable.
No it's not "debatable". That is a common complaint with Android phones - they become sluggish. Many, many users has said as much.
Frankly the Note 4 would definitely be the better buy. Primarily because it will have a better screen, better processor, better battery and performance.
The camera will be significantly faster, while the video recording capabilities would stretch from 120 FPS slow-mo, 60 FPS 1080p to the 4K.
Since OpenGL on Android has better support and the Note 4 has the all new Adreno 420 GPU, expect much better graphics in games if you are into that kind of stuff.
Plus the S-Pen, multi window, 4GB of RAM, etc.
The only reason not to buy the Note 4 would possibly be because TouchWiz that comes with Samsung devices has a history of slowing down after being filled with apps and other content.
Hopefully the latest TouchWiz version and the upcoming Android L update with the beefy Snapdragon 805 will make the Note 4 the true "lagless" Samsung device.
The only reason I would see for someone to buy a Lumia 1520:
1) You want a slightly bigger screen.
2) Megapixels are everything for you.
3) You Like Microsoft/Nokia and their services and want to support the underdog in the mobile industry.
All your comments about Android devices are negative. Either because you've always gotten a defective model or you've never bought any of the devices at all.
Historically the Note series have been known for exceptional batteries.
Proof? Here it is:
View attachment 80857
View attachment 80858
Not a gimmick, completely. It's known as innovation. While it's not on my must have list, many people like the new concept and the services that come with it.
It won't be tougher to get cases for it, covers for Samsung devices are pretty much available everywhere.
I know exactly what you're talking about...but you're right to wait for Windows Phone 9. If 8.1 is anything to go off of 9 will be absolutely massive and critical in bringing Windows Phones closer to the competition. I have a feeling that the 1520 may be getting some special features to go with it's large screen, if not the hopeful successor I want.
Hi Salman,
You know i have a Note II and the battery has been great only for the first week. I can't say it's bad. However it's not good either. Past a few months it never got me to end of day and had to reload like 4pm to get me to end of day. It's true i am a power user with display always on. But 1520 gets me to at least 10pm even using it in the same way. I blame the unpolished OS (till L comes out), i blame too many stuff ongoing under the hood and eating data and keeping the CPU busy (call it the advertising, info gathering platform, localization services etc.) Android is a very "busy" OS under the hood.
I'll buy a 4 but i already know past a few weeks, one month, i'll have the same issues. What Note does well is making you work in a very efficient, quick way (for a smartphone of course) without stress and anger (unlike WP).
My device WAS NOT defective. I suspect some users really use the phone so intensively that their experience is affected + battery quality of Samsung VS Nokia for me goes to Nokia. My 1520 hasn't lost that much resilience over these months. Samsung at this stage was already requesting two battery changes a day or a recharge as i mentioned.
No anger towards any OS.
Hi Salman,
You know i have a Note II and the battery has been great only for the first week. I can't say it's bad. However it's not good either. Past a few months it never got me to end of day and had to reload like 4pm to get me to end of day. It's true i am a power user with display always on. But 1520 gets me to at least 10pm even using it in the same way. I blame the unpolished OS (till L comes out), i blame too many stuff ongoing under the hood and eating data and keeping the CPU busy (call it the advertising, info gathering platform, localization services etc.) Android is a very "busy" OS under the hood.
I'll buy a 4 but i already know past a few weeks, one month, i'll have the same issues. What Note does well is making you work in a very efficient, quick way (for a smartphone of course) without stress and anger (unlike WP).
My device WAS NOT defective. I suspect some users really use the phone so intensively that their experience is affected + battery quality of Samsung VS Nokia for me goes to Nokia. My 1520 hasn't lost that much resilience over these months. Samsung at this stage was already requesting two battery changes a day or a recharge as i mentioned.
No anger towards any OS.
The thing is, the Note 2 is quite old. It uses an outdated version of Android and doesn't take advantage of all the newer memory, performance and battery improvements.
The battery life has been improved since the Note 2, the Note 3 and I'm pretty sure the Note 4 will last way longer.
I don't know about you but one of my friend's has had a Note 2 for over an year now, battery life hasn't concerned him in the least.
It varies from person to person, but it isn't fair to base your decision of buying a new device based on something you bought years ago.
I could say that since Windows Mobile was terrible, Windows Phone will be the same. Or I could say that the iPhone 3GS had a camera so iPhone 6 will also have a terrible camera.
Note 4 is the better buy according to me, you could have your own opinion on this issue but I can presented mine.
Lumia 1520 is still a stellar device however, I really do love Nokia and Windows Phone but I'm only being fair.
Android is a resource hog? Debatable.
The Note series has a bad battery life? Nope.
View attachment 80902
View attachment 80903
View attachment 80904
Which brings me back to my first point, you've gone from thread to thread claiming to have owned pretty much all Android devices that have ever existed(figure of speech).
You point out issues with Android devices that nor other users of the device nor experts point out.
You've either:
a) Always gotten defective models of Android devices.
b) You've never owned any.
The thing is, the Note 2 is quite old. It uses an outdated version of Android and doesn't take advantage of all the newer memory, performance and battery improvements.
The battery life has been improved since the Note 2, the Note 3 and I'm pretty sure the Note 4 will last way longer.
I don't know about you but one of my friend's has had a Note 2 for over an year now, battery life hasn't concerned him in the least.
It varies from person to person, but it isn't fair to base your decision of buying a new device based on something you bought years ago.
I could say that since Windows Mobile was terrible, Windows Phone will be the same. Or I could say that the iPhone 3GS had a camera so iPhone 6 will also have a terrible camera.
Note 4 is the better buy according to me, you could have your own opinion on this issue but I can presented mine.
Lumia 1520 is still a stellar device however, I really do love Nokia and Windows Phone but I'm only being fair.
you said the note 2 is quite old, well so is the lumia 720 and the 820,still i see better battery life on my lumias and my other phones
if we go by that "outdated" arguement, a nokia 1100 should have a terrible battery life,i dont think android 4.2 is soo outdated that its battery life should be soo far apart from android 4.4.2 or even android L
My Galaxy Note is running 4.3. Was last updated last May i think.